Suds

While it's more uneven than usual for a Mary Pickford feature, "Suds" is generally enjoyable, with a mix of material that works often enough to make it worthwhile. Pickford's character was something of a change-of-pace for her, in that many of the character's problems here are simply her own fault, not the result of circumstance. There is also more silly humor than you expect from Mary, but then there are some better comedy sequences that she pulls off as well as ever.

The story has Pickford as Amanda, a day-dreamer working in a hand laundry, where the other employees see her as a ridiculous romantic at best, and an inept nuisance at worst. The plot is carried in part by her far-fetched fantasies, and in part by her efforts to help out the old horse who pulls the laundry's delivery cart. Most of the scenes hold up well enough on their own, but as a whole it never really seems to get off the ground. Fortunately, Mary could make even the most negligible material seem watchable, so most of it works all right, and there are a couple of very good sequences. With a lesser star, it probably would have fallen apart, and overall it probably gets about as much as it could have from the material.

Okay, so I've checking message boards and after seeing pretty much all of the Mary Pickford films one can get on video-which is just a small percentage-I have to say Suds is one of my favorites. It's really goofy, and yeah, a little uneven, but in a way that's it's charm. It has some real goofy charm, I like that Pickford plays a total screw-up. Most of her intentions are good, but she's also a liar, she's a very dynamic person. Often I get bored of Mary Pickford films because she would get stuck playing one-note characters. Amanda is an interesting character because she's such a dork. It's a little sad because seeing odd but charming choices she makes as Amanda, such as the scene where she can't stop scratching the itch on her arm, or the scene where she stitches a portrait of guy she likes into his own shirt show that while she got more opportunities than most women of her time if things had been different she may have been female Charline and not a footnote in cinema history-a title she doesn't deserve anyway. it's a good film.

Not wanting to be pigeon holed in little girls' roles, Mary Pickford immediately took on the part of a laundress working in a dingy laundry in the January 1920 film "Suds." She's constantly picked on by co-workers because of her fantasies associating with handsome men and members of the upper class. Pickford makes her character, Amanda, look as plain as possible by wearing worn out clothes and hunching her shoulders. Saving an old white work horse from the glue factory by taking it to her apartment opens doors of opportunities for Amanda in potentially realizing her dreams.

The studio was criticized for using the play's original ending and immediately filmed and tacked on an upbeat conclusion that still leaves today's viewers a bit confused.

"Suds," based on the 1904 English play 'Op o' Me Thumb," was revamped into a musical opera in the late 1990's using 1960's songs such as 'Please Mr. Postman' and 'Chapel of Love.'

A not-entirely-successful, offbeat, change-of-pace for America's alleged Sweetheart, Mary Pickford. Playing a Cockney laundress in an excellently re-created London, she is at her best with the comedy: falling in and out of laundry bins, hiding under baskets, keeping a horse in her apartment, etc. As for the pathos, our heroine is less sympathetic here than usual, mainly because most of the character's problems are brought on by herself and her own unhealthy fantasy life (some of which is depicted in a lengthy, but wonderfully loopy, imaginary flashback). There is no real villain to overcome but herself -- and she fails to manage a victory. The ending (or endings -- three different final scenes were filmed) is abrupt and not terribly convincing. The supporting cast, though competent, is unmemorable -- except, perhaps, for Lavender, the horse, who gets a couple of good bits, including a final sight gag in one of the endings: pulling a chair, and the movie, out from under poor Mary.

Amanda Afflick (Mary Pickford) is a laundry worker in London early in the 20th century. She is small and weak and the other girls at the laundry pick on her, but she has one consolation: she adores a male customer who left his shirt eight months ago. In front of her colleagues she pretends he is her lover and she is the disowned daughter of an 'arch-dook'. A sub-plot tells how she saves the ancient horse that pulls the laundry cart from being sent off to the knacker's yard. If there is any single film that demonstrates what a great actress Pickford was it is not one of the pictures where she plays a little girl; it is this one. Without any camera tricks and with minimal makeup she manages to appear as an entirely different person - small, wizened, with hunched shoulders and pinched face, whose underlying beauty becomes apparent only at second sight. 'Suds' tells a story that is not particularly happy but it is still full of humour and even of slapstick-like fun (the film exists with several endings, I saw the version where Amanda and her true admirer are reunited with the horse in the countryside). In the course of her career, Pickford would make more sophisticated pictures, for my taste reaching her high point in 1927 with 'My Best Girl'. However, 'Suds' is incomparably better than the earlier efforts of her that I have watched and it showcases her talents perfectly. Highly recommended!