Working their fingers to the bone to prepare the set for an upcoming performance, the enthusiastic stagehands, Roscoe and Buster, find themselves on stage when the cast quits. However, is wi... Read allWorking their fingers to the bone to prepare the set for an upcoming performance, the enthusiastic stagehands, Roscoe and Buster, find themselves on stage when the cast quits. However, is will alone enough to earn a big round of applause?Working their fingers to the bone to prepare the set for an upcoming performance, the enthusiastic stagehands, Roscoe and Buster, find themselves on stage when the cast quits. However, is will alone enough to earn a big round of applause?
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Like Keaton's later short, "The Play-House" (1921), this two-reel comedy gives viewers a distinct feel for the era of vaudeville--though from the perspective of the stagehands rather than the audience. It includes many fine gags built around various back-stage activities and the bumbling attempts of two stagehands, Arbuckle and Keaton, to act as performers.
The most interesting gag historically involves a scenery flat falling toward Arbuckle, with an upstairs window passing around him. Keaton later used an actual falling house front in the same manner twice in his own films: the 1920 short "One Week" (his first release as a solo artist) and, more dramatically, in the 1928 feature "Steamboat Bill Jr.," which was his last independent release (it does not appear in "Sherlock Jr." as stated elsewhere). The latter instance was an extremely dangerous stunt, which easily would have killed Keaton if he did not hit his mark precisely.
"Back Stage" is not their best film together, but it remains a very good Arbuckle-Keaton effort well worth viewing.
** 1/2 (out of 4)
Later day two-reeler has Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle and Buster Keaton playing stage hands who run off The Strong Man after insulting him. When everyone walks out the duo must go on stage and try to make the paying crowd happy.
BACK STAGE isn't the greatest collaboration between Arbuckle and Keaton but if you're a fan of the two legends then this here is certainly worth watching, although you can't help but wish it was better. The biggest problem is that the story itself just doesn't give our two leads much to do. The first portion of the film contains a few laughs and especially the scenes with Arbuckle and the kid that is annoying him. The second portion has Keaton in drag but this here just never gets a big laugh. Again, if you're a fan this is worth watching but the duo certainly made a lot better.
The setting, with Fatty and Buster working "Back Stage" for a vaudeville show, lends itself well to humor and variety, and this setting is quite interesting in its own right. If you watch closely, you'll also notice a number of gags used here that Keaton later refined and used to even greater effect later in some of his own short features.
There are several good sequences, and they provide a good showcase for both Arbuckle and Keaton to display their considerable array of comic talents. Al St. John and the rest of the supporting cast also get a couple of good moments. It's great comedy, and a lot of fun to watch.
Did you know
- TriviaIncluded in "Buster Keaton: The Shorts Collection" blu-ray set, released by Kino.
- Quotes
Strongman's Assistant: [the act quits, to Buster and Fatty] We don't need them. Let's do the show ourselves!
- ConnectionsFeatured in Birth of Hollywood: Episode #1.2 (2011)
Details
- Runtime
- 26m
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1