Diary of a Nudist

Diary of a Nudist (1961)

** (out of 4)

Doris Wishman directed this story of a newspaper editor who gets lost in the woods and stumbles onto a nudist camp. Back at his office he talks a female reporter into going to the camp and getting a day-by-day account of the activities. DIARY OF A NUDIST is yet another boring film from the director but I'm actually going to give her more credit than normal because she actually makes this film look like a professional one, which if you've ventured into this genre much you'll know that this isn't often the case with this type of movie. I'll also give Wishman credit for having a good eye for "talent" as the majority of the nudist range from extremely hot to incredibly cute looking. This here is always a major plus but sometimes these films don't deliver that. Obviously the main goal of this film was to show off as much nudity as possible so fans just wanting to see that are going to be in for a real treat. While this here might have been shocking or interesting in 1961, when viewed today you can't help but look at it as being tame. You also can't help but feel incredibly bored because even naked cute girls get boring after a while. There's really no story to speak of and the entire expose of the colony was just used by the producer to make you feel as if you were seeing more than just the nudity. Fans of the genre will probably want to check this out but I'd say most people are going to have a hard time making through the entire thing.

This is a very deep movie. It addresses so many social issues in a very subtle way. This should be required viewing for any film class. The director didn't waste valuable screen time with dialog. Instead she got lots of shots of tits. Okay, so a newspaper editor discovers a nudist colony and decides to expose the group to the public and have it shut down. To do this, he assigns his best reporter and tells her to act like a nudist. In other words, let's see those tits. Here's where the story really takes off. The reporter is given a tour of the place by an ugly, old lady who doesn't get naked. We're all grateful for that. While on the tour she's exposed to people playing shuffleboard. The people playing shuffleboard are having a wonderful time, watching a puck slide. They're all happy, smiling and even excited. Playing shuffleboard. They're grinning from ear to ear. Playing shuffleboard. They're naked. Playing shuffleboard. They don't speak. They just grin and laugh and play shuffleboard. The reporter finds herself enjoying the place. All the guests are fairly young and in decent shape. No fatties or old farts. You can see boobs all over the place. The reporter starts to think there's nothing wrong with letting her tits hang out. She thinks playing shuffleboard naked and getting all excited is okay. Then we see the swimming pool. A woman gets out of the water and dries herself. She's smiling. She dries the same spot on her leg for like a minute. She's happy and excited just like the people playing shuffleboard. She doesn't speak either. She just grins and dries herself. I guess she's happy that everybody can see her tits and she's getting paid to show them. Then the story takes us to another place. The editor shows up. He doesn't get naked. He wears this ridiculous bikini bottom that covers his belly button. It looks stupid. He walks around and sees the idiots playing shuffleboard and grinning and women getting out of the pool and drying off and grinning. And of course he sees a bunch of boobs. The editor changes his mind about the place and even falls in love with the reporter. Her dedication to the job, her writing skills, her tits. He decides the place is okay. I mean you've got a bunch of boobs to look at and nobody says anything. Director to actress - "Okay, in this scene I want you to look at the people playing shuffleboard and think to yourself how great it is" Director to cameraman - "Make sure you get her tits in the shot" Most people would think this movie was nothing more than an excuse to show boobs and butts but maybe it isn't. Sure, there's a scene where we see the reporter just looking the place over and showing her boobs. She doesn't speak. She just stands there with her boobs out. Sure there are more scenes where nobody speaks and we see more boobs. But deep down the movie is sending a message. Take your clothes off and play shuffleboard. You'll turn into an idiot. I would give this 10 out of 10 stars but I didn't like how they never told us the score in the shuffleboard matches. So, I give it 1 star out of 10.

I think that the comments from other reviewers about this nudie-cutie are a little too harsh.This Film is fluffy & contrite yes;but exudes an American ideal of paradise at the time of the Kennedy pseudo-crusade of 'Camelot'.Meaning that America was then riding the crest of a wave of optimism.This Film seems to capture some strange,incongruous 'feel-good' factor that epitomises this.It has the Pine Trees of Florida,the blue of the everglades & the flesh tones of the Sunny Palms Lodge.The music soundtrack is atmospheric mood-jazz & 12-bar blues.Tiki-stone gods & white Chevrolets all add to the genre. We had a similar Film in Britain at the same time: 1961 called 'Naked As Nature Intended' but Cornwall isn't as HOT as Florida (in both senses of the word). I would recommend people not be put off seeing this Doris Wishman gem.It is well worth the current price of a DVD. Having watched this film recently;it has lost none of it's 'feel-good' impression on me.The 'dubbed' dialogue:- I assume is still the original actors?.This gives the film extra charm because the background noises i.e. birdsong,typing clatter are all on the same track.

Diary Of A Nudist was the kind of movie that was extremely controversial and daring 45 years ago. This was the kind of movie that teenagers with fake I.D.'s would go out to see at the drive-ins. For years, mainstream cinema never offered up any skin and seeing the kinds of nudie-cutie quickies from Russ Meyer, Herschell Gordon Lewis, and Doris Wishman certainly were a shock to the system. Today, films like this are considered to be curiosity pieces. There is tons of nudity but very little else. No titillation, no sexual situations, and nothing explicit. Just a group of healthy, beautiful people doing everyday things in the buff.

Still, the movie is a lot of fun to watch; even though there seems to be so much tedium and is slow moving. The scenery is beautiful and you feel you are seeing what Heaven would look like in 1961. There are some fine looking women who always seem to be carrying around hats, towels, and magazines over the more "controversial" private parts. Also, Davee Decker is quite lovely; even though her voice is dubbed.

If you long to see what an "adult movie" was like in the early days and can accept the fact that it is only nudity and nothing more then you will have some fun with this one. It airs occasionally on Drive-In Classics.

Is this a great movie? No. There is no real plot and no acting to speak of. But it's a great reminder of how movies were pre-Deep Throat.

Obscenity laws forced nudie filmmakers to make it appear that these movies promoted public awareness.

Hence, this is done as a pseudo documentary. Not unlike some of Russ Meyer's very early flicks. (Mondo Topless, etc.)

There's plenty of T&A. Full frontal female nudes abound.

The guy's are naked too, only you don't see anything.

What is striking about this movie is how hot the girls are. It's a fun movie to watch, but don't expect anything close to porn. It's really just hot girls lounging around in different places at the nudist colony.

It's so innocent it's great!