Necromancer

Okay,this film started out OK.....it was pretty spooky, and gave you the feel of actually being there,and being in that gypsies little baracade.... I thought cool,and it was an OK movie... Why you wander??Well...Elizabeth Cayton,gives a surpisingly great performance,and hell yeah blonde suites her fine, anyways back to the subject,as the film progresses,and the revenge begins to take place,the shower and bedroom scene are interesting,but you wouldnt believe what the demon looks like,ill give you a little hint,it looks like Elmo with computer digitized,really fake green eyes,thats when i burst in tears from laughing... Then the film kinda gets back to a serious verve,as she gets help from Ernest,and he well...doesnt quiet make it! Why i liked it??Cause the Elmo look alike didnt turn up,it was the gypsy herself... The death scenes were mostly really sad shadow deaths,one was really disturbing,that elmo thing was practically busting his balls! the film than progresses to where it is Cayton VS Evil Cayton,and its a very sadistic fight,where they just strangle each other,and the hardcore death appears........but which Cayton is it???Remotely interested??Go watch it.. Its a great film to watch late at night alone,and ignore the monster,just keep in the basis of the demon and witchery and you should quiet enjoy it!

Is it worth the rent? Well...its worth the try,you either like it or not,and to me i liked it,kinda borderline,but i recommend you check it out!

Is it Something you can watch over and over again?? Well....No,not really,2 times should be enough,then you'd be bored outta your boots!

Rating out of 10? Well fairly confusing,and pathetic special effects,good acting,and some great nude scenes,and you can get a few chills,i repeat a very few.

5 out of 10

While I am all for cheesy 80s horror movies and taking movies for what they aim to do and not comparing them with classic films, this one just doesn't cut it. I guess some find the main actress to be attractive, I don't. Unfortunately she is the only one who several nude scenes. The problem of course is that when all the victims are male there is not possibility of of having more female characters to put in the nude. The special effects are not very good even for the standards of the time, nor is there any suspense or excitement. The idea is not bad overall, a supernatural revenge thriller. However, the resolution of it all is just too forced and unsatisfying. The performances are atrocious except for Charles DeLonge.

A college student is attacked by a handful of men on campus and, with the help of her friend, she calls upon a necromancer to help her get revenge on them.

Necromancer can seem almost painfully low budget at times. There's just enough of a budget to almost deliver the gory goods, but it always seems to cut away just before it's going to get good, leaving it feeling more like an edited for TV version of a much gorier film. There's plenty of nudity however (including a lot of surprise male nudity).

Acting is about what you'd expect from a film of this sort. It's never brilliant, but it's not terrible either. Russ Tamblyn seems to be having fun as a perverted theatre professor. Necromancer still offers the viewer a lot of fun along the way and it moves at a decent clip.

"Necromancer" is a sort of slasher, a sort of revengeploitation flick, and a sort of demonic possession horror movie. One thing's for sure, though, it's a full-fledged hoot of an 80s low-budget crowd-pleaser! That's how I experienced it, at least, because most of the other reviews I read around here are harsh and negative. Of course the special effects are poor, and the demonic green eyes look ridiculous! Just don't allow this to ruin the fun, that is my advice!

Super smoking hot college student Julie (80s horror babe Elizabeth Kaitin of "Nightwish", "Silent Madness", and "Friday the 13th: Part VII") gets raped and kind of blackmailed by the school's resident bullies. Since her musician boyfriend doesn't ever let her finish a sentence, Julie's friend takes her to a professional necromancer. Apparently, the simply place ads in the paper and hold office in a messy garage box! The brunette succubus shape-shifts into Julie's luscious body to attack her assailants, but obviously she doesn't do it to help Julie but to grow more powerful herself.

"Necromancer" is a typical product of the 80s! Half of the dialogues and situations would downright infuriate nowadays audiences. It was the time when rapists were still convinced their victims secretly enjoyed rough assaults, when pervert teachers threatened to give bad grades if the female student didn't allow them to grab their intimate parts, and when nerds with skateboards and odd haircuts snuck into people's houses to "investigate" supernatural stuff. In short, "Necromancer" is a must in case you enjoy gratuitous toplessness, cheesy demonic claws and teeth, and mushy 80s synthesizer pop-songs! Oh, and also if you want to see what the world's ugliest bathroom looks like!

I have read the other reviews and I just did not think this movie was as bad as many of the others are saying. No this is not a great cinematic success and yes a lot of this has been seen before. However, for this type of movie it was at least as good as many other B movies made during that same time. I do not understand how one reviewer can say that Elizabeth Kaitan in not good looking.

The story is basically about a women who gets raped at night in a collage classroom by guys she knows from school. The next day she confides what happened to a friend and instead of going to the police, they see this ad and go to this woman who turns out to be a demon. I actually think this would have been a better movie if they eliminated the demon part and just had the victim seek revenge, but then this would really be another "I spit on your grave"

Not a great movie but I think it is certainly worth a look.