IMDb RATING
5.1/10
8.4K
YOUR RATING
A pair of adventurers try to track down an ancient Aztec/Mayan/Egyptian/Apache hoard of gold.A pair of adventurers try to track down an ancient Aztec/Mayan/Egyptian/Apache hoard of gold.A pair of adventurers try to track down an ancient Aztec/Mayan/Egyptian/Apache hoard of gold.
Juan Jaramillo
- Tough Guerilla
- (as Juan Garcia Jaramillo)
Miguel Ángel Fuentes
- Big Man
- (as Miguel Fuentes)
Featured reviews
I actually think this movie is Norris's best effort to date. I enjoyed it. The interplay between him and Gossett was good stuff and it didn't have much of the martial arts nonsense I hate so much. I give it a 9 out of 10. I liked the story and to me, Chuck was funny. He's a far better actor than Seagal, but then, who isn't? It's kind of a pity Chuck didn't continue along the lines of this movie and went in other directions. None of which, in my opinion, were as entertaining. As a rule, I never watch any movies made by Martial arts people turned "actors" but I made an exception for this one and was pleasantly surprised. Not a classic by any means, but worth watching.
"Firewalker" is more than a bit of a mess. Like most movies from the Cannon studio, it's not low budget enough to dip into Ed Wood land, but not well done enough to rise to a major studio production. The sets are cheap and the story is not much more than a vaguely connected series of scenes referencing better films--but I think the filmmakers were well aware of these and other shortcomings and set a self effacing, tongue in cheek tone from the start. Though as sloppy and slapdash as most of director J. Lee Thompson's other 80's efforts, "Firewalker" shows Thompson turning these attributes to his advantage and giving us a breezy, goofy, self-aware-yet-totally-clueless, low budget pop culture gem. I don't think anyone was under the impression that they were making the next "Raiders of the Lost Ark," they just wanted to give us some old fashioned fun. I mean, an Academy Award winner costarring with CHUCK NORRIS? How could it not be great in its own way? And while we're on the subject, this is one of the few films where you couldn't call Norris "Old Stone Face." In this film Chuck gives one of his liveliest, most natural performances ever--almost charming. Too bad he didn't work with Thompson more often.
The special effects for this one are (what can I say?) missing, but the story-line is interesting, and the cast obviously had fun making this film.
The problem most viewers would have with this is that it's not a karate flick (sorry). No, this one is an adventure comedy. As for not being Abbott and Costello, nobody but the incomparable Bud Abbott and Lou Costello could be. What we have here are reluctant, but trusting, partners. This story revolves around a long-lost mythical treasure (Romancing the Stone?), guarded by a demigod with supernatural powers (Jewel of the Nile?).
Take the kids and have a good time.
The problem most viewers would have with this is that it's not a karate flick (sorry). No, this one is an adventure comedy. As for not being Abbott and Costello, nobody but the incomparable Bud Abbott and Lou Costello could be. What we have here are reluctant, but trusting, partners. This story revolves around a long-lost mythical treasure (Romancing the Stone?), guarded by a demigod with supernatural powers (Jewel of the Nile?).
Take the kids and have a good time.
I personally love this movie. I think the interaction between Norris and Gossett is hilarious. Quite a few of the fight scenes are really funny, while still showing good action. One of the best things about this movie is that Chuck Norris isn't perfect in it. His character fights very well, {the karate sequences are excellent} but he can't hit the broad side of a barn with a gun, and isn't particularly bright.
For those that hadn't figured it out, this is intentional. I found the imperfect Chuck to be a delightful part of this movie. I thought it was a great spoof of the treasure hunter movies. and it's tongue in cheek approach was very refreshing.
For those that hadn't figured it out, this is intentional. I found the imperfect Chuck to be a delightful part of this movie. I thought it was a great spoof of the treasure hunter movies. and it's tongue in cheek approach was very refreshing.
In addition to being for the entire family, Firewalker is a roller coaster ride that will leave you wanting more. Hold on to your seats, folks, because this movie's actions sequences will leave you breathless. It has it's highs and lows -- it's ups and downs. And at the end, you may not be able to say that you can walk through fire, but at least you'll be able to say that you've seen the firewalker.
And don't take my word for it! The Sixty Second Review called it "Dazzling" and "Action-packed."
Go out and rent it today!
And don't take my word for it! The Sixty Second Review called it "Dazzling" and "Action-packed."
Go out and rent it today!
Did you know
- TriviaChuck Norris and Louis Gossett, Jr. have their stars back to back on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
- GoofsThroughout the movie, Coyote's eye-patch switches from one eye to the other.
This movie is a comedy.
- Alternate versionsTV versions omit the scene in Max's apartment and the fight sequence in the burnt-out town.
- How long is Firewalker?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- Feuerwalze
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $8,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $11,949,484
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $4,130,323
- Nov 23, 1986
- Gross worldwide
- $11,949,484
- Runtime
- 1h 45m(105 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content