fix: Add pointer support for url query params (#3659) #3666
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The pointer support in url query params (using []*Struct for binding query params) was previously available in Gin, but was removed in commit 0d50ce8 since there wasn't a test case for such a scenario, and so the case block was removed as a redundant one.
|
@thinkerou @appleboy request you to kindly review & merge this small PR when you get a chance, thanks. |
appleboy
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2023
|
@omkar-foss Thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes issue #3659.
The pointer support in url query params (using
[]*Structfor binding query params) was previously available in Gin, but was removed in commit 0d50ce8 since there wasn't a test case for such a scenario, and so the case block was removed as a redundant one. This PR re-adds the pointer support along with relevant tests.Thanks @claneo for reporting #3659 in detail with the code change suggestion, and thanks @vkd for the background and review of re-adding this support.