I understand that tree-sitter's strength is in incremental parsing. Is tree-sitter still a good tool for the job if we are interested in non-incremental parsing? The documentation says that tree-sitter's parser for Rust is three times slower than that of rustc. This is a useful point of comparison, but that is a handwritten parser and that is a lot of time and energy. Are there benchmarks on tree-sitter's performance in non-incremental parsing compared to other parser-generators such as Bison, Antlr or Yacc?