Skip to content

Conversation

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

To make the code base more inclusive, I've changed a few variable names from "master*" to "primary*".

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat tsweeney@redhat.com

To make the code base more inclusive, I've changed a few variable names
from "master*" to "primary*".

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I disagree with this change, the correct name is master. That is how it is defined in the kernel netlink API. Renaming just makes it harder to understand the code IMO.

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on internal discussion, LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@flouthoc flouthoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 23, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, Luap99, TomSweeneyRedHat

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Luap99,TomSweeneyRedHat,flouthoc]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jan 23, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jan 23, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7c3cb30 into containers:main Jan 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants