A juror on a murder case begins to believe that the man on trial is innocent of the crime - and then discovers that the real killer is her own husband.A juror on a murder case begins to believe that the man on trial is innocent of the crime - and then discovers that the real killer is her own husband.A juror on a murder case begins to believe that the man on trial is innocent of the crime - and then discovers that the real killer is her own husband.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.6391
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
One big stinkeroo
This "movie" was incredibly painful to watch. Stilted, wooden dialogue, utterly predictable plot, lousy directing and bad camera work - in short, this thing's a train wreck.
The film possesses a strange juxtaposition of talented-but-wasted well-known actors (Leachman, Nolte, Luckinbill, Schallert) and eager-but-untalented relative unknowns. That the director approved this atrocity and that TV network executives allowed it to be aired is incredible. And now it's available on DVD - but why???
The talents of Ms. Leachman and Mr. Nolte are completely wasted. At least Ms. Leachman redeemed herself later that year (1974) in Young Frankenstein.
The film possesses a strange juxtaposition of talented-but-wasted well-known actors (Leachman, Nolte, Luckinbill, Schallert) and eager-but-untalented relative unknowns. That the director approved this atrocity and that TV network executives allowed it to be aired is incredible. And now it's available on DVD - but why???
The talents of Ms. Leachman and Mr. Nolte are completely wasted. At least Ms. Leachman redeemed herself later that year (1974) in Young Frankenstein.
Contrived, to be sure, but a fun potboiler...
Cloris Leachman plays a wife and mother about to go on vacation with her husband when she's picked for jury duty on a murder trial; naturally, she's eager to be a good citizen, becoming emotionally (and personally) involved in the legal proceedings. Aaron Spelling-Leonard Goldberg production for TV isn't a flashy vehicle for the leading actress, but it doesn't need to be. Leachman is an appealing 'ordinary' woman, a good listener with a compassionate nature, and both her home life and her dedication to finding the truth in the murder case are engaging. Nick Nolte has an early role as the accused killer, and Laurence Luckinbill is appropriately smug as Leachman's spouse. The plot, adapted from the novel "After the Trial" by Eric Roman, is far-fetched, but waiting to see how writer John Neufeld and director E.W. Swackhamer work out all the angles is entertaining.
Death Sentence adequate for title
I bought this DVD for $.88 and has Nick Nolte larger on the cover than Cloris Leachman. The mistress' acting in this movie was so bad I was delighted she was offed quickly. During the court scenes I kept hoping to maybe see a flashback or two of Nolte and his relationship with the deceased, but nope .. then again as I said, her acting was so bad anyway, I gave up caring. What little lines they handed out for Nolte were disappointing. Cloris Leachman appeared pained in struggling to give each and every one of her lines as if to say, "Nobody could be this dimwitted."
When Lawrence Luckinbill, Leachman's husband in the movie was preparing to strangle her, I was almost hoping the movie was going to improve. What little of Nolte was in this movie, the only thing that was on my mind was if he was wearing a wig or not since the hair didn't move when his forehead moved. Pass on this one folks .. it is so bad it qualifies for its' own death sentence.
When Lawrence Luckinbill, Leachman's husband in the movie was preparing to strangle her, I was almost hoping the movie was going to improve. What little of Nolte was in this movie, the only thing that was on my mind was if he was wearing a wig or not since the hair didn't move when his forehead moved. Pass on this one folks .. it is so bad it qualifies for its' own death sentence.
But, Angel, we are happily married!
Cloris Leachman is, as far as I'm concerned, the uncrowned queen of 70s TV movies. Of course, she also starred in bigger cinema productions (including the films of Mel Brooks) and even won an Oscar for "The Last Picture Show", but for me she remains the star of very exciting TV-movies such as "Dying Room Only", "Hitchhike!", "Haunts of the very Rich", and many others. "Death Sentence" also belongs in this list, and although the film gets a lot of harsh reviews around here, I found it very suspenseful, identifiable, and compelling.
Leachman was not the most beautiful actress of her generation, but she was a real lady with class and natural maturity. These qualities fit perfectly for her character Susan Davies, a middle-aged woman who, as a juror in a murder trial, slowly and painfully must conclude that the defendant is innocent, but that the murder of a young blonde was committed by her own loving husband.
Leachman is brilliant as the woman who is torn apart by doubt, and who slowly sees her whole life falling apart. Laurence Luckinbill is even more fantastic as her adulterous husband for whom lying and living a double life is apparently a piece of cake. The most famous name in the cast is perhaps that of Nick Nolte, as the innocent husband on trial, but his role is quite limited. "Death Sentence" perfectly illustrates why I love TV thrillers from the 70s so much. They are short (barely 75 minutes) but professionally made and entertaining.
Leachman was not the most beautiful actress of her generation, but she was a real lady with class and natural maturity. These qualities fit perfectly for her character Susan Davies, a middle-aged woman who, as a juror in a murder trial, slowly and painfully must conclude that the defendant is innocent, but that the murder of a young blonde was committed by her own loving husband.
Leachman is brilliant as the woman who is torn apart by doubt, and who slowly sees her whole life falling apart. Laurence Luckinbill is even more fantastic as her adulterous husband for whom lying and living a double life is apparently a piece of cake. The most famous name in the cast is perhaps that of Nick Nolte, as the innocent husband on trial, but his role is quite limited. "Death Sentence" perfectly illustrates why I love TV thrillers from the 70s so much. They are short (barely 75 minutes) but professionally made and entertaining.
Passable TV Mystery-Thriller
A passably entertaining made-for-TV thriller, "Death Sentence" reveals the killer in the opening scene. Laurence Luckenbill strangles his annoying blonde mistress with his own yellow scarf, because she threatened to go public with their affair, which would have destroyed his cherished family. Cut to the courtroom, where Luckenbill's wife, Cloris Leachman, has been accepted as a juror in the trial of Nick Nolte, who is on trial for the murder of his wife, the woman that Luckenbill killed in the opening scene. If the premise sounds a bit far fetched, it is, not to mention the murdered woman preferring Luckenbill to the young Nolte. Based on the novel After the Trial, the film cuts back and forth between the courtroom testimony and Leachman's domestic scenes with her husband and children. As the testimony progresses and evidence is presented, Leachman slowly suspects her husband's involvement.
The performances are uneven; Leachman is good as the wife, intently listening to witnesses, while slowly connecting the dots. However, Luckenbill, the family-values man, overacts at times, and poor Nolte sits looking at his hands for most of the movie, until he provides brief testimony in his own defense. Director E. W. Swackhamer keeps the proceedings moving fast enough to distract viewers from the inconsistencies and gaps in logic. Absolutely no motive or evidence are presented to implicate Nolte, other than the malicious dislike of his mother-in-law and unreliable claims from a nosy neighbor. Leachman's suspicions are all circumstantial, and some of her actions are completely implausible. However, for non-demanding viewers with an hour or so to kill, "Death Sentence" is decent entertainment, if they just go with the flow and do not ponder the details.
The performances are uneven; Leachman is good as the wife, intently listening to witnesses, while slowly connecting the dots. However, Luckenbill, the family-values man, overacts at times, and poor Nolte sits looking at his hands for most of the movie, until he provides brief testimony in his own defense. Director E. W. Swackhamer keeps the proceedings moving fast enough to distract viewers from the inconsistencies and gaps in logic. Absolutely no motive or evidence are presented to implicate Nolte, other than the malicious dislike of his mother-in-law and unreliable claims from a nosy neighbor. Leachman's suspicions are all circumstantial, and some of her actions are completely implausible. However, for non-demanding viewers with an hour or so to kill, "Death Sentence" is decent entertainment, if they just go with the flow and do not ponder the details.
Did you know
- TriviaDuring the trial, before the jury has even begun to deliberate, Mrs. Davies refers to Mr. Bracken as the foreman, but they are normally not voted in as such until both the prosecution and defence have rested. It could be, however, that in some cases, the foreman or forewoman is chosen right from the start, or appointed by the judge.
- GoofsIn the courtroom scene during Mrs. Boylan's examination, masking tape can be seen on the floor of the set to mark where the actors should stand. The tape is not there in any other scenes.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- After the Trial
- Filming locations
- South Pasadena Public Library - 1100 Oxley St, South Pasadena, California, USA(El Centro St entrance, as courthouse)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content







