Superargo and the Faceless Giants

A hero IS nothing but a sandwich! Especially when a guy in black tights can't show off his boldness and super strength like every other comic book marvel! I'm glad I caught this obscure superhero film on late-night TV, though. In fact, SUPERARGO would have been, at the very least, a camp classic had it been aired on MST3K. It's quite a shock that movies were actually getting better by 1967, but still, this atrocious experience in crimefighting offers the "BIFF!"s, "WHAM!"s, "SOCK!"s, and "POW!"s in a distorted array of action-packed excitement. A horde of "faceless giants" goes after our demented hero, and nails them down with fists, only to make the movie look terrible. And where did the story go? If this is the kind of originality you'd expect for a movie like SUPERARGO, you'd probably think the actor wearing a red suit would've done the same like Popeye The Sailor. But this is a superhero-style movie, and it has a small hint of visual effects. It's a pity that it's no better than the famous legends of Batman & Company. Until the final round comes, this flick's gonna be knocked out cold in a matter of a first few minutes! Give it a shot if you desperately love movies without good taste.

Critics are being a bit hard on our boy Superargo. No, it isn't Christopher Reeve Superman but its special effects and fight scenes are perfectly acceptable for a late 1960s action movie -- as competent as TV heroes Batman (1966) or Wonder Woman (1977). The robot henchmen are better outfitted than Doctor Who Cybermen of the same era, and the actor portraying the titular hero fills out his costume convincingly. The plot isn't groundbreaking; mad scientists have been throwing robots at superheroes since the 1930s. But it is good, clean fun. A bit of James Bond, a bit of lucha libre, a bit of the eastern mysticism common to radio superheroes of the 1940s. It works.

Maybe if you are a teenager who likes superhero movies, you will also like this production. It's an Italian film with actors whose names have changed from Italian names to American-looking names, stupid fashion in the '60s. The only one who didn't have to change his name is Guy Madison, who is really American. The film "is related" to "Argoman the Fantastic Superman Original title: Come rubare la corona d'Inghilterra" (1967), but it's a little bit better. Not as good as "Danger: Diabolik Original title: Diabolik" (1968), with which it also has points in common. The action is super predictable and childish, as in many other genre films. The main hero, with a black mask on his eyes and dressed in a red suit molded on his body, looks embarrassing. Watch it only if you have nothing better to do!

This film is not very good, but that's not to say it's not enjoyable. This has got to be one of the lamest superheroes I've ever seen, none of his plans work and he has psychic powers but almost never uses them. His super powers include psychic power that he rarely utilizes, super strength? I cant tell if he has super strength or if he is just a stronger than average man but I think we are meant to believe he has super strength, and he can jump really high for some reason. He has this car which I actually thought was pretty neat, it's got these blades that come out of it. The villain and plot definitely dont do this movie any favors, the faceless giants definitely have faces and the villain is just some guy with glasses, not very memorable.

It's fun to make fun of the main protagonist and his sidekick friend, they both look and act ridiculous, the only way I would recommend this is with Rifftrax, they make it watchable. Without them it's still a movie I could have sat through but they definitely made is easier.

This mix of Mexican wrestling, 60s superspy & campy TV "Batman" element was probably intended for kiddie matinees. It's fun, but the relatively low production values means the means there's energy but little style, so all the running around gets monotonous after a while. I wished the lead got to take off his costume once so we could see what he looked like--this was a rare lead for an actor who usually played bit parts or did stunt doubling.

Still, I enjoyed his and the other performances; the cast seems to have been enjoying this as a lark, with the possible exception of Guy Madison. (But then he's playing the main villain, so perhaps it's just as well that he's poker-faced.) It's a goofy, silly film, with some charm. But let's face it, this sort of Italian live-action-cartoon thing is better when it's got the $$ for some visual flourishes, whether in the garishly colored lighting and production design in Bava's "Hercules in the Haunted World" or the cheesy-FX-cluttered Lou Ferrigno "Hercules" movies later on, not to mention the better Bond knockoffs.