Gina

Denys Arcand's "Gina" (1975) is a film that defies easy categorization. It's a vengeance thriller fueled by a brutal assault, set against the backdrop of a bleak Canadian winter and interwoven with a social commentary on labor exploitation. While undeniably compelling, "Gina" stumbles with uneven pacing and a tonal shift that may leave some viewers wanting more.

The film centers around Gina, a captivating yet vulnerable stripper (Céline Lomez), forced to perform at a seedy motel. Her arrival coincides with a documentary crew exploring the harsh realities of a local textile mill. Interweaving documentary and fictional elements, Arcand paints a picture of a community struggling with economic hardship. This social commentary adds depth, but can feel disjointed at times.

The narrative takes a sharp turn when Gina is attacked by a group of snowmobile-riding thugs. This brutal scene is unflinching and sets the stage for Gina's chilling quest for revenge. Arcand masterfully utilizes the desolate winter landscape, creating a sense of isolation that amplifies the film's emotional impact. However, the pacing can feel slow, particularly in the first act, as the film establishes its characters and setting.

The true strength of "Gina" lies in its exploration of female agency. Here's a woman wronged, who refuses to be a victim. She seeks out a notorious Montreal gang to enact her revenge, a decision fraught with danger and moral ambiguity. Lomez delivers a powerful performance, capturing Gina's vulnerability, resilience, and steely resolve.

The final act explodes with a brutal and bloody showdown, complete with a show-stopping snowmobile chase. This visceral sequence is undeniably thrilling, but feels somewhat tonally incongruous with the film's more measured social commentary.

"Gina" is a fascinating and flawed film. It's a must-see for fans of Canadian cinema and those interested in a unique take on the revenge genre. However, viewers seeking a consistently paced and tightly focused narrative may find themselves wanting.

I recently came upon this film and recognized the director Denys Arcand's name from the highly praised but controversial Jesus of Montreal, a movie about a modern telling of the Passion Play.

This was made fourteen years earlier by Arcand and it is much different from his later work.

A stripper named Gina is working at a club while at the same time a film crew is making a documentary about a labor dispute at a textile factory.

I am aware of our union struggle here in the United States but I know very little of a similar history of our neighbors to the north.

Some of the story uses black and white imagery during interviews with the textile workers and the style reminded me of John Sayles work in Matewan, another excellent film.

Gina is an unexpected little gem.

After long and careful consideration, I don't see any other option than to categorize this film in the league of "interesting failures", otherwise known as the "Yes but No" category. "Gina" is a curiously compelling and unique film, but I can't possibly describe it as good or recommendable. This movie serves the weirdest combo of topics that I have ever seen; seriously. It's a harsh social drama, criticizing the harsh labor conditions and low wages of people working in contemporary textile factories in Canada, but simultaneously it also builds up towards a typically mid-70s Rape & Revenge exploitation thriller.

Gina, a strong and independent exotic dancer moves to a remote Vancouver community where everybody works in the nearby textile plant. In the bar/motel where she works and lives, Gina befriends a film crew that is shooting a documentary on the unfair working conditions at the factory, but she also gets frequently confronted with drunk, depressed, and aggressive local males.

There's an uncannily captivating atmosphere in "Gina" that keeps you glued to the screen, but there honestly isn't happening anything at all throughout the first complete hour. To illustrate this: the film features how four people play a game of pool from start to finish, or endlessly drive around on snow scooters. Only the climax becomes reasonably eventful, with a stoic gang rape and a brutal retribution aboard an abandoned ship.

(*) User-comment title inspired by the lyrics of Falco's "Jeanny"

To the best of my knowledge, there is no English version of this film, aside from subtitles, which I had to find on the internet (my DVD was completely in French), thus dooming this film to a higher level of obscurity than it deserves. It's a good movie and, while some might write if off as an exploitation flick, it's a little more cerebral than that and deserves a little more credit. The general bleakness and crumminess of the hotel and the town itself were things I could really relate to and the way that all the characters are portrayed as victims of some sort of oppression beyond their control provides a nice commentary on the human condition that I appreciate seeing in a film. There are no real winners in Gina and it is not a feel-good film by any means, nor is it a bummer, either. Everyone is getting screwed by someone and everyone is making do with their lot in the best way they know how in a manner that I think rings true with a lot of people, and then you get the treat of an over-the-top shlock-fest of an ending that is the icing on the cake. They certainly don't make them like this anymore and, if you are like me and despise most of the garbage movies they put out these days but loved the trash from the 70's and 80's, this one will not disappoint. A great film and worth seeking out.

In the 1970's, in Quebec, everybody's was making movies? Don't have a budget, don't have a story, don't have actors? Who cares? Let's make movies! There were good ones : Mon oncle Antoine, JA Martin photographe, Les Ordres. But there were the bad, and the very very very bad. The bad ones have all the elements of Gina : lousy French speaking, men drinking beer all the time, vulgarity, very cheap settings. Viewing this, it's hard to believe that Denys Arcand will become one of the finiest movie director of Canada in the 1980's. But it's got the elements of a Arcand film. Perhaps it was fine to watch this in 1974 : today, it's seems very old and very boring.