The Time Travelers
- 1h 24m
IMDb RATING
5.3/10
3.5K
YOUR RATING
In 1964, a group of scientists create a portal that takes them to a barren, mutant inhabited, Earth in the year 2071.In 1964, a group of scientists create a portal that takes them to a barren, mutant inhabited, Earth in the year 2071.In 1964, a group of scientists create a portal that takes them to a barren, mutant inhabited, Earth in the year 2071.
Wayne Anderson
- Android
- (uncredited)
William F. McGaha
- Android Technician
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.33.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Time Traveling can be a mind-warp, er, headache
The reason a film such as this (low budget '50s or '60s sci-fi) is on many viewers favorites lists is not necessarily fond childhood memories or nostalgia - it's because it's well made. Of course, they had very little money for props and such, but the story is more inventive than 95% of the stuff that's released now or has been since the nineties; no, make that the eighties. Yes, I'm one of those guys who saw it 30 years ago as a kid on TV during a Saturday matinée slot or something; but I've seen it again within a couple of years ago and it's still quite entertaining. Here, the writers proposed a question, a 'what if?' question about time travel. What if certain people, a small group of scientists, accidentally invented a time travel device? What if they used it? (Again, accidentally). What if the device short-circuited too early? What if this, what if that - and so on, with inventive answers provided to each question. If you've never seen this picture, you're in for a treat - you'll be wondering what's the next answer every 5 to 10 minutes. This is a quality sorely lacking in most films today. Maybe all the good ideas have been used. The same concept was utilized a couple of years later in the short-lived "Time Tunnel" TV series, but that show lacked the wild turns of this sci-fi set up. Some of the further situations in this story of the future are a bit goofy, but I believe it's intentional. The ending, which I won't give away here, actually puts some pressure on the viewers to wrap their minds around. Watch for famous sci-fi fan & publisher Forrest J.Ackerman in a cameo. Whatta trip!
Been a long time, been a long time, been a long lonely
Whew! Had someone remind me of this movie just recently and I
did a "Boy, did that take me back". A time travel in & of itself.
Here is one that should get released on DVD, or at least get some
TV play on a late-night show. I remember this being great fun
when I was a kid, new to the movie experience.
Yes, saw it in an actual theatre, probably the same one where I
saw "Crack in the World" (1965) with Dana Andrews. Both high in
"cheese" content, but no less fun.
Not really giving anything away, plotwise, this movie deals with our
fearless scientists who because of having the ability to time travel
into the future, try to go about changing it. Something that has been
dealt with over & over again in the ensuing years. Just remember
they are in fairly new territory here. Can one change what
"happened" in the future?
I also remember being scared witless by the mutants they run
across in the future. One guy who has legs, but no feet. You don't
have to be a rocket scientist to figure out they had an actor with
birth defects or an amputation, but to a kid in a dark theatre it
was really frightening!
Let's see if someone can get this out as a "late night" DVD, eh?
did a "Boy, did that take me back". A time travel in & of itself.
Here is one that should get released on DVD, or at least get some
TV play on a late-night show. I remember this being great fun
when I was a kid, new to the movie experience.
Yes, saw it in an actual theatre, probably the same one where I
saw "Crack in the World" (1965) with Dana Andrews. Both high in
"cheese" content, but no less fun.
Not really giving anything away, plotwise, this movie deals with our
fearless scientists who because of having the ability to time travel
into the future, try to go about changing it. Something that has been
dealt with over & over again in the ensuing years. Just remember
they are in fairly new territory here. Can one change what
"happened" in the future?
I also remember being scared witless by the mutants they run
across in the future. One guy who has legs, but no feet. You don't
have to be a rocket scientist to figure out they had an actor with
birth defects or an amputation, but to a kid in a dark theatre it
was really frightening!
Let's see if someone can get this out as a "late night" DVD, eh?
Cinematography
The one thing that struck me right away was the static camera shots. Usually just one master shot and one other angle. I thought it might be the fault of the cinematographer, but when I looked it up I found that Vilmos Zsigmond was the cinematographer on Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Witches of Eastwich which are 2 of my favorite films with stunning cinematography. Of course, made for the big screen it wouldn't be as bad as watching it on a small TV. Actually this kind of cinematography is preferable to a lot of today's films that are shot like a music video. I am sure that having a low budget is constraining to the cinematographer's creative endeavors.
Decent 1960's Time Travel film
The first time I saw this movie was on a weekend afternoon on one of the UHF stations out of Sacramento. I only saw the first five minutes or so. Up to the part where the characters actually take their first steps forward, and then the family had to go somewhere.
Throughout the years I'd catch the same beginning time and again, but was always drawn away from it.
Well, I finally saw it all last year, and where it wasn't sterling scifi fare, it was decent for a 1960s reminisce-blast from scifi film making of days of yore. Finally being able to see this full film in its entirety put a smile on my face. The same kind of feeling I got when I saw other films that I had often heard about, but had never fully seen, just bits and pieces here and there on broadcast TV back in the 70s and 80s.
But, to the movie; it's standard science fiction time travel stuff. Throw in a few mutants, some robots, and you got yourself a movie. There's a romantic subplot of sorts, some rocket ships, a fight for survival, a battle of good and evil, all the things that make great science fiction great. Only this film isn't exactly the greatest thing ever, it's just decent enough to be watchable.
Lots of basic shots, mostly standard master shots and two shots to push the narrative forward. There are no or few dramatic closeups, no rapid machinegun editing, and a score that's your standard "danger of the unknown" music so prominent of scifi of the 50s and 60s.
It's the kind of movie that someone thought would be a good thing for people to see, and that scifi aficionados like myself thought would be worth seeing once or twice. And the film delivers on that account.
I'm so glad I finally saw it after decades of just catching snippits of it. I'm not sure I'll buy the DVD or bluray to add to my collection, but I'm glad it's out there for all to see.
If you're a scifi fan, then maybe give this film a chance on the player of your choice. Enjoy.
Throughout the years I'd catch the same beginning time and again, but was always drawn away from it.
Well, I finally saw it all last year, and where it wasn't sterling scifi fare, it was decent for a 1960s reminisce-blast from scifi film making of days of yore. Finally being able to see this full film in its entirety put a smile on my face. The same kind of feeling I got when I saw other films that I had often heard about, but had never fully seen, just bits and pieces here and there on broadcast TV back in the 70s and 80s.
But, to the movie; it's standard science fiction time travel stuff. Throw in a few mutants, some robots, and you got yourself a movie. There's a romantic subplot of sorts, some rocket ships, a fight for survival, a battle of good and evil, all the things that make great science fiction great. Only this film isn't exactly the greatest thing ever, it's just decent enough to be watchable.
Lots of basic shots, mostly standard master shots and two shots to push the narrative forward. There are no or few dramatic closeups, no rapid machinegun editing, and a score that's your standard "danger of the unknown" music so prominent of scifi of the 50s and 60s.
It's the kind of movie that someone thought would be a good thing for people to see, and that scifi aficionados like myself thought would be worth seeing once or twice. And the film delivers on that account.
I'm so glad I finally saw it after decades of just catching snippits of it. I'm not sure I'll buy the DVD or bluray to add to my collection, but I'm glad it's out there for all to see.
If you're a scifi fan, then maybe give this film a chance on the player of your choice. Enjoy.
Ib never got the credit he deserved
If it weren't for Ib Melchior, Irwin Allen would never have made Lost in Space or The Time Tunnel. Yet Allen had connections so Ib mostly shut up. This, one of my three favorite time travel movies from the 60s (then others being the incomparable The Time Machine & Beyond the Time Barrier) is so well done it transcends it's low budget. Every penny is on screen. A group of scientists opens a portal into the future - a horrible one - and must find a way home.
Did you know
- TriviaThe mutants were played by members of the Los Angeles Lakers.
- GoofsWhen the characters return to their lab, they find they are unable to move any matter. Yet the characters are still able to move and breathe. If they were actually unable to affect any matter, as they clearly establish and go to lengths to explain, the air would not move out of the way when they walked nor would it move in/out of their lungs.
- Quotes
Reena: Don't you like me?
Danny McKee, the Electrician: Of course, I like you. You're a beautiful girl.
Reena: Oh, that! Beauty is only skin deep.
Danny McKee, the Electrician: Well, it's deep enough. What do you want - a lovely liver?
- Alternate versionsThe movie effectively has two different endings. In some televised airings of the film, the characters step through the time portal into a black void, which then briefly displays an image of them walking through a lush, green clearing before cutting right to the end credits. In other airings, the narrative continues by returning to the beginning of the movie, before the characters first passed through the portal. The key events of the film replay in a quick-cut montage before returning to the beginning again, indicating a time loop. This happens several more times, each cycle running faster and faster until the end credits finally roll.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Time Warp (1967)
- How long is The Time Travelers?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $250,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 24m(84 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content




