In London, the pregnant wife of an industrialist falls down the stairs, loses her sight and has no recollection of the events but suspects that a mentally traumatic experience prior to the f... Read allIn London, the pregnant wife of an industrialist falls down the stairs, loses her sight and has no recollection of the events but suspects that a mentally traumatic experience prior to the fall caused her accident.In London, the pregnant wife of an industrialist falls down the stairs, loses her sight and has no recollection of the events but suspects that a mentally traumatic experience prior to the fall caused her accident.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Nominated for 1 BAFTA Award
- 1 nomination total
Curd Jürgens
- Eric Crawford
- (as Curt Jurgens)
Rex Garner
- Waiter
- (uncredited)
Pat Hagan
- Diner in Restaurant
- (uncredited)
Victor Hagan
- Diner in Restaurant
- (uncredited)
Aileen Lewis
- Lady in Teashop
- (uncredited)
Edward Malin
- Attendant in Men's Room
- (uncredited)
Jack Mandeville
- Man Exiting Lift
- (uncredited)
Louis Matto
- Waiter
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Allison Crawford is blind, though there's nothing physically wrong with her eyes. What did Allison see that was so shocking it mentally snapped her vision closed?
This concept alone opens up lots of possibility doors and windows. However, the screenplay writer Julian Zimet decided to go for the weakest of the scenarios available. When the mystery is revealed, though you've probably worked it out well before then, you may feel a little letdown... I know I did.
I don't know if this is the same climax the Francoise Des Ligneris novel has, not having read it, but it could have been a little stronger and believable. This, however, is a small point as the direction and the acting should have you hooked before you get close to the ending.
Alexander Singer uses his cast well and isn't adverse to use them to create a few iconic shots. Some nice close-ups are stronger thanks to the casts acting skills. You can see the worry, the concern, the cunning, and the realisation on their faces. I have to admit I still believe both Patricia Neal and Ian Bannen are miss-cast. They are both good in their portrayals but don't quite hit the mark. It's Samantha Eggar who steals the show as the cunning and oh-so-sexy and sensual sister, Robin. I have to say I even loved the sci-fi reading Grandma played brilliantly by Beatrix Lehmann. Though it's Curd Jurgens as Eric Crawford who surprised me the most. Being the crux of the story, you would have thought it strange for him to be cast as this type of character. But he comes across as strong and reassured that I could believe the notion thoroughly.
This is a good film that verges on greatness. If the story had been reworked a little tighter and the Neal and Bannen characters had been better cast, well, who knows? As it stands though, I would gladly recommend the film to all lovers of mysteries, thrillers, and dramas alike. This is a nice way to spend a wet Sunday afternoon. Along with with your beloved, a warm fire, and a tipple of one kind or another.
This concept alone opens up lots of possibility doors and windows. However, the screenplay writer Julian Zimet decided to go for the weakest of the scenarios available. When the mystery is revealed, though you've probably worked it out well before then, you may feel a little letdown... I know I did.
I don't know if this is the same climax the Francoise Des Ligneris novel has, not having read it, but it could have been a little stronger and believable. This, however, is a small point as the direction and the acting should have you hooked before you get close to the ending.
Alexander Singer uses his cast well and isn't adverse to use them to create a few iconic shots. Some nice close-ups are stronger thanks to the casts acting skills. You can see the worry, the concern, the cunning, and the realisation on their faces. I have to admit I still believe both Patricia Neal and Ian Bannen are miss-cast. They are both good in their portrayals but don't quite hit the mark. It's Samantha Eggar who steals the show as the cunning and oh-so-sexy and sensual sister, Robin. I have to say I even loved the sci-fi reading Grandma played brilliantly by Beatrix Lehmann. Though it's Curd Jurgens as Eric Crawford who surprised me the most. Being the crux of the story, you would have thought it strange for him to be cast as this type of character. But he comes across as strong and reassured that I could believe the notion thoroughly.
This is a good film that verges on greatness. If the story had been reworked a little tighter and the Neal and Bannen characters had been better cast, well, who knows? As it stands though, I would gladly recommend the film to all lovers of mysteries, thrillers, and dramas alike. This is a nice way to spend a wet Sunday afternoon. Along with with your beloved, a warm fire, and a tipple of one kind or another.
Allison Crawford (Patricia Neal) is a happy mother of two. She is blind. She lost her memory of the incident and the blindness may be all in her head. Her husband Eric Crawford (Curd Jürgens) seems supportive. Her younger sister Robin (Samantha Eggar) comes for a visit.
I like the opening premise. I really like Robin flirting with Eric right in front of Allison. I wouldn't mind them stuck together and cook like a simmering stew. Instead, they get split up and that energy dissipates. Patricia Neal tries. Samantha Eggar does her sex kitten best. Curd Jürgens gets pairs up with a dud. The nice simmering stew becomes a boring mess as the filmmaker keeps stirring and adding poor ingredients. By the time they reunite with a couple of other characters, the movie has lost the intensity and it could not regain it.
I like the opening premise. I really like Robin flirting with Eric right in front of Allison. I wouldn't mind them stuck together and cook like a simmering stew. Instead, they get split up and that energy dissipates. Patricia Neal tries. Samantha Eggar does her sex kitten best. Curd Jürgens gets pairs up with a dud. The nice simmering stew becomes a boring mess as the filmmaker keeps stirring and adding poor ingredients. By the time they reunite with a couple of other characters, the movie has lost the intensity and it could not regain it.
As had so often been the case in the past the best thing about Alexander Singer's "Psyche '59" is Walter Lassally's luminous cinematography. This British drama revolves around Patricia Neal, blinded in an accident but aware that her blindness is psychosomatic and not physical. She's married to Curd Jurgens and has a flightly younger sister, (Samantha Eggar), who comes to stay. There's a fourth character played by Ian Bannen who wanders in and out of their lives.
The movie wasn't a success despite its excellent cast and has virtually disappeared. Singer came to the film fresh from his cult classic "A Cold Wind in August" and perhaps more was expected of him than he delivered. It doesn't really work as a thriller; plot-wise it's something of a one-trick pony and outside of its cast of four there is no-one to latch on to and consequently few red herrings. It might have worked as a tale of sisterly rivalry if it wasn't so banal and what almost amounts to a subplot involving Bannen's character almost proves more interesting.
It's not really a bad film, (though the ending is gob-smackingly awful), just a very strange one and it's easy to see why it flopped. It's the kind of film that might appeal to the so-called intelligensia looking for meanings that aren't really there. See it by all means; just don't expect too much.
The movie wasn't a success despite its excellent cast and has virtually disappeared. Singer came to the film fresh from his cult classic "A Cold Wind in August" and perhaps more was expected of him than he delivered. It doesn't really work as a thriller; plot-wise it's something of a one-trick pony and outside of its cast of four there is no-one to latch on to and consequently few red herrings. It might have worked as a tale of sisterly rivalry if it wasn't so banal and what almost amounts to a subplot involving Bannen's character almost proves more interesting.
It's not really a bad film, (though the ending is gob-smackingly awful), just a very strange one and it's easy to see why it flopped. It's the kind of film that might appeal to the so-called intelligensia looking for meanings that aren't really there. See it by all means; just don't expect too much.
Françoise des Ligneris's novel "Psyche '59" becomes a fine dramatic vehicle for the always-sympathetic Patricia Neal, here playing the wife of a wealthy businessman who is suffering from 'hysterical blindness' after a mysterious fall; when sister Samantha Eggar comes to live with her after a failed attempt at marriage, years-old tensions (both resentful and sexual) between Eggar and brother-in-law Curt Jurgens rise to the surface. As photographed in glossy black-and-white by the esteemed Walter Lassally, the picture is a shiny, classy piece of goods, yet director Alexander Singer takes an awfully long time to warm up. The plot (or rather, the point inherent to the plot) doesn't make itself known for at least an hour into the proceedings, while the pretty images and visual tricks eventually become a nuisance. Singer doesn't appear to wrap things up cohesively with his finale, yet it's actually his best bit: Neal's mental handicap and Eggar's need to be the proverbial thorn in the rosebush are dealt with in solely visual terms, and the silent emotions released are triumphant. A near-miss, but worthwhile for fans of psychological melodramas verging on soap opera. **1/2 from ****
"Psyche '59" opened at an art theatre in New York City in 1964. Receiving lukewarm reviews, it closed quickly, and was then used as a co-feature in neighborhood theatres. I consider it a near-masterpiece. Starring Patricia Neal, Curt Jurgens, and Samantha Eggar, it is a spellbinding study of a woman suffering from hysterical blindness, her sex addict husband, and her younger sister, who it seems was sexually imposed-upon at a young age, and who is both cruelly nymphomaniacal and masochistic as a result. This film was clearly ahead of its time.
The screenplay by Julian Zimet, from a novel by Francoise des Ligneris, is a finely-nuanced piece of work.
Alexander Singer might be considered a great director of films about women's issues, as well as a great director of actresses. Consider his direction of Lola Albright in "A Cold Wind in August" three years before, and his direction of Lana Turner in "Love Has Many Faces" the year following. The fact that all three of these films were failures is clearly the reason why Singer is not widely known ("Love Has" having failed simply because its critics and audiences could not appreciate its deliberately melodramatic style).
The cinematography in "Psyche '59" is outstanding. One shot, in which the camera manages to look upward towards Samantha Eggar, while she is lying on the sand, took my breath away. Within the context of the scene, this use of strange camera angle was intensely effective, and not at all pretentious. Whether it was Singer's idea, or that of cinematographer Walter Lassally, I guess I'll never know.
The only flaw in "Psyche '59" is that the actress in the role of the grandmother seems too young for the part.
The screenplay by Julian Zimet, from a novel by Francoise des Ligneris, is a finely-nuanced piece of work.
Alexander Singer might be considered a great director of films about women's issues, as well as a great director of actresses. Consider his direction of Lola Albright in "A Cold Wind in August" three years before, and his direction of Lana Turner in "Love Has Many Faces" the year following. The fact that all three of these films were failures is clearly the reason why Singer is not widely known ("Love Has" having failed simply because its critics and audiences could not appreciate its deliberately melodramatic style).
The cinematography in "Psyche '59" is outstanding. One shot, in which the camera manages to look upward towards Samantha Eggar, while she is lying on the sand, took my breath away. Within the context of the scene, this use of strange camera angle was intensely effective, and not at all pretentious. Whether it was Singer's idea, or that of cinematographer Walter Lassally, I guess I'll never know.
The only flaw in "Psyche '59" is that the actress in the role of the grandmother seems too young for the part.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is the movie Neal consented to do, regretfully, after the role she wanted in The Pumpkin Eater (1964) wasn't definitely confirmed as hers; the part was given instead to Ann Bancroft, who earned an Oscar nomination for her performance.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Come to Silence with Samatha Eggar (2019)
- How long is Psyche 59?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- Das Verlangen
- Filming locations
- Shepperton Studios, Studios Road, Shepperton, Surrey, England, UK(studios: made at Shepperton Studios, England)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.66 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content