The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith

This film from 1978 as directed by Fred Schipisi of SIX DEGREES fame and of Thomas Keneally's book - he wrote SCHINDLER'S LIST - is a grim and disturbing depiction set during colonial 19th century Australia of a young Aboriginal man's descent into frustrated violence against his white English landowner masters. It becomes a really brutal film with explicit axe murders, especially against young girls and older women, and it is this visually distressing depiction that ultimately alienated the cinema audience. Jimmy's humiliation and cruel treatment is equally explicit and it is a relentless string of unhappy experiences by his inhumane 'boss' that ultimately causes him to crack - and hack. As a novel it is all in the mind of the reader but as a cinemascope color film, the 'running amok with an axe' sequences make any crowd want to run from the cinema. It was not seen on TV in Australia for almost 20 years and it is not likely to be either without most of the violence cut out, thus blunting the heavy handed message and the ultimate impact. Like poor Jimmy himself, the film version is in no man's land either. Past all that, it is a well made film and with an excellent cast; but very tough going. It fits well into a series of very sharply observed Australian films depicting the British colonial mind and its misunderstanding or cruelty towards Aboriginies: JEDDA in 1956, WALKABOUT in 1970, this film in 1978, RABBIT PROOF FENCE in 2001 and THE TRACKER in 2003. Each and every one are unique and excellent in their story. This one however, is the most violent which does derail its message. White urban Australia run amok is hilarious in a 1966 comedy THEY'RE A WEIRD MOB or demented boozy antics in THE ADVENTURES OF BARRY MCKENZIE in 1972... and alarmingly, horrifyingly realistic, soaked in beer bullets fists and dead kangaroos blood in Ted Kotcheff's superb 1971 drama OUTBACK. See the lot! It is a head-shaking but enlightening string of films, especially if seen in chronological order....like we all did! (may explain why our film makers in the 90s made musicals)

"The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith" was part of the Australian "New Wave" of the seventies and eighties, and like a number of other New Wave films ("Manganinnie", "Picnic at Hanging Rock", "Breaker Morant", "Gallipoli", "The Man from Snowy River") it deals with the country's history. It is based upon Thomas Keneally's novel of the same name, which based on actual events which occurred in 1900. Two young Aboriginal brothers, Jimmy and Joe Governor, and their accomplice Jack Underwood, carried out a number of robberies and murders, killing a total of nine white people. After a manhunt Underwood and Joe were killed by the police and Jimmy was captured and later hanged.

Jimmy Governor is here renamed Jimmie Blacksmith. He is of mixed race, clearly intelligent, and reasonably well educated, having been brought up by a clergyman and his wife. He even marries a white girl. (Unlike South Africa and the American South, Australia had no taboo against racial intermarriage- in some circumstances it was even encouraged). Because of the racism which was endemic in Australian society at this period, however, Jimmie discovers that white people are unwilling to treat him as an equal. He is cheated and exploited by his employers and treated as barely human. Furious at his mistreatment, Jimmie snaps. He, along with his brother Mort and their uncle Tabidgi, declares war on white society and goes on a rampage that leaves several people dead.

On its release in 1978, the film was acclaimed by the critics, but was a box office flop in Australia. Possibly audiences were dissuaded from seeing it by its reputation of graphic violence, or possibly Australians did not want to be reminded of their country's racist past. The film's financial failure led to its director, Fred Schepisi, leaving Australia to work in Hollywood.

In Britain the film's reputation was a strange one. Although the British Board of Film Censors had passed it for screening, uncut, in 1978, before 1984 the BBFC only had jurisdiction over films shown in cinemas, not over video releases. When the early eighties saw a widespread moral panic about violent videos, "The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith" was branded a "video nasty", by the Director of Public Prosecutions and placed on a banned list meaning that video copies could be seized by the police, even though it could quite legally be shown in cinemas. The film found itself in some strange company. Most of the other films on that blacklist were just exploitative schlock, the cinematic equivalent of junk food, but Schepisi's film was a serious piece of film-making, an attempt to examine the social and psychological causes of violent crime. Schepisi (who wrote the script and acted as producer as well as director) was not trying to excuse Blacksmith's crimes, still less to revel in them as the makers of many video nasties did, but he was trying to understand the social forces which could drive an intelligent and seemingly promising young man to murder and robbery. He is assisted by an excellent, and very powerful, performance from Tommy Lewis in the central role. Forty years on from the video nasty panic, we can perhaps appreciate Schepisi's intentions more clearly. 7/10.

I have seen this several times and it remains the best film I've ever seen about racial oppression. White Australians are shown to be so deeply convinced of their own superiority they can only see Aborigines as half-human good for nothings. This is the story of a hal-aborigine raised by missionaries who tries and fails to be integrated into white society - even into it's fringes. Everything works here: performances, photography which captures something of 19th century Australian paintings, great music that evoked the tragedy of Jimmy's plight, and intelligent script and direction. The build up to Jimmy's explosion is perfectly sustained, and the violence unforgettable.

This is a fine example of the breed of excellent Australian films released in the 1970s during the Australian film renaissance (it's interesting to note that virtually all of the directors of these films, including director Fred Schepisi, later moved to the U.S. to make big budget Hollywood films). This tale of a young aboriginal man who eventually turns to violence following one humiliation after another by white settlers in 19th century Australia asks some very uncomfortable questions of the audience such as: Is it morally justified to use violence against a corrupt, racist, violent system in which there are no lawful means to receive justice? Additionally, it is up to interpretation whether the violent reactions of the title character are justified: we are clearly sympathetic to him in the beginning, but once he perpetuates incredible brutality on the settlers, can we remain sympathetic? He is definitely not a monster, but a well-mannered and educated Aboriginal brought up by missionaries. After all, his actions are not simply heat-of-the-moment reactions; he has formally "declared war" on the perpetuators of injustice. Does that legitimize what he is doing? The U.S. has been asking itself these exact same questions for the past 50 years: Jimmy is very much a close Australian cousin to Bigger Thomas, the main character in Richard Wright's classic American novel "Native Son" - a black man pushed to violence by virtually every aspect of white society.

However, like Wright, I admired director Schepisi's decision to carefully straddle the line between whether Jimmy can be viewed as a simple societal construct or whether he is a man in control of his own actions. One could easily make a case for either of these scenarios or probably both of them. That makes the movie even more uncomfortable when one thinks about it afterward.

In many ways, this is a very depressing movie; in the end there is no closure, no justice, and nobody has learned a damned thing, except possibly the audience, if they truly think about what they have just seen. I really respect filmmakers who tackle incredibly difficult subject matter such as this, with moral quagmires and complex characters. My only complaint is that it is very difficult to understand much of the Aussie English, so an American viewer must listen very closely. This is a film definitely deserving of a U.S. audience. Too bad that its controversial (i.e. thought-provoking) nature has probably prevented it from being released on VHS or DVD in the U.S. I understand copies of this are quite rare abroad, as well, so I suggest viewing it if given the opportunity.

Well intentioned and well meant, I am sure, but director Fred Schepisi is perhaps a little too reverent in his interpretation of the original book to the detriment of a smooth and effectively flowing cinematic narrative. There is an awful predictability here and for a lengthy film not really enough for the viewer to get their teeth into. It is true that the violent incident that transforms the action does come as a surprise in so far as the extent of the violence is concerned but it is something that has been signalled for a while. Beautifully shot, this is an attractive looking outback and countryside that is presented but the film is preceded by Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975) which is far more beautiful overall and Walkabout (1971) which is far more dramatic. Jimmie Blacksmith has some fine sequences portraying the indigenous peoples but less maybe is more and these do not seem as dynamic as those in Nick Roeg's film. it is tempting to wonder just how much Schepisi was influenced by the rock formations and aboriginal depiction in the earlier films but it seems a little unfair and if the political and racial issues are a little heavy handed is to be applauded that he tackled them at all.