Seven Up!

And that's how the astonishingly thought-provoking and five-decade spanning "Up" documentaries series started, a TV odyssey following the lives of a dozen of British boys and girls with one episode every seven years, the most recent one was "56 Up" and it was released in 2012 and always directed by Michael Apted (with the exception of the first episode from 1964). What a concept!

Indeed, it's not much about these boys and girls that it is about time and life, the real protagonists, heroic, neutral or villainous depending on the circumstances or each life's narrative. But don't pay too much attention to my praises, I've only seen the first episode so far, yet I find the concept extraordinary and riveting on an emotional level. And for that, I'm glad I bumped into that "Siskel& Ebert" show that covered the "35 Up" episode of 1991 which made me immediately think, "wait? Such a documentary existed and I never heard about it?" As far as I was concerned, the groundbreaking creation on that subject was Richard Linklater's "Boyhood", you know "12 years in the making" was I fooled? That this series is so unknown is beyond me.

So, I didn't hesitate one second and started my journey with the documentary and now, I've just finished the 1964 episode. I can't say I remembered all the names but I identified the "archetypes"! a lonely child from an isolated village, a little tough one who likes fighting and jumping all around, three kids from the upper class who certainly talk better than many adults today, one girl who practice ballet and is quite disciplined, other girls who are more playful etc. But I wasn't exactly taking notes, I just let the flow of images operate and I'll leave that up for the next chapters to put the right names on the right faces. It's got to be a slow process and we have plenty of time (five decades is quite a lot, isn't it?)

Now, watching the film, I noticed how not so different kids have always behaved, they are from my father's generation (he was 9 in 1964) but listen to them talking, listen to the boys whining about girls constantly screaming, or girls about boys immaturely fighting, listen to them talking about rich people or the lack of education; the vocabulary might change from one generation to another, or place to place, but the core of childhood is there. Childhood is defined in very simple terms, there's no room for complexity, you fight to express disagreement, you play to have fun, you work because you have to, you sleep at specific times, you respect the authority or you don't, but each department of life doesn't leave you with many choices. Yet, there's no doubt that childhood is perhaps the most crucial part of one's life, the one that hits it or breaks it. Some would say youth but teenage behavior is also forged by childhood memories (I expect the next chapter to cover that).

So you better not ruin your childhood, and the maxim about "men at seven" is true. It has been demonstrated by psychologists that after six or seven, you can't change the core personality of your kid, Daniel Goldman's "Emotional Intelligence" dedicates a whole chapter for fear and shyness, explaining that you can cure a child from his insecurities before the age of six. And speaking from my own experience, I can say my personality started at seven, I started reading comic books, playing games, drawing much better than my friends, being aroused by the artistic and intellectual stuff, it was in 1989, the year where I also started wearing glasses. At six, I was painfully shy but I could triumph over it, but at seven, I started to behave like I would usually do. Some parts were accidental; others under one's influence. See, my mother was a teacher in my school so the day I wanted to have fun with boys and pick on girls, my teacher took me and said that she would tell my mother if I did that again. I feared the authority, I couldn't help it. I became a "good boy" (sigh).

But I'm not saying I enjoyed the film because it echoed my own memories, but because it plays like the perfect set-up to a series of discoveries, some you know to be happy and some sad. The film shows kids from rich or poor neighborhoods, public or private school, boys', girls' or mixed schools, cities or farms, different backgrounds, different personalities and different prospects. One wants to be a missionary to civilize Africa, some know they will leave school at the age of 15, some girls wants only two children, a kid doesn't want any. I didn't know how to feel because they were so young, I was like "why are you closing so many doors, life is so full of opportunities" but maybe it is not, maybe it's true that the die are cast from the start and it's only out of a defensive mechanism that we try to set ourselves goals, and the more definite vision a kid has about the future, the happier he or she will be. I don't know how true it is, I just expect the next episodes to come with a load of surprises, to prove me wrong or tell me something I didn't know... and I naturally wish them the best.

(On a side note, the film was made in 1964 at the peak of the Beatle-mania, and I can't resist quoting John Lennon: "Life is what happens when you make plans", these kids talk a lot about life and future, but they'll soon discover that life is a series of random stuff happening for better or worse, they're called circumstances, they're too young to realize it. At seven, I didn't either. At least, the rules are the same for everybody.)

I've read about this series elsewhere and was always curious to see it. Thanks to an internet movie rental chain I've now seen 7 Up and 7 + 7, and the rest of the series is queued up and ready to ship. I can't wait.

Viewers who are not used to the various English accents will likely be struggling to understand what some of the kids are saying in the first movie, 7 Up, but it's a short film, and deserves repeated viewing. My vague memories of previous reviews of this series suggest that this may be the most lighthearted of the series. While it is fascinating for many reasons, it is also vastly enjoyable just for the experience of the 7 year-olds' high spirits and humor.

It's jarring when you get your first look at 7 + 7, which revisits most of the kids 7 years later. Their individuality, only hinted at in the first movie, is obvious in these now-14 year-olds. As a parent I feel that familiar combination of the sadness at the loss of the child and anticipation of the future adult. Here we run through this in a matter of minutes.

As it stands now, the series goes as far as 42 Up, somehow turning these frolicking little kids into my peers in the space of a few hours. (I've always been a sucker for special effects.) This series is unlike anything that came before it, and while a quick scan of titles suggests that it's been imitated since, I'm waiting to see what happens to this particular group.

First, let us focus on the The Title's content and context:

SEVEN UP, here, does not refer to a Soft Drink.... But rather, to a carefully conceived and executed Documentary where, beginning at SEVEN Years of age, a somewhat large assorted group of British Kids, from disperse social classes and backgrounds will be interviewed and asked the exact same set of questions at SEVEN Year intervals... Pretty much for the remainder of their time on Planet EARTH!

Defined on IMDb as a documentary, this seems, to me at least, closer to a reality TV show, in its focus, execution and style! Certainly, for a project conceived and initiated WELL OVER half a century ago, it was, undoubtedly, Light Years ahead of its time!!!

The basic premise, in a nutshell, was to select a group of kids that represented a cross-section of British society in the early 60's. The children were all to be the same age: 7. All of them would be interviewed and filmed answering the same set of questions and participating in the same activities every seven years. This every seven year "snapshot" would continue until the subjects were well into middle age!

At the beginning, the producers state their primary intention as "thusly allowing the viewer to watch the development of a group of children from varied backgrounds and distinct social "classes", and draw their own conclusions".... Is it just me, or does anyone else hear strains of John Lennon's "Working Class Hero" faintly in the background?

All in all, I must admit this UK doc really brings out the latent voyeur in you...(or, at least, in me, perhaps!) Directed by Michael Apted, what I found to be of most interest, to be brutally honest, were the inherent biases and preconceptions of the Interviewers/ producers/director as evidenced by both their choice of questions and subtle differences in the handling/presentation of the screen dynamic of the interviews themselves... Or, perhaps, the inherent biases and preconceptions are really mine?!?!?

My suggestion: Watch Seven Up/Seven Plus Seven and decide for yourself.

9*.....ENJOY/DISFRUTELA!

"Seven Up!" is the forty minute documentary from 1964 that stands as a prologue for the most forward thinking documentary series of all-time. The film brings together a group of surprisingly articulate seven-year-olds from a variety of backgrounds in England. Through a number of questions posed to each of the children, the audience gets the opportunity to get to know the world through these children's eyes, and often presumably through the parent's eyes and therefore only quoted through these children. Personalities more than perspectives ring through the strongest in this first film, and the glimpse at the education system circa 1964 is intriguing. Unfortunately, as "characters" that will ultimately be seen for another forty years to come, the thick accents of some of them make for a rough start. All in all this is important cinema regardless.

I get most all of my films by recommendation and this is universally the most recommended to me of those I haven't seen. The series I mean. I suppose it wouldn't make any sense at all to see them out of order so as with everyone, we all start here.

To do that, we have to place ourselves in several other worlds. I'm an American. Though I spent a few years in school in the UK, We came home when I was five and I have few memories. For Americans, England — at least the pre-Thatcher England — was a sort of fairy- tale place where privilege was sprinkled here and there and strongly supported on the backs of the relatively poor remainder because by such tax they helped define what it meant to be British.

There aren't many blanket statements that can be made of the US — and this is less true now — but it is still true that Americans define themselves in large measure against this tradition. The idea of class immobility seems a perversion of nature.

Naturally, that's at the center of how this experiment starts. I'm sure the filmmakers never intended to follow these children as markers (more than representatives) of the collapse of privilege. Not the injustice and wealth, but the willingness which Brits poured into protecting a country (twice!) against barbarians so that their rich could continue pulling the traditions along.

So start here, fellow voyager. This first installment is completely without merit except in how it sets the starting point for a voyage through the transformation of an old two-class system to a "modern" two-class one, seemingly only for the amusement of the rest of the world.

Perhaps it would have been more interesting to have selected all girls.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.