Isn't It Shocking?

Yeah, that basically says it all ...

I love this movie, the interplay between Alan Alda and Louise Lasser Alone is worth the price of admission. They are absolutely Perfect for those roles.

The Murder Mystery is great, Ruth Gordon is of course her usual excellent self, especially in this role. I mean, even the deputy is beautifully acted.

There are a handful of very, Very special Telefilms that are among my favourites in over 45 years of collecting movies and such, and this is one of them (along with the brilliant 1976 'Murder By Natural Causes' starring an excellent Hal Holbrook, the 1973 Creepy and effective 'A Cold Night's Death' starring Robert Culp and Eli Wallach, and the amazingly almost unknown, deeply atmospheric 1973 'Child's Play' even though it is directed by Sidney Lumet and stars James Mason, Beau Bridges, Robert Preston, and others)

Yes, this one is Most Highly Recommended for those who like fun, and truly entertainingly well written Murder/Mystery/Thrillers. Definitely a well earned, strong '8'...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My Particular Way of Rating:

5 - Flawed, but perhaps with a little entertainment value here and there for some.

6. A decently passable story maybe worth a watch.

7. A solid film, well made, effective, and entertaining.

And, obviously, you can probably figure out what above and below these would mean... : )

An improved version of the classic, but somewhat unreal, b/w romantic murder mysteries. A 70s classic.

Can you really refuse a film with Edmund O'Brien, Ruth Gordon, Alan Alfa, Will Gerr, LIAM DUNN, LOUISE LASSER AND Lloyd Nolan?

Alan Alda: "Old people do not sleep in the nude!" How does he know? How many old people gas he slept with?

Ruth Gordon: "What kind of a pahty is this?"

So it does have some funny moments.

I've found, after seeing a dozen or so of them, that made for TV seventies horror flicks are generally good for seventy minutes of entertainment. This one looked really good considering the comments about it, so I hoped that I'd be in for one of the better ones; however, that wasn't the case. It's not that this is a bad film, but it's not all that good either and certainly isn't one of the better made for TV movies from the seventies that I've seen. The plot is interesting enough, and focuses on a small town where a bunch of old people are dying. There are certain similarities between the deaths, and it leads Sheriff Dan Barnes (Alan Alda) to investigate. The plot plods along at a relaxing pace, and there's not a great deal of suspense or interest, which is a bit of a surprise since director John Badham would go on to make the very suspenseful thriller 'Nick of Time'...though that was twenty two years later. The small town setting provides a good place for the film to take place, but this isn't taken advantage of to any notable extent, and the film simply boils down to a simple ending. Overall, this film isn't terrible; but it's not great either, and I can't really recommend bothering to track it down.

Mount Angel, a small New England community inhabited mostly by seniors, is beset with a serial killer; the bachelor chief of police and his kooky assistant figure out the murderer's motive. "Isn't it Shocking?", an ABC movie-of-the-week scripted by mystery writer Lane Slate and directed by John Badham, is full of talent, yet it fizzles out somewhere along the way. The teleplay, the handling and the performances are all offbeat, yet not odd or unusual enough; the scenario is tinged with black comedy, but it isn't funny enough; and, worst of all, there's no guesswork needed in these killings because neither Slate nor Badham is interested in making the film a mystery (the killer is revealed to us right off). Alan Alda has the perfect dryly-eccentric manner for a role like this; if he were comically frazzled, it would add too much weight to the material (he gives the proceedings the cautiously light touch it needs). But there's no sympathy for the elderly victims (the first of whom, a woman, is found stripped), and the succession of funeral services is too gloomy. Badham doesn't provide any sting (or, conversely, any dark humor) to the narrative; he's determined to bend this thing towards the bizarre but, like the pun in the title, he lacks taste and finesse.