IMDb RATING
5.3/10
2.5K
YOUR RATING
Two girls on the run get lost in the French countryside, and wind up in a haunted chateau occupied by an ailing vampire and his servants.Two girls on the run get lost in the French countryside, and wind up in a haunted chateau occupied by an ailing vampire and his servants.Two girls on the run get lost in the French countryside, and wind up in a haunted chateau occupied by an ailing vampire and his servants.
Marie-Pierre Castel
- Marie
- (as Marie Pierre Castel)
Mireille Dargent
- Michelle
- (as Mireille D'Argent)
Agnes Jacquet
- La première victime des vampires
- (as Agnès Jacquet)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.32.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Requiem for a Vampire
Requiem for a Vampire (1973)
*** (out of 4)
Erotic-horror from French master Jean Rollin about two fugitive girls (Marie-Pierre Castel, Mireille Dargent) who are on the run from the law and end up in a creepy castle where many young women are chained in the basement. The girl's learn that vampires run the castle and they want the two ladies to join the undead since they are virgins. With countless horror and porn titles under his belt, to me this is the best that Rollin has to offer as his art-house style perfectly blends in with the erotic nature of the subject matter and best of all is that the film never once feels too long nor does the pacing have any issues. One might say THE LIVING DEAD GIRL is the best the director has to offer due to how violent and gory it is but I think on the whole this here is the best. I think what works so well is once again that beautiful atmosphere that the director is able to bring. The movie really does feel as if you're watching a nightmare as there's this quiet, still atmosphere that really makes you feel as if you're in the land of the dead. I thought the opening fifteen or twenty-minutes is where the director really works his magic because we see the girls on the run, going through the county side and eventually arriving at this castle. I thought Rollin did a very good job at building up this atmosphere and things just turn downright crazy once the vampire enter the picture. The highlight of the film is a rather long sequence where several of the male vampires go into the basement and attack the women that are chained up. Full nudity galore as this sequence clocks in at nearly ten-minutes and it's nothing more than the men groping the woman and I'm certain this was done so that the male viewers could get more than just a eye-full. This sequence is tinted in this strange pink/rose color and it really adds to the film and the downright surreal nature is just untouched by anything else in the film. The rest of the movie deals with the women trying to decide if they should give in or not and of course there's more violence and nudity. I thought both Castel and Dargent were very good in their roles and the supporting cast isn't too bad either. They're all certainly a lot better than you'd normally see in a film like this. Those unfamiliar with the work of Rollin will probably find this one of the easiest of his films to get into and those just wanting to see some nudity and erotic stuff will find plenty here.
*** (out of 4)
Erotic-horror from French master Jean Rollin about two fugitive girls (Marie-Pierre Castel, Mireille Dargent) who are on the run from the law and end up in a creepy castle where many young women are chained in the basement. The girl's learn that vampires run the castle and they want the two ladies to join the undead since they are virgins. With countless horror and porn titles under his belt, to me this is the best that Rollin has to offer as his art-house style perfectly blends in with the erotic nature of the subject matter and best of all is that the film never once feels too long nor does the pacing have any issues. One might say THE LIVING DEAD GIRL is the best the director has to offer due to how violent and gory it is but I think on the whole this here is the best. I think what works so well is once again that beautiful atmosphere that the director is able to bring. The movie really does feel as if you're watching a nightmare as there's this quiet, still atmosphere that really makes you feel as if you're in the land of the dead. I thought the opening fifteen or twenty-minutes is where the director really works his magic because we see the girls on the run, going through the county side and eventually arriving at this castle. I thought Rollin did a very good job at building up this atmosphere and things just turn downright crazy once the vampire enter the picture. The highlight of the film is a rather long sequence where several of the male vampires go into the basement and attack the women that are chained up. Full nudity galore as this sequence clocks in at nearly ten-minutes and it's nothing more than the men groping the woman and I'm certain this was done so that the male viewers could get more than just a eye-full. This sequence is tinted in this strange pink/rose color and it really adds to the film and the downright surreal nature is just untouched by anything else in the film. The rest of the movie deals with the women trying to decide if they should give in or not and of course there's more violence and nudity. I thought both Castel and Dargent were very good in their roles and the supporting cast isn't too bad either. They're all certainly a lot better than you'd normally see in a film like this. Those unfamiliar with the work of Rollin will probably find this one of the easiest of his films to get into and those just wanting to see some nudity and erotic stuff will find plenty here.
Definitely not "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer"
This is not Jean Rollin's best film, but it might be his most essential one for fans because it combines the moody visuals of films like "Fascination" and "Two Orphan Vampires" with the perverse softcore sex of films like "Bacchanales Sexuales". Two teenage virgins run away from a school party (which in the strange Rollin universe somehow involves dressing as clowns, having a shoot-out with police, and disposing of the body of their dead male accomplice in a burning car). After a bizarre accident while walking through a graveyard that almost results in one girl being buried alive, they arrive at a deserted castle and do what any two virgins would do in a 70's Eurohorror/sex movie--strip off all their clothes for some hot lesbian action. Soon though they meet the occupants of the castle who are, of course, vampires. Freely rewriting the vampire rulebook, Rollin's vampires in this movie can not pass their curse on to anyone except virgins. Any non-virgins are chained to the wall while the monstrous man-servants have their way with them in gratuitous sex scenes before the female vampire suck their blood from their breasts and the male vampire changes into a bat to commit an act of bestiality that no pervert in the world would find erotic (you have admire the sheer audacity of Rollin if nothing else).
The conflict happens when one girl decides to lose her virginity while the other decides to preserve hers and join the ranks of the living dead. But the bonds of love and friendship are not easily broken. This movie addresses some real themes of coming-of-age and friendship (albeit in a fantastical and at times ridiculous milieu), but no one will confuse it with "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer". If you're looking for sex,on the other hand, you certainly won't be disappointed, but unlike all the erotic vampire movies they churn out these days, this is a vampire film with a lot of sex, not a sex film with vampiric trappings. And there is something very personal and obsessive about Rollin's films that the modern-day hacks can never hope imitate. This movie contains all manner of memorable images--preserved human arms holding candles, posed skeletons dressed in clerical robes, a girl in a mini-skirt lying on a coffin being buried alive by oblivious gravediggers, a girl clamoring around the ruins of a Gothic castle dressed in nothing but knee socks. Good or bad, Rollin is definitely a one-of-a-kind filmmaker.
The conflict happens when one girl decides to lose her virginity while the other decides to preserve hers and join the ranks of the living dead. But the bonds of love and friendship are not easily broken. This movie addresses some real themes of coming-of-age and friendship (albeit in a fantastical and at times ridiculous milieu), but no one will confuse it with "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer". If you're looking for sex,on the other hand, you certainly won't be disappointed, but unlike all the erotic vampire movies they churn out these days, this is a vampire film with a lot of sex, not a sex film with vampiric trappings. And there is something very personal and obsessive about Rollin's films that the modern-day hacks can never hope imitate. This movie contains all manner of memorable images--preserved human arms holding candles, posed skeletons dressed in clerical robes, a girl in a mini-skirt lying on a coffin being buried alive by oblivious gravediggers, a girl clamoring around the ruins of a Gothic castle dressed in nothing but knee socks. Good or bad, Rollin is definitely a one-of-a-kind filmmaker.
First disappointing Rollin movie I've watched.
'Requiem For A Vampire' is the first disappointing Jean Rollin movie I've watched. It starts off beautifully enough with two girls made up as clowns fleeing a scene which we are later told was a murder. Desperate and hungry they wander the countryside looking for food and shelter. Most of these early sequences feature very little dialogue, and are beautiful and haunting. Both the girls themselves and the landscape they inhabit are perfect and typically Rollinesque. Eventually the girls look for sanctuary in mysterious and apparently abandoned castle. This is where their troubles really begin, because it is inhabited by a vampire and his entourage who force the girls into luring men to their doom. It's around this point that the movie falls apart for me I'm afraid. I that the movie is listed as having a runtime of 95 minutes. The DVD version I watched clocked in at around 75. I can only assume that the footage I missed would have salvaged this one from mediocrity. There was very little nudity, which is unusual for Rollin, and I saw virtually no "Sadeian sex" that the back cover blurb mentioned. I can only comment on the cut I saw (released by Salvation, who are normally very good), and this version was weak and uninspiring. I hope one day to see the complete version and that it is up to the usual high standards of Rollin who has become a great favourite of mine.
Early Jean Rollin Is Not as Good
I have come to the conclusion that this director maintained his own style yet evolved over the years of his film making. Lips of Blood is excellent if not fully coherent, but Requiem for a Vampire - in the same series as The Shiver of the Vampires - is an excuse to make stylish erotica, including controversial scenes of sexual assault.
The first half of this film is mainly a stream of consciousness flow of beautiful and striking images, while the second half is more focused on sadism and nudity.
Two teen girls who were apparently employed as clowns (remember: performance art careers like being a mime, including studying the art at colleges, were still common circa 1970s France) have since fallen into a life of crime, quite spontaneously. The audience is never informed of what exactly happened, but the viewer can imagine something along the lines of a bank robbery or other forms of grand theft, leading to a car chase and a shoot out. Their driver and male companion is murdered in the process, while the girls escape. They burn his body along with their vehicle to hide evidence.
It is made evident that these aren't innocent victims, so this film borders on later morality horror seen in slasher films from the 1980s in the US. They are bad girls, seducing men so that they can steal food and cigarettes, gleefully enjoying the process until they realize they're sleeping rough in a cold rural cemetery.
Stumbling upon the ruins of a chateau, the girls are spooked by the rotting corpse of an apparent suicide victim whose face has been eaten by birds while the body hangs limply from a rope. Stupidly, they waste ammunition on shooting at the corpse, highlighting their youth and immaturity (or maybe just an excuse for Jean Rollin to film gun shots?)
It is all downhill from there, when they encounter the rapey vampires.
The first half of this film is mainly a stream of consciousness flow of beautiful and striking images, while the second half is more focused on sadism and nudity.
Two teen girls who were apparently employed as clowns (remember: performance art careers like being a mime, including studying the art at colleges, were still common circa 1970s France) have since fallen into a life of crime, quite spontaneously. The audience is never informed of what exactly happened, but the viewer can imagine something along the lines of a bank robbery or other forms of grand theft, leading to a car chase and a shoot out. Their driver and male companion is murdered in the process, while the girls escape. They burn his body along with their vehicle to hide evidence.
It is made evident that these aren't innocent victims, so this film borders on later morality horror seen in slasher films from the 1980s in the US. They are bad girls, seducing men so that they can steal food and cigarettes, gleefully enjoying the process until they realize they're sleeping rough in a cold rural cemetery.
Stumbling upon the ruins of a chateau, the girls are spooked by the rotting corpse of an apparent suicide victim whose face has been eaten by birds while the body hangs limply from a rope. Stupidly, they waste ammunition on shooting at the corpse, highlighting their youth and immaturity (or maybe just an excuse for Jean Rollin to film gun shots?)
It is all downhill from there, when they encounter the rapey vampires.
Surreal film
This film was rated higher by others than I would have thought. Vampires usually do a lot of biting and blood sucking. There was more erotic virgin handling and molestation than biting and the like in this one. The use of silence in the film gave it a surreal quality. The whole movie was dream-like. The lure of the victims was not captured. The chase and seduction is the best thing about vampires but those subtleties were lost here. But, I must admit, the film did remind me of Vampyros Lesbos and, to a lesser extent, Suspiria. I must state that vampire films do not have to be bloody etc. But a little blood at the bite would have been welcomed. Not a bad watch if you seek those who walk at night.
Did you know
- TriviaJean Rollin claimed to have written the treatment in one impromptu burst, stacking incidents on top of each other with little care for plausibility or any other connective tissue.
- GoofsAt the beginning, when the clowns are pouring the gas over the dead friend, you can see him move several times, including twitches and breathing.
- Alternate versionsThe film was rejected for UK cinema by the BBFC in 1972. It was finally released on video in 1993 by Redemption after extensive cuts of 6 minutes 55 secs to heavily edit shots of chained women in a cellar being stripped and raped by vampires, and a scene where Marie is whipped by Michelle.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Celluloid Horror (2004)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Caged Maidens
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 5m(65 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.66 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content








