Devdas
- 1955
- 2h 39m
IMDb RATING
7.7/10
2.1K
YOUR RATING
The scion of a wealthy landowner family turns to alcohol and self-pity and slowly self-destructs after class differences force him to break off his relationship with his childhood sweetheart... Read allThe scion of a wealthy landowner family turns to alcohol and self-pity and slowly self-destructs after class differences force him to break off his relationship with his childhood sweetheart.The scion of a wealthy landowner family turns to alcohol and self-pity and slowly self-destructs after class differences force him to break off his relationship with his childhood sweetheart.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 4 wins total
Vyjayanthimala
- Chandramukhi
- (as Vyjayanti Mala)
Kanhaiyalal Chaturvedi
- Teacher
- (as Kanhaiyalal)
Kumari Naaz
- Young Parvati
- (as Baby Naaz)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
7.72.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Masterpiece
I watched this movie a couple of days ago. No doubt the movie is considered a masterpiece of Indian Cinema. Even though the movie is nearly half a century old, it has the power to captivate the audience. The superb acting by nearly all the actors further enhances its value. Though today's generation may find it's pace somewhat slow.
It has more than mere entertainment value. Like "Gone With The Wind", it deals with an era that has gone forever. Pre-independence Bengal and Calcutta come alive in this movie. Its portrayal of life of landed gentry pre-independence Bengal is quite authenticate.
In short, A must see for all those who have always wondered why every broken heart self-destructive lover is called a Devdas.
It has more than mere entertainment value. Like "Gone With The Wind", it deals with an era that has gone forever. Pre-independence Bengal and Calcutta come alive in this movie. Its portrayal of life of landed gentry pre-independence Bengal is quite authenticate.
In short, A must see for all those who have always wondered why every broken heart self-destructive lover is called a Devdas.
A Classic Indian Story...
I'm writing - and viewed, this, as an English non-Indian, who simply loves film and is venturing from more obvious World Cinema, into the more obscure and possibly more rewarding.
So, I'm more concerned with the story than who's playing whom and such. I came across the story, Devdas, via the 2002, very colourful and (at the time, may still be the case) most expensive Indian film, which is a feast to both eye and ear. I'll review that one, once I've re-watched my new DVD of it, having only seen on TV.
The universal and accessible story, written as early as 1917 is of two childhood sweethearts - Parvati and the titular Devdas, who grow up but go their separate ways. Devdas flees to Calcutta and seeking the high- life, frequents a brothel and starts drinking; to the extent that he comes alcoholic. She marries a wealthy husband. They both regret their parting and long for what could have been. Devdas befriends a pretty prostitute - Chandramukhi - who desperately wants to love the Devdas that she inwardly sees, but cannot reach. His loves are for his childhood sweetheart - and the alcohol, only. Add family issues and you've got a nice pot-boiler of emotion, drama and pathos throughout the 160 minute run-time.
Many think, wrongly, that Indian cinema is nothing but Bollywood - lightweight singing and dancing and that serious issues on Life are either treated in a dismissive way, or not at all. In many ways, this story could be Shakespearian, or made for the Golden era of Hollywood. What makes it endlessly fascinating is of course the different culture, from marriage and fidelity to the simple poetic beauty in the landscape and costume.
There is some singing and dancing in this 1955 black & white version, but little compared to a Bollywood production and much of what there is are the rituals of the working ladies that venture into Devdas' sordid existence.
Naturally, this monochrome - and much earlier film than the 2002 one, is poorer in picture and sound quality. Mine (cover exactly as shown) had a varying faint green/olive colour cast, had quite a few blemishes picked up through time and was slightly soft. The sound is OK, if you're not fussy. However, I know that this quality is typical, for Indian film of this period. However, one gets used to it and almost comforted by it, being more intense, somehow. At least is doesn't look like a video- transfer, thankfully.
From what I gather, many agree that Bimal Roy's film, here, is the definitive adaptation, though it was made earlier, the first of which was in 1928! For popularists and lovers of colour and spectacle, go for the 2002 glossy version. If the story and the acting and a purer form of beauty is what you're after, then this one will have you enthralled. Though the film itself is a four and half starrer, I've not rounded it up, due to transfer quality issue.
So, I'm more concerned with the story than who's playing whom and such. I came across the story, Devdas, via the 2002, very colourful and (at the time, may still be the case) most expensive Indian film, which is a feast to both eye and ear. I'll review that one, once I've re-watched my new DVD of it, having only seen on TV.
The universal and accessible story, written as early as 1917 is of two childhood sweethearts - Parvati and the titular Devdas, who grow up but go their separate ways. Devdas flees to Calcutta and seeking the high- life, frequents a brothel and starts drinking; to the extent that he comes alcoholic. She marries a wealthy husband. They both regret their parting and long for what could have been. Devdas befriends a pretty prostitute - Chandramukhi - who desperately wants to love the Devdas that she inwardly sees, but cannot reach. His loves are for his childhood sweetheart - and the alcohol, only. Add family issues and you've got a nice pot-boiler of emotion, drama and pathos throughout the 160 minute run-time.
Many think, wrongly, that Indian cinema is nothing but Bollywood - lightweight singing and dancing and that serious issues on Life are either treated in a dismissive way, or not at all. In many ways, this story could be Shakespearian, or made for the Golden era of Hollywood. What makes it endlessly fascinating is of course the different culture, from marriage and fidelity to the simple poetic beauty in the landscape and costume.
There is some singing and dancing in this 1955 black & white version, but little compared to a Bollywood production and much of what there is are the rituals of the working ladies that venture into Devdas' sordid existence.
Naturally, this monochrome - and much earlier film than the 2002 one, is poorer in picture and sound quality. Mine (cover exactly as shown) had a varying faint green/olive colour cast, had quite a few blemishes picked up through time and was slightly soft. The sound is OK, if you're not fussy. However, I know that this quality is typical, for Indian film of this period. However, one gets used to it and almost comforted by it, being more intense, somehow. At least is doesn't look like a video- transfer, thankfully.
From what I gather, many agree that Bimal Roy's film, here, is the definitive adaptation, though it was made earlier, the first of which was in 1928! For popularists and lovers of colour and spectacle, go for the 2002 glossy version. If the story and the acting and a purer form of beauty is what you're after, then this one will have you enthralled. Though the film itself is a four and half starrer, I've not rounded it up, due to transfer quality issue.
10burman
Based on Sharatchandra's literary classic of the same name, it is a landmark in the history of Indian Cinema.
This film was just excellent on all counts, be it direction, cinematography, acting or music. A classic produced and directed by Bimal Roy. And what performances ! Motilal, Dilip Kumar, Vyjayanthimala and Suchitra Sen, all excelled. And what a musical score ! Talat Mahmood's "Mitwa, lagi re yeh kaisi" and "Kisko khabar thi, kisko yakeen tha, aise bhi din aayenge" are among his best numbers. So are Lata Mangeshkar's "Jise tu qabool karle", "O' jaane wale, ruk ja koi dam" and "Ab aage teri marzi" are excellent numbers. Two other songs, "Woh na aayenge palat kar, chahe lakh ham bulaayen", sung by Mubarak Begum and "Manzil ki chaah mein" are haunting songs.
Masterpiece of Indian Cinema before Bollywood!
The haunting tragedy of a man's unrequited love has not been given more deserving tribute that this Bimal Roy masterpiece.
I watched Bimal Roy's Devdas (1955) and Bansali's Devdas (2002) On the same day.
Shahrukh, Aishwarya, Madhuri and Bhansali's Devdas look like school children play In front of this cinematic masterpiece. To be honest it was so painful to watch Shahrukh as Devdas after watching Dilip Kumar that I had to skip many scenes.
Devdas' story is dark, haunting and a painful journey of a man's self destructing spiral that leaves him empty at the end of his character arc. He is beyond saving and all the efforts of people around him goes in wane. There has been no better tragic character written than Devdas. If west has Shakespeare than India had Sharad Chandra Chatterjee.
Bimal Roy's understanding of the atmosphere of the story, the chronologically spawning darkness of the inner world of lead character and his visual aesthetics are so true to the actual book that you can do nothing but marvel at the masterpiece that you witness.
You should watch this movie to witness the true Indian cinema. I do not even want to compare it further with (2002) Devdas for it will be disrespectful for it!
I watched Bimal Roy's Devdas (1955) and Bansali's Devdas (2002) On the same day.
Shahrukh, Aishwarya, Madhuri and Bhansali's Devdas look like school children play In front of this cinematic masterpiece. To be honest it was so painful to watch Shahrukh as Devdas after watching Dilip Kumar that I had to skip many scenes.
Devdas' story is dark, haunting and a painful journey of a man's self destructing spiral that leaves him empty at the end of his character arc. He is beyond saving and all the efforts of people around him goes in wane. There has been no better tragic character written than Devdas. If west has Shakespeare than India had Sharad Chandra Chatterjee.
Bimal Roy's understanding of the atmosphere of the story, the chronologically spawning darkness of the inner world of lead character and his visual aesthetics are so true to the actual book that you can do nothing but marvel at the masterpiece that you witness.
You should watch this movie to witness the true Indian cinema. I do not even want to compare it further with (2002) Devdas for it will be disrespectful for it!
Tragic Masterpiece of a Forlorn Love Affair !
The simple, austere, penetrating, candid and passionately electrifying depiction of subtle human values and sentiments is the hallmark of Bimal Roy's DEVDAS.
Dilip Kumar's demeanor in this heartrending movie happens to be the culmination of his acting prowess which is all praise and nothing else. He was no Dilip Kumar in the film but exact imitation of the role. He outperformed in perfectly getting under the skin of a prodigal Devdas in the first hour of the movie and a profligate Devdas in the last hour. Besides, the very real to life and original performance of Dilip, Suchitra Sen's weighted speech quality and simple dialog delivery adds resonance to an already touching storyline that goes to the heart of every viewer.
The direction of Bimal Roy is superbly excellent and all the more imaginative and original, i.e, no artificial, tawdry and superfluous love scenes and no vulgarity, as well. He believed in ruling over the hearts of the audience through the sheer force of evocative and poignant dialogs, songs and cinematography. That is a quality, in sharp contrast with the latest version of Bhansali's Devdas. Roy's Devdas should be regarded as an intellectually perfect cinematic sequence in the history of Indian film making.
This black and white, old cinematic rendition of Chatterjee's novel is definitely head and shoulders above Bhansali's flamboyant and extravagant version of 2002, starring Shahrukh Khan.
Dilip Kumar's demeanor in this heartrending movie happens to be the culmination of his acting prowess which is all praise and nothing else. He was no Dilip Kumar in the film but exact imitation of the role. He outperformed in perfectly getting under the skin of a prodigal Devdas in the first hour of the movie and a profligate Devdas in the last hour. Besides, the very real to life and original performance of Dilip, Suchitra Sen's weighted speech quality and simple dialog delivery adds resonance to an already touching storyline that goes to the heart of every viewer.
The direction of Bimal Roy is superbly excellent and all the more imaginative and original, i.e, no artificial, tawdry and superfluous love scenes and no vulgarity, as well. He believed in ruling over the hearts of the audience through the sheer force of evocative and poignant dialogs, songs and cinematography. That is a quality, in sharp contrast with the latest version of Bhansali's Devdas. Roy's Devdas should be regarded as an intellectually perfect cinematic sequence in the history of Indian film making.
This black and white, old cinematic rendition of Chatterjee's novel is definitely head and shoulders above Bhansali's flamboyant and extravagant version of 2002, starring Shahrukh Khan.
Did you know
- TriviaRanks on Number 2 on University of Iowa's List of Top 10 Bollywood Films by Corey K. Creekmur.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Celluloid Man (2012)
- SoundtracksJise tu kabool kar le woh
Sung by Lata Mangeshkar
- How long is Devdas?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 2h 39m(159 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






