Silent Night, Deadly Night 3: Better Watch Out!

My review was written in September 1989 after watching the film on TWE video cassette.

Direct-to-video sequel to the notorious "Santa Claus" horror series is a competently made but strictly standard fright pic bound to disappoint fans of helmer Monte Hellman.

Widely respected by cineastes, especially in Europe, Hellman has been out of the limelight of late, not getting top drawer assignments as he did back when "Two-Lane Balcktop" became a cult classic. He began his career three decades ago working on horror pics for Roger Coran (a film clip from Corman's "The Terror" is excerpted here as an homage) and now returns full circle.

Film tastefully avoids the objectionable material of its predecessors: there is just a brief setup clip from Part One. Heroine Samantha Scully is a blind girl linked up with the youngster (now grown-up Bill Moseley) responsible for the Santa Claus killings by scientist Richard Beymer. He experimented on Moseley, who's been in a coma for six years since being apprehended and nearly killed; sci-fi element here is mixed with psychic connection phenomena.

Despite this adventurous premise, pic quickly becomes a standard suspenser, as Moseley escapes ade on the rampage, threatening Scully, her brother (Eric Dea Re) and bro's pretty girlfriend (Laura Herring). Climax is out of "Wait Until Dark", with Scully evening up the ods in a darkened basement.

Interesting casting has Scully and Herring the same physical type (both earthy brunettes), and they team up in the final reels to combat the monster. Unfortunately, pic offers little novelty or thematic interest, analogous in underachievement within Hellman's output to Alan J. Pakula's similarly woebegone "Dream Lover".

Tech credits are good, with an eerie droning score by Steven Soles. Carlos Laszlo's script is filled with red herring suspense sequences and dumb dialog.

I enjoyed the original Silent Night, Deadly Night. To the dismay of other internet film critics, i also enjoyed Silent Night, Deadly Night part 2. But when i sat down to watch the 3rd installment in the series, even at the age of 15 i knew the end was near.

My Biggest issue with this film has little to do with the low rent acting. It is the blatant disregard for the previous film that irritates me the most.

Ricky has no need for the science fictional fishbowl on his head in this film, other than to draw attention away from the lack of plot, and place all eyes on a sad gimmick. In the end of Silent Night, Deadly Night 2, Ricky is shot three times, yes – But he was never shot in the head – nor did he have his head blown off as another commentator included in his/her IMDb review of the film. There is No Need for the Fishbowl!

There is a strange connection between some of the actors/actresses in this film; director David Lynch. How did such a typical slasher/B-movie happen to have 3 individuals who all went to work with the intriguing director David Lynch, on various projects. Eric DaRe from SNDN 3 portrayed shady brute "Leo Johnson" in Lynch's TV series "Twin Peaks". Richard Beymer also ended up in the strange town of "Twin Peaks", having played rich and devious "Benjamin Horne". And then certainly, the lovely and mysterious Laura Harring makes her appearance in David Lynch's "Mulholland Drive". Perhaps some of the supernatural entities that exist in Lynch's various works, seeped into the world of reality, and pulled these three actors/actresses into the world of David Lynch at an unforeseen future point in their careers... or, maybe David Lynch is just a really big fan of "Silent Night, Deadly Night 3". You be the judge.

Having been shot and severely wounded in the previous film, the psychotic killer named "Ricky" (Bill Moseley) lies in a comatose state and is being used for scientific research by a man by the name of "Dr. Newbury" (Richard Beymar). To that effect, his main interest consists of using a young woman named "Laura" (Samantha Scully) to attempt to make contact with him using her unique talent in the field of extra sensory perception. Unfortunately, although she does in fact make contact with Ricky, it isn't the positive breakthrough that Dr. Newbury had hoped for as Laura continues to experience nightmares each time she interacts with him. Likewise, Ricky is also affected--and this soon creates problems for all concerned. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this is one of those horror movies which lacked the suspense necessary for a film of this sort. Admittedly, it was slightly better than its immediate predecessor but, even so, that isn't saying much as that particular film was, for the most part, quite dreadful. Be that as it may, I wasn't too impressed with this film either and I have rated it accordingly. Below average.

These sequels of the Silent Night, Deadly Night have so far been subpar and not on the level of the original. After a very disappointing second film, had slightly higher expectations for this third film but seeing as it went straight to video, had realistic expectations.

Although this film may be better than the second, it still isn't good and has a lot of things going wrong for it.

It feels extremely dull, slow moving, lacks suspense and any real thrills or horror elements. Doesn't feel much like a Christmas horror film either and nothing like the original.

The tone and overall atmosphere right from the start of the film sets everything off as it has a dry feel.

The acting by the lead female and her character is decent enough as she doesn't quite overact where she's a better lead than the character Ricky in part 2. Still, no real suspense, and no clever gory kills.

The villain in this film wasn't menacing as they made him out to be. And what makes it worse is how they weren't able to kill him. He supported a sort of fishbowl dispenser on his head and wasn't very mobile. How the brother let him attack him was silly.