IMDb RATING
6.3/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
James Garner put in a winning performance as a similarly unreconstructed capitalist in the grip of merger mania.James Garner put in a winning performance as a similarly unreconstructed capitalist in the grip of merger mania.James Garner put in a winning performance as a similarly unreconstructed capitalist in the grip of merger mania.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Edward Platt
- Harrison Glenn
- (as Edward C. Platt)
Russell Ash
- Middle-Aged Man
- (uncredited)
Nicky Blair
- Pete
- (uncredited)
Harold Bostwick
- Workman
- (uncredited)
Perri Bova
- Girl
- (uncredited)
Robert Clarke
- Reporter
- (uncredited)
Robert Conrad
- Bellboy
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Cameron Hawley's novel about the politics inherent in corporate boardrooms became the essential business drama Executive Suite (1954). With that film's Oscar nominated cinematographer (George J. Folsey) and supporting actress (Nina Foch) as well as Dean Jagger and character actor Edgar Stehli, this one was made into a comedy featuring James Garner (in the title role) and Natalie Wood. It was adapted by Lenore J. Coffee and Marion Hargrove, and directed by Joseph Pevney.
The story has enough misdirection (and at least one dead end) in it to keep it interesting, even if (at times) it gets somewhat confusing, but Garner's charm and Wood's natural beauty makes it eminently watchable.
The cast also includes E.G. Marshall, Henry Jones, Otto Kruger, Roland Winters and Edward Platt as key players in the various dealings by McCall, an elusive character whose reputation is not unlike Wall Street (1987)'s Gordon Gekko.
McCall wants to buy Grant Austen's (Jagger) plastics company, in part because Austen's daughter is Lory (Wood), a woman with whom he has an unrequited past. Jones (whose boss is Platt) plays McCall's associate, Marshall his lawyer and Kruger his banker. Winters and Foch (her boss is Stehli) are the foe and foil that add conflict to the initially smooth transaction and romance.
The story has enough misdirection (and at least one dead end) in it to keep it interesting, even if (at times) it gets somewhat confusing, but Garner's charm and Wood's natural beauty makes it eminently watchable.
The cast also includes E.G. Marshall, Henry Jones, Otto Kruger, Roland Winters and Edward Platt as key players in the various dealings by McCall, an elusive character whose reputation is not unlike Wall Street (1987)'s Gordon Gekko.
McCall wants to buy Grant Austen's (Jagger) plastics company, in part because Austen's daughter is Lory (Wood), a woman with whom he has an unrequited past. Jones (whose boss is Platt) plays McCall's associate, Marshall his lawyer and Kruger his banker. Winters and Foch (her boss is Stehli) are the foe and foil that add conflict to the initially smooth transaction and romance.
We are about fifteen minutes into this film before we meet the titular Mr. McCall, but by that time we have an idea who he is, based upon "heresay evidence"-the opinions of industry mavens, those who observe him frequently, and the man on the street who only knows what he reads of the elusive millionaire. So, when we first meet Mr. McCall (James Garner), he is a breath of fresh air.
He seems so likable, so transparent. This man who has a reputation for buying companies and tearing them apart for maximum profit (regardless of the consequences to employees or communities, almost for sport, really) is revealed to be a man of principles.
He approaches the owner of Austen Plastics (Dean Jagger) about purchasing his company. Grant Austen has seen the changing business world pass him by and is anxious to retire. A deal is struck, but it is only the beginning of the drama.
One complication is that Austen's daughter, Lory (Natalie Wood), has a history with Cash McCall. And he is motivated to renew their relationship.
Cash McCall lives in a hotel apartment that is 60s chic. One of the joys of this film is seeing its depictions of fashion and the decorative arts.
Another is the list of actors who play major roles in the film. Garner plays a role suited to him and he fully occupies it. Wood rises to the occasion, perhaps due in part to his efforts, and matches his spirit and romantic chemistry. Among the other actors, two deserve to be mentioned: Dean Jagger, who makes Grant Austen totally believable; and Henry Jones, who plays Gil Clark, the skeptical efficiency expert who is given an education in business by Cash. Check out "The Bad Seed" if you want to see Henry Jones in another masterly performance.
This is an enjoyable film. The romance, though a subplot, is between two affable characters. And the business drama has a point of view and actually gives us a rare cinema hero-the capitalist who is depicted as a moral man.
He seems so likable, so transparent. This man who has a reputation for buying companies and tearing them apart for maximum profit (regardless of the consequences to employees or communities, almost for sport, really) is revealed to be a man of principles.
He approaches the owner of Austen Plastics (Dean Jagger) about purchasing his company. Grant Austen has seen the changing business world pass him by and is anxious to retire. A deal is struck, but it is only the beginning of the drama.
One complication is that Austen's daughter, Lory (Natalie Wood), has a history with Cash McCall. And he is motivated to renew their relationship.
Cash McCall lives in a hotel apartment that is 60s chic. One of the joys of this film is seeing its depictions of fashion and the decorative arts.
Another is the list of actors who play major roles in the film. Garner plays a role suited to him and he fully occupies it. Wood rises to the occasion, perhaps due in part to his efforts, and matches his spirit and romantic chemistry. Among the other actors, two deserve to be mentioned: Dean Jagger, who makes Grant Austen totally believable; and Henry Jones, who plays Gil Clark, the skeptical efficiency expert who is given an education in business by Cash. Check out "The Bad Seed" if you want to see Henry Jones in another masterly performance.
This is an enjoyable film. The romance, though a subplot, is between two affable characters. And the business drama has a point of view and actually gives us a rare cinema hero-the capitalist who is depicted as a moral man.
The best part of this Technicolor exercise is the light it shines on high-power business dealings and how these were treated in the Production Code 1950's-- and is worth a quick few words.
In that Cold War decade, Hollywood discovered the drama of corporation boardrooms and big business in such films as the ruthless Patterns (1956), the intrigues of Executive Suite (1954), and the comedic Solid Gold Cadillac (1956). All in all, these movies hold up well despite the passage of years. The trick for films of this type was to be realistic enough with the big money scheming to hold audience interest without at the same time indicting the upper tiers of capitalism. For to do the latter would, among other reasons, serve the interests of the Soviet side of the Cold War then at its peak. As a result, in such movies conscience or a force for good usually prevails at the last minute over ruthless business connivings no matter how unconvincing the abrupt triumph. And that's very much the case in the otherwise routine Cash McCall.
At first, McCall is characterized as a corporate vulture—a wheeler-dealer who buys up struggling companies, disassembles them for profit, and then walks away from whatever communities he may have destroyed in the process. But, of course, it's hard to make a sympathetic lead out of such a ruthless character, even for such a likable personality as James Garner. So the screenplay begins to fudge. He's next characterized as a dis-assembler whose aim is to build up anew from the pieces, though the human consequences are not made clear. And finally, after a thorough conversion, he becomes a full-fledged business humanitarian putting communities first for reasons that also remain rather unclear, but does, of course, produce a happy ending. Thus, the ends of the Production Code, the Cold War, and audience expectations are duly served.
The movie itself is pretty unmemorable. To me the pairing of the mature Garner and the rather callow Wood seems a brittle one, no matter how much the winsome Wood is glamorized. Then too, Garner suppresses his charming Maverick side in the interests of getting into McCall's character, but in the process gives up his special appeal as an actor. On the other hand, it's a fine array of supporting players, especially Henry Jones whose Bassett- hound face registers an unusual array of subtle emotions. His is a very different appearance for that glamour-obsessed time period. Anyway, the movie's a decent enough entertainment, but outside of its wheeler-dealer instruction manual, remains pretty forgettable.
In that Cold War decade, Hollywood discovered the drama of corporation boardrooms and big business in such films as the ruthless Patterns (1956), the intrigues of Executive Suite (1954), and the comedic Solid Gold Cadillac (1956). All in all, these movies hold up well despite the passage of years. The trick for films of this type was to be realistic enough with the big money scheming to hold audience interest without at the same time indicting the upper tiers of capitalism. For to do the latter would, among other reasons, serve the interests of the Soviet side of the Cold War then at its peak. As a result, in such movies conscience or a force for good usually prevails at the last minute over ruthless business connivings no matter how unconvincing the abrupt triumph. And that's very much the case in the otherwise routine Cash McCall.
At first, McCall is characterized as a corporate vulture—a wheeler-dealer who buys up struggling companies, disassembles them for profit, and then walks away from whatever communities he may have destroyed in the process. But, of course, it's hard to make a sympathetic lead out of such a ruthless character, even for such a likable personality as James Garner. So the screenplay begins to fudge. He's next characterized as a dis-assembler whose aim is to build up anew from the pieces, though the human consequences are not made clear. And finally, after a thorough conversion, he becomes a full-fledged business humanitarian putting communities first for reasons that also remain rather unclear, but does, of course, produce a happy ending. Thus, the ends of the Production Code, the Cold War, and audience expectations are duly served.
The movie itself is pretty unmemorable. To me the pairing of the mature Garner and the rather callow Wood seems a brittle one, no matter how much the winsome Wood is glamorized. Then too, Garner suppresses his charming Maverick side in the interests of getting into McCall's character, but in the process gives up his special appeal as an actor. On the other hand, it's a fine array of supporting players, especially Henry Jones whose Bassett- hound face registers an unusual array of subtle emotions. His is a very different appearance for that glamour-obsessed time period. Anyway, the movie's a decent enough entertainment, but outside of its wheeler-dealer instruction manual, remains pretty forgettable.
When Natalie Wood was in her prime, she was at the top of the biz, stunningly beautiful, sharp, but accessible. And no one played the all-american stud better than Jim Garner.
Call it a bedroom farce if you like but Cash McCall combines a lot of wheeling and dealing with a good old fashioned boy-meets-girl to make a very pleasing movie.
At first glance, McCall (Garner) is part playboy, part ruthless businessman, but we know better; that his heart of gold belongs only to Lory Austen (Wood), a woman he met last Summer, and he's thought of nothing but her since.
Standard fare, well done with attractive stars, that alone puts it in the upper 20% as far as I'm concerned. Enjoy it.
Call it a bedroom farce if you like but Cash McCall combines a lot of wheeling and dealing with a good old fashioned boy-meets-girl to make a very pleasing movie.
At first glance, McCall (Garner) is part playboy, part ruthless businessman, but we know better; that his heart of gold belongs only to Lory Austen (Wood), a woman he met last Summer, and he's thought of nothing but her since.
Standard fare, well done with attractive stars, that alone puts it in the upper 20% as far as I'm concerned. Enjoy it.
This is a great, fun film with the feel of similar films of the era such as 1962's "That Touch of Mink," whose plot bears more than a passing resemblance to this film's.
James Garner is great as usual, as is the radiant Natalie Wood. Dean Jagger's performance as the plastic company patriarch strikes just the right note and Henry Jones does his usual excellent job as the somewhat smarmy assistant.
But one of the real stars of the film is its 1960 decor. It really sets the period but also has a very distinctive look that is now considered retro-"atomic chic" with more than a little "Googie" thrown in.
I've no idea why this film hasn't been released on DVD (it's perfect for anamorphic DVD at a 1.85:1 aspect ratio). If you don't want to rent or purchase the VHS tape, your only recourse is to await its very infrequent showings on cable (most recently on Encore's "Love" channel some six or so years ago.)
James Garner is great as usual, as is the radiant Natalie Wood. Dean Jagger's performance as the plastic company patriarch strikes just the right note and Henry Jones does his usual excellent job as the somewhat smarmy assistant.
But one of the real stars of the film is its 1960 decor. It really sets the period but also has a very distinctive look that is now considered retro-"atomic chic" with more than a little "Googie" thrown in.
I've no idea why this film hasn't been released on DVD (it's perfect for anamorphic DVD at a 1.85:1 aspect ratio). If you don't want to rent or purchase the VHS tape, your only recourse is to await its very infrequent showings on cable (most recently on Encore's "Love" channel some six or so years ago.)
Did you know
- TriviaJames Garner's last film under his Warner Brothers contract. After a writer's strike halted all Warner Brothers productions, even though Garner had a "play or pay" contract, Warner Brothers refused to pay him. Garner sued the studio for breach of contract and won.
- GoofsThe log that Lory and Cash sit on is elevated from the ground and held in place by a bolt.
- Quotes
Winston Conway: I'm not a moralist, I'm a lawyer.
- How long is Cash McCall?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content