Dates are inconsistent

Dates are inconsistent

15 results sorted by ID

Possible spell-corrected query: flip
2025/297 (PDF) Last updated: 2025-05-22
Practical Zero-Trust Threshold Signatures in Large-Scale Dynamic Asynchronous Networks
Offir Friedman, Avichai Marmor, Dolev Mutzari, Yehonatan Cohen Scaly, Yuval Spiizer
Cryptographic protocols

Threshold signatures have become a critical tool in cryptocurrency systems, offering enhanced security by distributing the signing process among multiple signers. In this work, we distribute this process between a client and a permissionless decentralized blockchain, and present novel protocols for ECDSA and EdDSA/Schnorr signatures in this setting. Typical threshold access architectures used by trusted custodians suffer from the honeypot problem, wherein the more assets the custodian holds,...

2024/2071 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-12-24
Perfectly Secure Fluid MPC with Abort and Linear Communication Complexity
Alexander Bienstock, Daniel Escudero, Antigoni Polychroniadou
Cryptographic protocols

The \emph{Fluid} multiparty computation (MPC) model, introduced in (Choudhuri \emph{et al.} CRYPTO 2021), addresses dynamic scenarios where participants can join or leave computations between rounds. Communication complexity initially stood at $\Omega(n^2)$ elements per gate, where $n$ is the number of parties in a committee online at a time. This held for both statistical security (honest majority) and computational security (dishonest majority) in (Choudhuri \emph{et al.}~CRYPTO'21) and...

2024/1670 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-10-15
Statistical Layered MPC
Giovanni Deligios, Anders Konring, Chen-Da Liu-Zhang, Varun Narayanan
Cryptographic protocols

The seminal work of Rabin and Ben-Or (STOC'89) showed that the problem of secure $n$-party computation can be solved for $t<n/2$ corruptions with guaranteed output delivery and statistical security. This holds in the traditional static model where the set of parties is fixed throughout the entire protocol execution. The need to better capture the dynamics of large scale and long-lived computations, where compromised parties may recover and the set of parties can change over time, has...

2024/1653 (PDF) Last updated: 2025-07-15
AD-MPC: Asynchronous Dynamic MPC with Guaranteed Output Delivery
Wenxuan Yu, Minghui Xu, Bing Wu, Sisi Duan, Xiuzhen Cheng
Cryptographic protocols

MPC-as-a-Service (MPCaaS) systems enable clients to outsource privacy-preserving computations to distributed servers, offering flexibility by adapting and configuring MPC protocols to meet diverse security requirements. However, traditional MPC protocols rely on a fixed set of servers for the entire computation process, limiting scalability. Dynamic MPC (DMPC) addresses this limitation by permitting participants to join or leave during the computation. Nevertheless, existing DMPC protocols...

2024/1526 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-09-28
Overpass Channels: Horizontally Scalable, Privacy-Enhanced, with Independent Verification, Fluid Liquidity, and Robust Censorship Proof, Payments
Brandon "Cryptskii" Ramsay
Cryptographic protocols

Overpass Channels presents a groundbreaking approach to blockchain scalability, offering a horizontally scalable, privacy-enhanced payment network with independent verification, fluid liquidity, and robust censorship resistance. This paper introduces a novel architecture that leverages zero-knowledge proofs, specifically zk-SNARKs, to ensure transaction validity and privacy while enabling unprecedented throughput and efficiency. By eliminating the need for traditional consensus mechanisms...

2024/1238 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-08-05
Dynamic Collusion Functional Encryption and Multi-Authority Attribute-Based Encryption
Rachit Garg, Rishab Goyal, George Lu
Public-key cryptography

Functional Encryption (FE) is a powerful notion of encryption which enables computations and partial message recovery of encrypted data. In FE, each decryption key is associated with a function $f$ such that decryption recovers the function evaluation $f(m)$ from an encryption of $m$. Informally, security states that a user with access to function keys $\mathsf{sk}_{f_1}, \mathsf{sk}_{f_2}, \ldots$ (and so on) can only learn $f_1(m), f_2(m), \ldots$ (and so on) but nothing more about the...

2024/813 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-11-18
How to Redact the Bitcoin Backbone Protocol
Mehmet Sabir Kiraz, Enrique Larraia, Owen Vaughan
Cryptographic protocols

We explain how to extend the Bitcoin backbone model of Garay et al. (Eurocrypt, 2015) to accommodate for redactable blockchains. Our extension captures fluid blockchain-based databases (with mutability requirements) and compliance with existing legislation, such as the GDPR right to be forgotten, or the need to erase offending data from nodes’ databases that would otherwise provoke legal shutdowns. Our redactable backbone protocol retains the essential properties of blockchains. Leveraging...

2023/839 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-06-05
On Linear Communication Complexity for (Maximally) Fluid MPC
Alexander Bienstock, Daniel Escudero, Antigoni Polychroniadou
Cryptographic protocols

Secure multiparty computation protocols with dynamic parties, which assume that honest parties do not need to be online throughout the whole execution of the protocol, have recently gained a lot of traction for computations of large scale distributed protocols, such as blockchains. More specifically, in Fluid MPC, introduced in (Choudhuri et al. CRYPTO 2021), parties can dynamically join and leave the computation from round to round. The best known Fluid MPC protocol in the honest majority...

2023/415 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-06-10
Maximally-Fluid MPC with Guaranteed Output Delivery
Giovanni Deligios, Aarushi Goel, Chen-Da Liu-Zhang
Cryptographic protocols

To overcome the limitations of traditional secure multi-party computation (MPC) protocols that consider a static set of participants, in a recent work, Choudhuri et al. [CRYPTO 2021] introduced a new model called Fluid MPC, which supports {\em dynamic} participants. Protocols in this model allow parties to join and leave the computation as they wish. Unfortunately, known fluid MPC protocols (even with strong honest-majority), either only achieve security with abort, or require strong...

2023/330 (PDF) Last updated: 2025-06-21
Perfect MPC over Layered Graphs
Bernardo David, Yuval Ishai, Anders Konring, Eyal Kushilevitz, Varun Narayanan
Cryptographic protocols

The classical "BGW protocol" (Ben-Or, Goldwasser and Wigderson, STOC 1988) shows that secure multiparty computation (MPC) among $n$ parties can be realized with perfect full security if $t < n/3$ parties are corrupted. This holds against malicious adversaries in the "standard" model for MPC, where a fixed set of $n$ parties is involved in the full execution of the protocol. However, the picture is less clear in the mobile adversary setting of Ostrovsky and Yung (PODC 1991), where the...

2022/403 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-12-01
Horst Meets Fluid-SPN: Griffin for Zero-Knowledge Applications
Lorenzo Grassi, Yonglin Hao, Christian Rechberger, Markus Schofnegger, Roman Walch, Qingju Wang
Secret-key cryptography

Zero-knowledge (ZK) applications form a large group of use cases in modern cryptography, and recently gained in popularity due to novel proof systems. For many of these applications, cryptographic hash functions are used as the main building blocks, and they often dominate the overall performance and cost of these approaches. Therefore, in the last years several new hash functions were built in order to reduce the cost in these scenarios, including Poseidon and Rescue among others. These...

2022/330 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-08-07
A Simple and Generic Approach to Dynamic Collusion Model
Rachit Garg, Rishab Goyal, George Lu
Public-key cryptography

Functional Encryption (FE) is a powerful notion of encryption which enables computations and partial message recovery of encrypted data. In FE, each decryption key is associated with a function $f$ such that decryption recovers the function evaluation $f(m)$ from an encryption of $m$. Informally, security states that a user with access to function keys $sk_{f_1}, sk_{f_2}, \ldots$ (and so on) can only learn $f_1(m), f_2(m), \ldots$ (and so on) but nothing more about the message. The system...

2021/1579 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-09-19
Le Mans: Dynamic and Fluid MPC for Dishonest Majority
Rahul Rachuri, Peter Scholl
Cryptographic protocols

Most MPC protocols require the set of parties to be active for the entire duration of the computation. Deploying MPC for use cases such as complex and resource-intensive scientific computations increases the barrier of entry for potential participants. The model of Fluid MPC (Crypto 2021) tackles this issue by giving parties the flexibility to participate in the protocol only when their resources are free. As such, the set of parties is dynamically changing over time. In this work, we...

2021/1376 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-06-06
Phoenix: Secure Computation in an Unstable Network with Dropouts and Comebacks
Ivan Damgård, Daniel Escudero, Antigoni Polychroniadou
Cryptographic protocols

We consider the task of designing secure computation protocols in an unstable network where honest parties can drop out at any time, according to a schedule provided by the adversary. This type of setting, where even honest parties are prone to failures, is more realistic than traditional models, and has therefore gained a lot of attention recently. Our model, Phoenix, enables a new approach to secure multiparty computation with dropouts, allowing parties to drop out and re-enter the...

2020/754 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-01-12
Fluid MPC: Secure Multiparty Computation with Dynamic Participants
Arka Rai Choudhuri, Aarushi Goel, Matthew Green, Abhishek Jain, Gabriel Kaptchuk

Existing approaches to secure multiparty computation (MPC) require all the participants to commit to the entire duration of the protocol. As interest in MPC continues to grow, it is inevitable that there will be a desire to use it to evaluate increasingly complex functionalities on massive datasets, resulting in computations spanning several hours or days. Such scenarios call for a dynamic participation model for MPC where participants have the flexibility to go offline as needed and...

Note: In order to protect the privacy of readers, eprint.iacr.org does not use cookies or embedded third party content.