Island of the Blue Dolphins

I remember seeing this movie years ago. It was based on the book, which was a true story. However, it is true that when Europeans came along, they did bring along diseases, and sadly enough murdered innocent natives. Those people tried hard to defend their territory, but were outnumbered. This movie tells the story of a girl who survived after her tribe left the island. It's too sad to think about much more. I would only recommend it if you like true stories about history. Otherwise, all you will see is a lot of people dying, and sad stuff along the way.

Out of the gate, I'd like to start by describing this as an awfully simple "snippet" of someone's life, not so much a story.

But for something from the 60s, it's refreshingly grim situation and cruel developments manage to entertain for its duration. Still, it is dreadful slow in some parts, but still structurally okay. The lead is somewhat charming and her relationships are touchingly cute at times. And while we see her struggle a bit (sanity), I bet the novel provides deeper insight into her thoughts and emotions during this ordeal. Sadly, this movie could have done so much more with the plot!! Also the novel spans 18 years worth of abandonment.. but the film makes time-passage quite ambiguous.

This is probably a "bad" adaptation of the source material.. but an interesting entrypoint to what might be a richer story to those interested.

Personally, I liked what I saw, but would be reluctant to recommend it.

Director James B. Clark, producer Robert B. Radnitz and everybody involved must have had very good intentions in adapting Scott O'Dell's book, based on what happened to Juana María, a Nicoleño Native American who was abandoned on an island in California when she was 12 years old, and lived there for 18 years during the 19th century; and I also guess there was something attractive in the way it was told because I had never forgotten about it, after seeing it in 1964. For this version, the character must be at least 18 years old, she is pretty and called Karana, played by Celia Kaye (once married to director John Milius). The movie did very well at the box office then, but understandably nobody knows about it today. A tale of human persistence and survival, it was given "the Disney touch" after a strong first act in which the chief of Karana's tribe (who happens to be her father, a handsome man who also recites the cosmogony of the tribe) is killed by white hunters led by an ugly Russian captain (George Kennedy). Once she is by herself, Karana goes hunting and fishing, argues with dogs, becomes friends with parrots and a seal, talks to herself and is neither sick, hurt or swollen, nor must suffer storms, droughts, or tremors in 18 years. She meets a girl from another tribe, Tutok (Ann Daniels, in her only screen appearance, it seems), and this time in 2021 I thought "oh, how modern to insinuate a lesbian relationship in a Hollywood 1964 movie", but, no, Karana treats her dog as passionately as she begs Tutok to stay with her in the island. (Karana neither ages, now that I think of it...) However, and despite the glamourization of Juana María's hard true story, the 1964 movie corresponded well to the ways of the hippie generation, so I suppose that is why it was well received. It might be appealing to millennials too, I think, for all the animals, healthy diets, open door activity and (forced) uprightness around.

I liked the movie well enough, considering it came from 1964. I felt that they didn't depict the passage of time very accurately and I was surprised when all of a sudden, the movie was over. I know that books and movies are usually very different, but I think this movie could have been a far better representation of the book. Add some more details, don't change some of the details from the book. But hey, I'm not the director or in charge of the budget. That is the other thing to consider, budget. They didn't have big budgets back then and this was what they got for their budget. All in all, I enjoyed the movie well enough. I would enjoy seeing a remake with some better details, more representative of the book. Still an OK movie though.

ISLAND OF THE BLUE DOLPHINS by Scott O`Dell was a novel that my class had to study for a project when I was eleven years old . We had to come up with things like " What would you have as a food menu if like Karana you were stuck on an island " and we also had to write a story as to how we thought the novel would end . Being a massive fan of monsters I wrote an ending that featured a great battle with the " Devilfish " which is - While not referred to in the book as such - in reality a giant squid

The giant squid features in several passages in the book and I looked forward to seeing the movie version simply because I wanted to see how realistic the special effects team could handle this endevour , I mean a convincing giant squid is very difficult to realise on screen especially before the technique of CGI . Unfortunately when the end titles ran I was still excitedly waiting for a giant squid to turn up and was slightly disgusted when it didn`t appear . You could argue that the producers had the right idea by not attempting the difficult task of bringing a squid to screen since its appearences in the book don`t affect the plot , but this movie version of ISLAND OF THE BLUE DOLPHINS is very bland , slow moving and in need of some excitement , an excitement that would have been helped by a giant squid