IMDb RATING
5.5/10
2.3K
YOUR RATING
Three rich trustees are murdered, but their deaths appear to be suicides. When a bus filled with orphans and three other rich trustees has an "accident," Colonel Bingham investigates.Three rich trustees are murdered, but their deaths appear to be suicides. When a bus filled with orphans and three other rich trustees has an "accident," Colonel Bingham investigates.Three rich trustees are murdered, but their deaths appear to be suicides. When a bus filled with orphans and three other rich trustees has an "accident," Colonel Bingham investigates.
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Three trustees of the Van Traylen fund have died suspiciously during the last nine months. A bus load of the trust orphan kids are almost killed. Police Colonel Bingham (Christopher Lee) suspects that someone wants the trust money for themselves and he recruits Dr. Ashley (Peter Cushing).
This sets up an interesting mystery. It also has yet another pairing of Lee and Cushing. It could go somewhere with these ingredients. Instead, it gets tied down by one child's story and other characters doing the investigating. It seems to meander in circles for the first act. Most of that section with Peter is unnecessary. He's better off as a random doctor given her case. Lee and Cushing are moving at a snail's pace. They should be Sherlock and Watson but they are too far behind the audience. They come off looking clueless or somewhat uncaring. They take way too long to get to the orphanage. Anna Harb is a more interesting character. At least, she's more active and more invested. Finally, there are the kids. I don't know if the child actors are any good. The movie needs them to do more. They need to get into this movie sooner, front and center. They are the children of the bus. That's a better title.
This sets up an interesting mystery. It also has yet another pairing of Lee and Cushing. It could go somewhere with these ingredients. Instead, it gets tied down by one child's story and other characters doing the investigating. It seems to meander in circles for the first act. Most of that section with Peter is unnecessary. He's better off as a random doctor given her case. Lee and Cushing are moving at a snail's pace. They should be Sherlock and Watson but they are too far behind the audience. They come off looking clueless or somewhat uncaring. They take way too long to get to the orphanage. Anna Harb is a more interesting character. At least, she's more active and more invested. Finally, there are the kids. I don't know if the child actors are any good. The movie needs them to do more. They need to get into this movie sooner, front and center. They are the children of the bus. That's a better title.
Rich men are dying, with no especial connection save they are all trustees for a young girl. Colonel Christopher Lee thinks that's the connection, so he contacts Peter Cushing, because they haven't made a movie together in a month.
Diana Dors appear is this movie, looking a trifle pudgy, alas. She's the mother of the girl, fresh out of prison, ten years after committing a triple murder. Newspaper woman Georgia Brown is trying to get the trust broken, because everyone's in favor of mother love, aren't they? But why did a bus driver die, burnt to a crisp in a bus crash, when there was no fire?
It's a nicely produced movie, but it holds few surprises in its story for the modern viewer. The casting is pretty good, with Michael Gambon giving his second big-screen appearance, but the genre was getting pretty tired by this point.
Diana Dors appear is this movie, looking a trifle pudgy, alas. She's the mother of the girl, fresh out of prison, ten years after committing a triple murder. Newspaper woman Georgia Brown is trying to get the trust broken, because everyone's in favor of mother love, aren't they? But why did a bus driver die, burnt to a crisp in a bus crash, when there was no fire?
It's a nicely produced movie, but it holds few surprises in its story for the modern viewer. The casting is pretty good, with Michael Gambon giving his second big-screen appearance, but the genre was getting pretty tired by this point.
Despite the interest naturally fostered by co.starring Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing, it's the remarkable supporting cast including Fulton Mackay and a young Michael Gambon and a lot of vivid female characters (including a stylish Georgia Brown as the dogged newspaper reporter and Diana Dors in a brown wig in one of her eccentric later character roles; and Kathleen Byron, wasted as usual) that really captures the imagination
SLIGHT SPOILER COMING: There being nothing new under the sun, the final 'revelation' may be anticipated by anyone who remembers the Sherlock Holmes mystery 'The House of Fear' (1945), here given a supernatural tweak...
SLIGHT SPOILER COMING: There being nothing new under the sun, the final 'revelation' may be anticipated by anyone who remembers the Sherlock Holmes mystery 'The House of Fear' (1945), here given a supernatural tweak...
I think this movie was the premis for the modern movie Get Out. It's too coincidental not to be. That being said it's not a bad movie. A little slow until the end but worth the wait. It's more mysterious than horror until the conclusion. If you're a Cushing fan I think you'll like it.
I don't think this film is as bad as it's been suggested. If you go in viewing it more as a mystery than expecting faced paced horror from the start, I think it's enjoyable...it just requires some patience. The ending rewards you if you allow yourself to stick with it.
Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing do their best with a less than great script, but it's important to keep in mind that most novel-to-screen adaptations do suffer badly, and I think this is more the case here. Gwyneth Strong does an amazing job as Mary Valley, and it makes me curious to see what other work she's done.
If you find a bargain DVD of this one, or see it on late night cable, give it a shot. And if you're a fan of British horror like I am, it is always great to have a visit with Lee and Cushing once again!
Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing do their best with a less than great script, but it's important to keep in mind that most novel-to-screen adaptations do suffer badly, and I think this is more the case here. Gwyneth Strong does an amazing job as Mary Valley, and it makes me curious to see what other work she's done.
If you find a bargain DVD of this one, or see it on late night cable, give it a shot. And if you're a fan of British horror like I am, it is always great to have a visit with Lee and Cushing once again!
Did you know
- TriviaThis was the only movie produced by "Charlemagne Films," which was created by Sir Christopher Lee and Anthony Nelson Keys.
- GoofsWhen Joan Foster speaks about the tape recording to Sir Mark in the boathouse, where he is carrying out an autopsy on the dead trustees, Sir Mark is clearly sampling parts of a real, dead octopus rather than a prop human organ.
- Quotes
Sir Mark Ashley: The nature of the killing points to one thing: ritual murder.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Katarina's Nightmare Theater: Nothing But the Night (2011)
- How long is Nothing But the Night?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Resurrection Syndicate
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content