Space Probe Taurus

I've read so many bad reviews about this film that I just had to watch it when the chance arrived. It's got all the indications of being a bad film (Five aliases not withstanding: Space Probe Taurus, Space Monster, First Woman into Space, Flight Beyond the Sun and Voyage into the Sun).

Keep an open mind. Remember that American International Productions and Leonard Katzman made most of these on a shooting schedule of three weeks or less with production costs of under $50,000. (In 1965 it cost Irwin Allen $150K to produce two episodes of 'The Time Tunnel' using BackYard sets in So. Calf).

If you keep the above in mind and watch the actors carefully, it's not a bad film. Sure, by today's standard there's more melodrama than Si-Fi and yes, I didn't like the Model Rocket Ship in the Lobster Aquarium either.

Now just sit back, relax, quite looking for things to call hokie and like I said, 'Listen to the actors, try to put your self into their shoes for 80 minutes'.

The main cast were all good 'B' picture stars with the exception of the film's 'Hero' James B. Brown, (this is the same actor who brought us 'Persuit Pilot Tex' from the movie 'Airforce', also co-stared in 'Wake Island' in additions to many other fine performances) and Ms Francine York (YUM - take a look at the '02 photo of her from the DGA Tribute for George Sidney and you'll see what I mean..)

There are a few scenes that actually have some pucker factor or at the very least, will have you shouting 'Come on! Hurry Up! Get out of there before something jumps out of the shadows and GRABS you!'

All things considered, I liked it and if you do too, then count yourself fortunate. Movies are much more enjoyable if you can appreciate the efforts of all the participants. Not just the blockbusters who spent all the money and won all the awards.

Scotty Jensen

I kind of like this AIP film, despite the familiar story and cheesy special effects. One planetary body appears to be made of crumpled aluminum foil. The ship's computer consists of a wall of reel-to-reel tape recorders. The filmmakers present this low-budget affair as a serious film; the characters are very solemn and philosophical at times, which adds to the amusement value -- there's no intentional campiness here.

Some of the "what if" dialogue is actually pretty good. There's a lot of 50's-style crew banter, which fits the retro (no pun) vibe. The crew get over their differences with time, which is refreshing compared to modern films that often wallow in dysfunction. However, the (very unprofessional) ladies'-man-in-space behavior by two male characters is painfully lame.

This is decent late-night fare, so I give it four (4) stars.

This movie, with the working title of "First Woman in Space," starts with the standard voice-over, "Questioning every star". Then we get our first glimpse of the future. Spacesuits look like scuba gear. What's even better is that the traveler gets to sit in a lounge seat that looks like it's out of a library only it has seat belts from a car. Most of the instruments look like they were purchased from a 1965 Army surplus depot. One exception is the beautiful analog "Bulova" clocks. The spaceship uses reel-to-reel computer storage.

In the year 2000, on probe Taurus, we get treated to the tasty Dr. Lisa Wayne (Francine York) as the only woman on the ship, and she is told that it is not proper to have a woman aboard.

We learn a lot of space Gobbledygook... Oops, Techno talk.

I am not going to give a blow-by-blow as that is why you are watching the movie. I will say that this is a good example of a space opera. You may see an alien (no, not William Shatner) licking his lips, but Dr. Lisa Wayne is not even there. Oh, they may have a problem with crabs! What about Dr. Lisa Wayne's experiment? She states, "It's growing!"

If these crabs fascinate you then watchAttack of the Crab Monsters (1957)

Even for 1965 B movie science fiction this is weak. Go to space, sort of crash land on a planet, fight alien, leave. The male crew all looked like senior citizens, while cozying up to 30 year female scientist. But it's easy to sit through if you're tired and if it's on a no commercials channel. Even for 1965 B movie science fiction this is weak. Go to space, sort of crash land on a planet, fight alien, leave. The male crew all looked like senior citizens, while cozying up to 30 year female scientist. But it's easy to sit through if you're tired and if it's on a no commercials channel. Even for 1965 B movie science fiction this is weak. Go to space, sort of crash land on a planet, fight alien, leave. The male crew all looked like senior citizens, while cozying up to 30 year female scientist. But it's easy to sit through if you're tired and if it's on a no commercials channel. How do you get 600 words in a review for a movie that probably had dialogue of less.

People are not 'getting' this one. They see cheap props, models, and crustaceans and they inwardly groan, but let me tell you, there is definitely something here that is worth your time. A spaceship with a crew of four who have good on screen chemistry (the always alluring Francine York plays a curvaceous lady scientist) more than adequate acting, a fine and evolving character development, decent dialogue, plus the spaceship is not too bad, possessing the right amount of claustrophobia, knobs, and buttons......The pace of this film, combined with the plot and action, keeps you engaged - you really will be wondering what will happen next. Here, simplicity is a form of complexity- less is more. My one beef : I think the early encounter with the alien could have been expanded upon.. This film was made in B& W in 1965- the whole thing looks and feels like it was made in 1959 or 1960, I think this is why it has a bad reputation- people expect so much more razzle dazzle for 1965, they cant see that this is an overlooked gem born too late.