| It's too complicated |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
We can use RFC6598 |
It's too hard to support |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
| It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
What's IPv6? |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
NAT444 is fine |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
| Github doesn't support IPv6 |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
 |
We don't need that many addresses |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
| Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
| What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
It's on our roadmap |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
Made with excuses from