Lucas (Stevens) and his partner Simon (John Lupton) set about to capture the renegade white man who caused the deaths of Lucas' parents in an Indian raid.Lucas (Stevens) and his partner Simon (John Lupton) set about to capture the renegade white man who caused the deaths of Lucas' parents in an Indian raid.Lucas (Stevens) and his partner Simon (John Lupton) set about to capture the renegade white man who caused the deaths of Lucas' parents in an Indian raid.
Maureen Hingert
- Tanana
- (as Jana Davi)
Jered Barclay
- Singer
- (as Jerry Barclay)
Dean Fredericks
- Charlie Whitman
- (as Norman Fredric)
Jean Inness
- Martha Rand
- (as Jean Innes)
Robert J. Stevenson
- Norris
- (as Robert Stevenson)
Bill Erwin
- Bartender
- (as William Erwin)
Eddie Little Sky
- 2nd Indian chief
- (as Eddie Little)
Featured reviews
Very raw script in terms of language showing depths of violence and bigotry among all players even rogue native American Indian peoples... Granted European & South American invaders give Our Native American Indian Tribal peoples an argument for simply defending their territories. Shame they had no functional central government before Europeans especially from England's Royal Monarchy Imperialism influences missed the opportunity for a more harmonious merger in our history. All Nation's beginnings have raw greed and fear feeding disastrous moments.
This film captures that the mental health problems of just a few always resulting in big wars.
The script and actors pulling off such a high quality effort ON FILM is something that could NOT be done today.
It's a bit plodding and complex, but truly ruthless human behavior that definitely would be how things were for many in rural settings.
Criminals if all skin tones were the biggest problem...no laws to adhere to, mass slaughter of herds for furs because textile fabrics from cotton picking hadn't been established yet nationally. Yes, Union Soldiers probably helped emancipate slaves wearing slave labor uniforms. Appropriately so, given the result, more reasons emancipation was mandatory. Only possible by a noble Central Government.
This film puts some things in historically accurate context in cultural meanness; how true lowlifes mixed with settlers - both Euro & Indian - played out in cruel ways when good tribes/settlers met up with criminal rogues away from the help of any type of government defense.
It definitely wasn't exactly as free as anyone wants to pretend.
This film captures that the mental health problems of just a few always resulting in big wars.
The script and actors pulling off such a high quality effort ON FILM is something that could NOT be done today.
It's a bit plodding and complex, but truly ruthless human behavior that definitely would be how things were for many in rural settings.
Criminals if all skin tones were the biggest problem...no laws to adhere to, mass slaughter of herds for furs because textile fabrics from cotton picking hadn't been established yet nationally. Yes, Union Soldiers probably helped emancipate slaves wearing slave labor uniforms. Appropriately so, given the result, more reasons emancipation was mandatory. Only possible by a noble Central Government.
This film puts some things in historically accurate context in cultural meanness; how true lowlifes mixed with settlers - both Euro & Indian - played out in cruel ways when good tribes/settlers met up with criminal rogues away from the help of any type of government defense.
It definitely wasn't exactly as free as anyone wants to pretend.
This is the worst Western, and maybe even the worst movie ever made. I kept watching it hoping that it had to get better , but alas it continued in a downward spiral. It is so bad that it is unintentionally funny .
It looked like it was photographed in someones back yard in an LA suburb.
Even the old quickie Westerns in the !930's were better than this .
Larry Storch's Mexican character set back Mexican - American relations 20 years
The Federales probably tried to have him arrested for insulting the Mexican culture .
Most of the dialog was amateurish drivel , and the acting was even worst .
View this film only if you are desperately lonely , and have absolutely nothing else to do .
It looked like it was photographed in someones back yard in an LA suburb.
Even the old quickie Westerns in the !930's were better than this .
Larry Storch's Mexican character set back Mexican - American relations 20 years
The Federales probably tried to have him arrested for insulting the Mexican culture .
Most of the dialog was amateurish drivel , and the acting was even worst .
View this film only if you are desperately lonely , and have absolutely nothing else to do .
Gun Fever is directed by Mark Stevens and Stevens co-writes the screenplay with Stanley Silverman. It stars Stevens, John Lupton, Larry Storch, Maureen Hingert and Aaron Saxon. Music is by Paul Dunlap and cinematography by Charles Van Enger.
It feels a bit churlish to criticize Mark Stevens' Gun Fever for its cheap feel and well worn plotting, for he clearly has respect for the genre. Apart from budget restrictions stymying his hopes for something more dramatically appealing, he's probably more hampered by his own decision to make a safe old traditional Oater. He relies on tried and tested staples in the hope of appeasing the masses, particularly with the standard "get revenge on the man who instigated the killing of my folks" storyline.
The wind machine is permanently on, more so in the sound mix than actually blowing up a gale in scenes, so it's not a good sign that this is noticeable to viewers more so than what is actually on the screen. The Mexican character is played poorly by New Yorker Larry Scorch, and this is consistent with the all round average feel to the play playing out. However, Stevens and Enger manage to put a grim texture to the visuals, creating an earthy mud and rags look more befitting the real Wild West than the glossy Hollywood one.
Sadly doesn't live up to the promise of its throat grabbing opening, and not one to recommend seeking out as a matter of need, but there's worse out there and it's not for Stevens' want of trying that it's no great genre offering. 5/10
It feels a bit churlish to criticize Mark Stevens' Gun Fever for its cheap feel and well worn plotting, for he clearly has respect for the genre. Apart from budget restrictions stymying his hopes for something more dramatically appealing, he's probably more hampered by his own decision to make a safe old traditional Oater. He relies on tried and tested staples in the hope of appeasing the masses, particularly with the standard "get revenge on the man who instigated the killing of my folks" storyline.
The wind machine is permanently on, more so in the sound mix than actually blowing up a gale in scenes, so it's not a good sign that this is noticeable to viewers more so than what is actually on the screen. The Mexican character is played poorly by New Yorker Larry Scorch, and this is consistent with the all round average feel to the play playing out. However, Stevens and Enger manage to put a grim texture to the visuals, creating an earthy mud and rags look more befitting the real Wild West than the glossy Hollywood one.
Sadly doesn't live up to the promise of its throat grabbing opening, and not one to recommend seeking out as a matter of need, but there's worse out there and it's not for Stevens' want of trying that it's no great genre offering. 5/10
Yes it's low budget but deserves watching for it's gritty, no nonsense and uncompromising violence, especially when compared to other westerns of this period.
Did you know
- How long is Gun Fever?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Bitter is the Ride
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content