IMDb RATING
4.8/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
A British art expert travels across America in order to purchase a rare Renoir painting in the South but comes across some crazy characters in the process.A British art expert travels across America in order to purchase a rare Renoir painting in the South but comes across some crazy characters in the process.A British art expert travels across America in order to purchase a rare Renoir painting in the South but comes across some crazy characters in the process.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Daniel Day-Lewis
- Henderson Dores
- (as Daniel Day Lewis)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.81K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Great cast, bad script, worth watching for the in-jokes
The cast includes Daniel Day Lewis and Joan Cusack, who one thinks could turn out stunning performances with the worst scripts. This isn't the case.
The main reason I actually wanted to watch this movie twice is because of the in-jokes that only Southerners, and Atlantans especially, would get.
In one scene at an Atlanta hotel, the Marriott Marquis was transformed into a parody of another major hotel which once had a "lake" in its lobby, and a long-standing restaurant with an overworked Civil War theme.
I highly recommend seeing this movie at least once if you lived in Atlanta in the 80's. It's also good, I would think, if you've had experience with stubborn patriarchs and traveling art buyers, but that's probably a smaller group.
The main reason I actually wanted to watch this movie twice is because of the in-jokes that only Southerners, and Atlantans especially, would get.
In one scene at an Atlanta hotel, the Marriott Marquis was transformed into a parody of another major hotel which once had a "lake" in its lobby, and a long-standing restaurant with an overworked Civil War theme.
I highly recommend seeing this movie at least once if you lived in Atlanta in the 80's. It's also good, I would think, if you've had experience with stubborn patriarchs and traveling art buyers, but that's probably a smaller group.
comic misfire has its moments
It may be a far cry from classic screwball comedy, but even during its many forgettable moments this fish-out-of-water farce isn't a total write-off. Certainly there's nothing in it to justify the cold-blooded lack of confidence that killed it at the Box Office: the throwaway release it received is usually reserved for lame dogs someone wants put out of misery, and in this case it worked.
At least the film never pretends to be anything more than what it is: a self-consciously wacky social comedy with an outsider's exaggerated, broad-as-a-barn-door view of American manners, starring Daniel Day Lewis as a dapper English art appraiser who runs into an oddball collection of cartoon Confederate rebels while investigating a lost Renoir in backwoods Georgia. All the film needs is a laugh-track to become a respectable TV sitcom (a degenerate Beverly Hillbillies?), but director Pat O'Connor doesn't show much aptitude for low comedy, and the laughs collapse into a feeble slapstick conclusion, leaving the door wide open for a sequel which will never be made.
At least the film never pretends to be anything more than what it is: a self-consciously wacky social comedy with an outsider's exaggerated, broad-as-a-barn-door view of American manners, starring Daniel Day Lewis as a dapper English art appraiser who runs into an oddball collection of cartoon Confederate rebels while investigating a lost Renoir in backwoods Georgia. All the film needs is a laugh-track to become a respectable TV sitcom (a degenerate Beverly Hillbillies?), but director Pat O'Connor doesn't show much aptitude for low comedy, and the laughs collapse into a feeble slapstick conclusion, leaving the door wide open for a sequel which will never be made.
Very uneven, but not without some good points
A very strange fish-out-of-water comedy with straight-laced stiff-upper-lip British art dealer Daniel Day-Lewis sent down South to try to purchase a priceless painting from kooky patriarch Harry Dean Stanton and contending with the various family lunatics. The tone of the film is quite uneven and the comedic moments are more mildly amusing rather than laugh-out-loud funny. Other films and books have done both the "normal guy out of his depth" and lampoon of the Southern Gothic family more expertly, but that is not to indicate that the film does not have some memorable moments. Some of the supporting performances are well done, particularly Maury Chaykin's obnoxious Elvis-garbed bully son and Martha Plimpton, as the sex-crazed teenager, who accompanies Day-Lewis on his trip. Unfortunately, others like Joan Cusack, Glenne Headley, Will Patton and Laurie Metcalf are either stuck with overly broad roles or limited screen time. Pat O'Connor's direction is rather clumsy and rough resulting in a film that moves in starts and stops, and misses the mark more often than not. Arguably the most interesting reason to see the film is Day-Lewis himself. Usually he plays straight dramatic roles filled with sweaty angst, it is rare to see him in a comedy, much less playing such a well-intentioned, discombobulated dweeb. He is surprisingly appealing and throws himself body and soul into the part, even when the film does not remotely deserve such consideration. It is a shame that he has refrained from doing much comedy, because he does show some skill in frantic slapstick moments - whether running around a hotel trying to prevent the meeting of two women or escaping from gangsters buck naked after being forced to strip. Not to digress, but Day-Lewis' surprising full frontal nude scene during the strip and escape is certainly another plus for any fans of his as, much like comedy, nudity is something he rarely does in his dramas.
Weak, with some enjoyable moments
"Stars and Bars" is not that bad, but it's not that good to warrant many words of praise. Without a doubt it's the weakest film on Daniel Day-Lewis
resume, yet it's not his fault since he delivers a nice comedic performance. The story, as written by novelist William Boyd and directed by Pat O'Connor, is all
over the place with its criticism on cultural clashes between Americans and British, with a series of unfunny moments, stereotypes and cliches. A couple
of scenes work, the acting is quite good but the final result is awkward. It might be one of those cases that work best on a book, but doesn't translate well
as a movie.
The premise is somewhat interesting and with a large ensamble cast we are easily seduced by everything, at first. Day-Lewis plays Henderson Dores, a shy and polite British art expert who is commissioned to purchase a rare Renoir painting that was somehow acquired by a hillbilly American family living down south.
The patriarch Loomis (Harry Dean Stanton) doesn't have a clue about the real worth of such lovely painting and accepts the other man's offer. The problem arises when other members of the family begin to interfere with the selling, ruining the foreign man's peace of mind, and a few women he's connected are also part of the confusion like his boss wife (Laurie Metcalf), her teenage daughter (Martha Plimpton) who invited herself to the trip as she's obsessed with him; and a potential girlfriend (Joan Cusack).
What's to like about "Stars and Bars"? The bond between Henderson and Loomis, the only meaningful interaction between characters despite the Brit sort of fooling the other guy. But it's a great connection as they share common values about what's important in life. The dinner scene with family and friends gathered is amazingly hilarious with many action going on but we're mostly focused on Spalding Gray making some on the teenage girl, and she surprises him in a painful manner. And the bookened scenes with Keith David as Henderson's fencing instructor.
As for the rest...it's simply a series of repetitive acts against the leading man, over-the-top anti-British scenarios that go nowhere, and some odd twists related with the family members - the blind woman who sees everything, the brother that never leaves the room to later appear on a key moment, etc. The generalization bias on both cultures were simply annoying and thrown in a dumb manner.
As said earlier, Daniel Day-Lewis was good in it, but not great. It's unlike anything we're used to see him doing, since he's mostly an amazing dramatic performer, and here he tries for many good humored moments and a very physical comedy. Had the filmmakers waited a little longer to make this film, the perfect choice for the role would be Hugh Grant, especially in the 1990's.
Anyway, they tried too hard to get some laughs from us, and I tried too hard to like it. Simply couldn't. 5/10.
The premise is somewhat interesting and with a large ensamble cast we are easily seduced by everything, at first. Day-Lewis plays Henderson Dores, a shy and polite British art expert who is commissioned to purchase a rare Renoir painting that was somehow acquired by a hillbilly American family living down south.
The patriarch Loomis (Harry Dean Stanton) doesn't have a clue about the real worth of such lovely painting and accepts the other man's offer. The problem arises when other members of the family begin to interfere with the selling, ruining the foreign man's peace of mind, and a few women he's connected are also part of the confusion like his boss wife (Laurie Metcalf), her teenage daughter (Martha Plimpton) who invited herself to the trip as she's obsessed with him; and a potential girlfriend (Joan Cusack).
What's to like about "Stars and Bars"? The bond between Henderson and Loomis, the only meaningful interaction between characters despite the Brit sort of fooling the other guy. But it's a great connection as they share common values about what's important in life. The dinner scene with family and friends gathered is amazingly hilarious with many action going on but we're mostly focused on Spalding Gray making some on the teenage girl, and she surprises him in a painful manner. And the bookened scenes with Keith David as Henderson's fencing instructor.
As for the rest...it's simply a series of repetitive acts against the leading man, over-the-top anti-British scenarios that go nowhere, and some odd twists related with the family members - the blind woman who sees everything, the brother that never leaves the room to later appear on a key moment, etc. The generalization bias on both cultures were simply annoying and thrown in a dumb manner.
As said earlier, Daniel Day-Lewis was good in it, but not great. It's unlike anything we're used to see him doing, since he's mostly an amazing dramatic performer, and here he tries for many good humored moments and a very physical comedy. Had the filmmakers waited a little longer to make this film, the perfect choice for the role would be Hugh Grant, especially in the 1990's.
Anyway, they tried too hard to get some laughs from us, and I tried too hard to like it. Simply couldn't. 5/10.
Depending on your expectations, you'll either hate it or love it.
This is one of those rare films that seems to divide into only two
groups:
You will only be able to love or hate this movie. However, I think the
previous reviews leave out an essential element to determining which camp
you fall into: whether you are interested in the actors (based on
previous
roles) or the film.
The best way to give you some idea of what to expect is the usual vehicle: comparison with other films. If you loved Martin Scorcese's film, After Hours or enjoyed Something Wild (with Melanie Griffith and Jeff Daniels) or were even guiltily amused by Who's That Girl (Madonna and Griffin Dunne), then you will probably like this movie. Stars and Bars uses a similar formula of "straight laced, uptight man" being taken for a wild adventure by "free-spirited, sexy woman".
Obviously, this would put someone like Daniel Day-Lewis into the right role (a tightly wound serious man), but in a very different universe from films like "My Left Foot" and "The Age of Innocence". If you are hoping for another period piece or serious art, this film is not for you. Luckily, I happen to like films that range from Wim Wenders to the latest Adam Sandler vehicle. :)
The best way to give you some idea of what to expect is the usual vehicle: comparison with other films. If you loved Martin Scorcese's film, After Hours or enjoyed Something Wild (with Melanie Griffith and Jeff Daniels) or were even guiltily amused by Who's That Girl (Madonna and Griffin Dunne), then you will probably like this movie. Stars and Bars uses a similar formula of "straight laced, uptight man" being taken for a wild adventure by "free-spirited, sexy woman".
Obviously, this would put someone like Daniel Day-Lewis into the right role (a tightly wound serious man), but in a very different universe from films like "My Left Foot" and "The Age of Innocence". If you are hoping for another period piece or serious art, this film is not for you. Luckily, I happen to like films that range from Wim Wenders to the latest Adam Sandler vehicle. :)
Did you know
- TriviaA rejected score was composed by Elmer Bernstein.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Nostalgia Critic: Should We Stop Method Acting? (2020)
- How long is Stars and Bars?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $7,500,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content








