IMDb RATING
5.8/10
3.7K
YOUR RATING
An American couple in England stumble upon a rambling mansion where a number of powerful individuals have been summoned by its patriarch regarding the home's legacy.An American couple in England stumble upon a rambling mansion where a number of powerful individuals have been summoned by its patriarch regarding the home's legacy.An American couple in England stumble upon a rambling mansion where a number of powerful individuals have been summoned by its patriarch regarding the home's legacy.
Featured reviews
Enjoyed this film though I've seen this story before. Most of the acting was good, especially Elliott, Ross and Daltrey in a small role. Charles Gray though plays the same role in every part he plays and Hildegard Neil is criminally underused. In all a decent effort.
The first time I ever saw this one, I must have been barely in my mid-teens. And I didn't like it very much (hey, I preferred my horror filled with slimy monsters and lots of blood & gore back then). But some things about this movie stuck with me over the years (especially the infamous 'tracheatomy-scene' did, amongst other things). And I just knew that was a good thing. So you could say I was ready for a more "mature viewing" of this movie. And yes, it's actually pretty good! I didn't mind it was a bit slow during the first half, because it builds up a good atmosphere wrapped in a fine mystery. Some people in their user-comments called it a "haunted house movie", but that couldn't possibly be further from the truth, as far as I'm concerned. It's a film about the supernatural, yes, but the only 'haunted house'-related thing it does have, is indeed one big, creepy looking mansion on an isolated location on UK grounds. Margaret Walsh (played by a beautiful looking Katharine Ross) is summoned to the UK for an architect-assignment. Her friend Pete (Sam Elliot) accompanies her. Circumstances lead her to the aforementioned mansion, where she is obliged to stay the weekend. Then 5 other guests arrive and they all seem to know why they are there, but Margaret doesn't. It's up to her and Pete to find out, because it doesn't take long before the guests start dying one by one. And something inside the mansion isn't willing to let her go... That's really all you need to know before going into this movie. The death-scenes aren't particularly gory, but they were sort of original at the time (1978), and there's even a catch to them... Very happy I did finally re-watch this film, as I seem to have slightly misjudged it in my teen-days.
An excellent little movie, though it might be wasted on anyone likely to get disappointed by 1970s special effects or confused by the intrusion of a plot. It's a well-made supernatural re-working of Agatha Christie's "And then there were None" (Originally "Ten Little Nigger Boys") and starts when the descendents of a 17th century witch gather at an English country house in the hope of receiving part of the family legacy. Instead, they get a dose of poetic justice delivered from beyond the grave. Don't expect to be scared out of your skin, just entertained for a while.
I like this potboiler. There's a soft spot in me for this story, even though it features the occasional lapse in narrative logic, and the special effects--while serviceable--don't guarantee it will leave much of a cinematic impression in many people's memory, years down the line. The Legacy is passed down by a moribund multi-millionaire, Jason Mountolive, to a group of inheritors (most of them European) who have travelled from afar to reunite for Jason's last 'will and testament.' Maggie Walsh and boyfriend Pete work together in Los Angeles as interior decorators (what's the likelihood of that?). They are hired sight unseen by a British client and, soon, 'accidentally' meet Jason, and are invited to stay at his home. At Ravenshurst mansion, the inheritors drop like flies, and Jason begins to get a little warmed over--he appears to be melting, cataracts appear, and he's definitely in dire need of a manicure. Clearly, this horror film was inspired by The Omen and, likewise, features a few Rottweilers that help take care of impending 'business' matters... Time to feed the dogs!!!
I'll start by saying, I'm a big fan of this film, and have enjoyed watching it many times over the years. As a teen I can remember this regularly being on The BBC late on a Friday night.
By today's standards of course it's tame as a horror, but look beyond that and it's actually a really clever, very well acted movie.
The story itself is very dark, any film that involved the Devil would be.
I love the village scenes, when Maggie and Pete try to escape in the car but are trapped and always end up back at the house, it's so clever.
It feels very Agatha Christie from the odd, and there are definitely elements of And then there were none, one by one the gathered guests start to die. Unfortunately the film doesn't have the claustrophobia that Agatha Christie had in abundance in her book.
It's looks stunning, that's the films biggest strength, the house looks incredible, Roger Daltrey's own place.
It isn't particularly scary, but it has its moments, I can remember having a few bad dreams about the mirror scene (I was only about 9 or 10.)
I particularly liked Katherine Ross, there was a soft sincerity about her, I also really liked Margaret Tyzack's cat nurse.
It's a very decent film, it creaks in parts, but on the whole it ticks a lot of boxes, I just love the nostalgia.
8/10.
By today's standards of course it's tame as a horror, but look beyond that and it's actually a really clever, very well acted movie.
The story itself is very dark, any film that involved the Devil would be.
I love the village scenes, when Maggie and Pete try to escape in the car but are trapped and always end up back at the house, it's so clever.
It feels very Agatha Christie from the odd, and there are definitely elements of And then there were none, one by one the gathered guests start to die. Unfortunately the film doesn't have the claustrophobia that Agatha Christie had in abundance in her book.
It's looks stunning, that's the films biggest strength, the house looks incredible, Roger Daltrey's own place.
It isn't particularly scary, but it has its moments, I can remember having a few bad dreams about the mirror scene (I was only about 9 or 10.)
I particularly liked Katherine Ross, there was a soft sincerity about her, I also really liked Margaret Tyzack's cat nurse.
It's a very decent film, it creaks in parts, but on the whole it ticks a lot of boxes, I just love the nostalgia.
8/10.
Did you know
- TriviaActor Sam Elliott (Pete Danner) and actress Katharine Ross (Margaret Walsh) met and fell in love when they co-starred in this movie. They married in 1984 and are still together.
- GoofsWhen Sam Elliot's character takes a shower and breaks the glass door to avoid being burned with the hot water, his back gets hurt and bleeds, but when Katharine Ross's character comes into the bathroom, Sam's back is completely clean.
- Quotes
Margaret Walsh: I know. I've got the power.
Pete Danner: Yeah I know you have. Now what are you going to do with it?
Margaret Walsh: Anything I want.
- Alternate versionsUS theatrical cut is 100 min. and British theatrical cut 102 min.
- How long is The Legacy?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Tajanstveno nasledstvo
- Filming locations
- Loseley House, Guildford, Surrey, England, UK(Mountolive's Manor House-exterior and interior)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,500,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $11,364,985
- Gross worldwide
- $11,364,985
- Runtime
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content