Gawain and the Green Knight

A bored and listless viewer sat through a boring and listless movie today. As others before me have said, I waited in vain for the Monty Python troupe to come charging out of the bushes and breathe a little life into the proceedings. GAWAIN AND THE GREEN KNIGHT is, I suppose, an honest attempt to portray the legendary exploits of a Knight of the Round Table, however it fails to generate any excitement or even any interest in the characters. Badly acted and unconvincing combat scenes, dreary scenery and a vastly overblown musical score become tedious rather quickly. Overall, this is a real yawner by any standard one cares to apply.

I dunno why I wrote "the knights who say ni!" as my summary. I suppose it was to be creative. Anyway, this movie is very close to the original story, but another half hour of this crap I would've been ripping my hair out. Well, at least I think that is what I might have done had I not been a huge fan of Murray Head.

But Murray's the man, so I watched and I got a kick out of him running about punching people and hitting them with sticks, rocks, himself, swords, and anything else he found laying about. The cinematography is stinky and the script/ interpretation of the tale is sorta crappy. But if you like Murray, by all means go ahead and watch.

In 1973 Stephen Weeks directed the first of 2 versions of the SIR GAWAIN & THE GREEN KNIGHT saga. He would remake it 11 years later in 1984 as SWORD OF THE VALIANT. As far as I'm concerned, this first version is the best one by far. It's also the film that Monty Python took the look of their HOLY GRAIL movie from and provided its inspiration. GAWAIN & THE GREEN KNIGHT was made inexpensively but used actual locations in Wales and Cornwall to achieve its authentic look.

The story is part of Arthurian legend and first appeared in the 14th century. It concerns a squire, Gawain, who takes up the challenge of a mysterious Green Knight after none of King Arthur's knights will. The challenge involves beheading the Green Knight (at his request) after which the knight then gets to return the favor. Gawain beheads him only to have the knight put his head back on his shoulders. He tells Gawain he will wait a year to redeem his promise but Gawain must seek him out.

In addition to being a romantic tale of knightly deeds and chivalry, GAWAIN is also an allegorical coming-of-age story. We follow Gawain on his journey as he has many adventures and encounters a mysterious woman named Linet. By the time he finally encounters the Green Knight, he has changed from the callow youth who set out into a worldly wise adult who has come to realize that knighthood and chivalry aren't what he thought they were.

Murray Head does a fine job as Gawain. He engages us from start to finish as he overcomes many obstacles and discovers love and what it means to lose it. Veteran character actor Nigel Green (in his last film role) portrays the Green Knight as an imposing figure with just a touch of wry humor. Brit TV actress Ciarin Madden is the wisp like Linet who looks the epitome of the early 1970s heroine. The other significant parts are taken by well known English character actors Robert Hardy, Murray Melvin, and Ronald Lacey. The film is narrated by Ian Richardson.

Director Stephen Weeks said in a 2014 interview that he preferred the later version, SWORD OF THE VALIANT. He's entitled to his opinion but after watching the two movies, I can't understand why he feels that way. Although bigger budgeted, SWORD seems cheaper in every way with a script that borders on parody and a terrible 1980s synthesizer score. GAWAIN, unlike SWORD, was never released on home video in any form and was almost impossible to see until recently when it showed up on YouTube. You can catch it there and it should be seen as a precursor to EXCALIBUR (1981) and MONTY PYTHON & THE HOLY GRAIL...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.

holy boogers... heehee that was good. for those who havent seen this movie yet, you should try your best to try and dig it up if you're in need of a laugh... I cant figure out if the movie was just soooo bad that its funny.. or if it was TRYING to make fun of itself... the movie was awful, the fight scenes are ghastly, the acting is terrible, and its all in all a bad flick, though ive never enjoyed such a bad flick this much. i was laughing my head off at it, I cant get enough of it, my friends and i have a bad movie night every once in awhile, we watched texas chainsaw masacre the next generation and this. we all laughed ourselves silly. you must see this flick!!! Cheers

I was about six when I saw this so forgive the vagueness. It's kind of Monty Python's Holy Grail in look with a Michael "couldn't-direct-traffic-on-the-Orkney-Islands" Winner directorial style. It was so deeply bizarre that it has stuck in the memory ever since. Thinking I perhaps didn't understand it because I was a kid I asked a couple of film boffins I know, they said, "no, mate, it was a genuinely odd film." (I seem to recollect lots of misty forests, dream-like fights and a man who lived in a vat of oil in order that his genitals erode away). Anyway, I think more youngsters should be made to watch this film so that they can grow up confused and slightly warped.