You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On p.54, in the "Comparisons, visual and numerical" subsection, the second sentence reads "For an example of a formal comparison, consider a change in the estimated support for the death penalty from [80% ± 1.4%] to [74% ± 1.3%]." However, I think the standard errors should be switched; assuming the sample size is constant, as the caption on Fig. 4.3 suggests, standard errors should be larger for proportions closer to 0.5. Alternatively, calculating reveals:
sqrt(0.8(0.2)/1000) = 0.0126 (close to 1.3%), and
sqrt(0.74(0.26)/1000) = 0.0139 (close to 1.4%).
Thanks,
Ravi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
On p.54, in the "Comparisons, visual and numerical" subsection, the second sentence reads "For an example of a formal comparison, consider a change in the estimated support for the death penalty from [80% ± 1.4%] to [74% ± 1.3%]." However, I think the standard errors should be switched; assuming the sample size is constant, as the caption on Fig. 4.3 suggests, standard errors should be larger for proportions closer to 0.5. Alternatively, calculating reveals:
sqrt(0.8(0.2)/1000) = 0.0126 (close to 1.3%), and
sqrt(0.74(0.26)/1000) = 0.0139 (close to 1.4%).
Thanks,
Ravi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: