A U.S. senator is spirited away to a secret lab after a serious car crash, and his injuries are healed by advanced medical technology. A TV reporter who witnessed the accident investigates t... Read allA U.S. senator is spirited away to a secret lab after a serious car crash, and his injuries are healed by advanced medical technology. A TV reporter who witnessed the accident investigates the senator's disappearance and uncovers a plot.A U.S. senator is spirited away to a secret lab after a serious car crash, and his injuries are healed by advanced medical technology. A TV reporter who witnessed the accident investigates the senator's disappearance and uncovers a plot.
- Adams
- (as Richard Simmons)
- Dr. Keating
- (as Tris Coffin)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
30 years later, same debate.
Further reflect on recent cloning advances. What if you could clone a human, with no brain? (It is an unfortunate condition that occurs occationally in humans. The offspring die shortly after birth.) Would it be moral to use their bodies to extend your life?
Conehead Clones
Small in scale, and more akin to the production values of a telemovie than a fully fledged feature film, there are however some assets in the cast and one or two plot twists to which you can look forward. Dillman as the title character spends most of his time comatose and then in a wheelchair debating scientific heresy, while Dickinson looks more like a space cadet than the dedicated doctor, who believes her work is of national significance. Nielsen is essentially the central character, a tenacious reporter not content to digest the force-fed facts without due interrogation. He spends most of the film, piecing together evidence that eventually leads him to the mysterious clinic in New Mexico. Noted stage actor Daly is also quite effective as the clinic's principal surgeon; his attempt to rationalise the existence of the coneheaded clones (called Somas) lies more in the field of fantasy than it does in any serious debate on human cloning.
Well scripted, with okay special effects, concerned mostly of pale-faced make-up on stupefied faces - the Dillman zoo experiment is unintentionally funny, his 'full retard' no doubt perfected by hours of rehearsals and takes. Dressed in monk-like garb with coneheaded frontal lobe projection, the Somas are also quite inspired imagery; more emphasis on their existence might have balanced the argument better, but their brief inclusion is still an alarming visual demonstration of the human harvesting process depicted in the film. Despite its 100 minutes, there's ample action, characterisation and plot development; had the climax resolved more satisfactorily, the film might have become a minor cult favourite, ahead of its time in terms of content. As it is, a worthy sci-fi companion, and perhaps no longer such a distant prospect.
For the SF completist
This film is worthy of interest mostly for the ideas presented and because of its descendants in the genre: Coma (1978), Clonus (1979), The Island (2005). I have only seen such poor camera-work done in the worst of B-movies, however. No prizes here for visuals, which are remarkable for their lack of art or ability. Seriously, the average person with a cellphone camera and no training could do as good or better job at framing a scene. The acting is serviceable, TV-style of the period, and fans of Leslie Nielsen will enjoy an early performance from him.
This review is not a raving recommendation. Serious SF fans and film collectors will not be disappointed to have Resurrection in their collections. Others should steer clear.
Surprising suspenseful, timely topic ...
A film way ahead of it's time !
I just read your review of "The Resurrection of Zachary Wheeler" posted 15th of June, 2005 . Wow ! You have no idea how that made me feel. I don't know why I typed that old title into Google, maybe just boredom or some weird ego trip, but I am one of the writers of that screenplay along with my then writing partner Jay Simms . It all started with my reading an article in Esquire magazine regarding the possibility of organ transplants . At that time I was working as a Production Coordinator on the TV series " Big Valley" and I mentioned it to Jay who was one of the writers and before we knew it we came up with the idea for a screenplay. It took about 3 weeks and when we finished it we gave it to Jays' agent who said " It's too far out". That turned out to be the general consensus and both Jay and I went on to different things . Eventually it was bought and produced with a very small budget, very evident in the final version but it did have a "far out" premise. I never wrote another screenplay but went on to a career as a film editor but deep down there lurks a frustrated writer. Who knows, maybe I'll try it again. Glad you liked what you saw and you're right, with a few more bucks it could have been a "killer" !
Regards,
Tom Rolf
Did you know
- TriviaCited as the first U.S. made example of the videotape-to-film process.
- Quotes
Cab Driver: Where to, Mister?
Harry Walsh: How far to the library?
Cab Driver: About six miles.
Harry Walsh: I'll give you ten bucks if you get me there in five minutes.
Cab Driver: That's what I call a real thirst for knowledge!
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Resurrection of Clayton Zachary Wheeler
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 40m(100 min)
- Sound mix







