Ann Carver's Profession

... but wait, there's more! Law school graduate Ann Carver (Fay Wray) marries architecture graduate and college football hero Bill Graham (Gene Raymond). Being the Depression, Bill can only get a job as a draftsman. His wife stays home as was the custom in those days, even if the couple had no kids. At a dinner party, Ann gets involved in a discussion of how to win a case, and winds up with a job offer. She climbs in her profession and loves it, Bill languishes in his, and hates it.

The Grahams get posher digs, they have servants, all on Ann's money. When Bill can't pay the household servants when Ann is away on business, he quits his drafting job and gets a job singing at a club, using his football celebrity as collateral because it means much more money. Unfortunately the other singer who got him this job is played by Claire Dodd. It's always a bad omen to pal around with Claire Dodd in a precode. The Graham marriage breaks apart, and Bill takes to drinking heavily, sometimes with and sometimes without Dodd, whose advances he rebuffs.

Then Dodd's character dies and Bill gets accused of her murder. And in a preposterous development Ann defends him at trial by claiming - truly - that nobody can find a motive for Bill murdering the woman, and -ridiculously - besides it was all her (Ann's) fault because she wanted a career. How dare her! How will this turn out, watch and find out.

What makes this very paint by numbers plot rise a star above mediocre is the twist of how Claire Dodd's character actually dies. Nobody ever figures it out, except the audience, who witnesses the entire thing. The 1930's equivalent of Quincy does not come along and solve the riddle. And I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like it.

Also, there is a very precode courtroom scene, where Ann makes her name. She is defending a breech of promise suit - that is where a man promises to marry a woman and then backs out. In the 30s this could mean big bucks for the woman if the man was rich, and in this case he is. The reason he backed out was that he found out the woman was black. She claimed that he always knew she was black, and that it should have been obvious when they went swimming that she was. That she never hid her race or lied to him. The opposing counsel says that anybody should be able to tell a black woman from a white one. So Ann brings in six women - three white, three black, but all of the same skin color - and demands that the opposing counsel say who is who. The judge breaks up this circus but the point is made and the woman suing the rich man loses. Now this all sounds very racist because it is, but it was cut out of versions of this film shown in the production code era that started the following year because - wait for it - the film is making it look like race is only skin deep AND that a white man could be married to a black woman and never even know it. Oh the horror!

Sometimes even very formulaic old films are worth seeking out for the twenty minutes or so that they are NOT formulaic.

Ann Carver's Profession (1933)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Entertaining curio from Columbia has Fay Wray playing a wife turned brilliant lawyer who must defend her estranged husband (Gene Raymond) when he is accused of killing a nightclub singer (Claire Dodd). This is an extremely interesting little gem that manages to be entertaining as a film but also because of the way it showed women and race of the time. The husband ends up leaving the wife because she's making more money than him, which is something he's embarrassed about. Seeing a woman work here way up without using sexuality is something else not all that common from films of this era. The way the film views race is another interesting thing because Wray's first big trial is a black woman charged with dating a white man but not telling him she was black. This entire courtroom scene is rather jaw dropping as even blackface doesn't seen as out of date as this sequence. We see the attorney bring in "questionable" black women who might be white. The entire sequence is surreal, strange and certainly something you probably won't see in too many movies. The biggest problem with the film comes in the final ten minutes when the trial of the husband actually starts. The actual ending is a downright disaster but even worse is how we get to that ending with a certain speech inside the court. It was so bad I actually wanted to hit the mute button. Wray turns in a decent performance, although I think she goes a tad bit over the top during some of the court scenes. Raymond, Dodd and the rest of the supporting cast do fine work and the director keeps everything moving at a nice pace. This is yet another forgotten film that popped up on Turner Classic Movies and it's one more should check out as it gives us a rather interesting insight to some rather strange topics.

Lest We Forget, Before Women were Propelled into the Workforce by Necessity During World War II, the Professional Female was a Somewhat Controversial Anomaly. Hollywood did use the Situation Frequently During the 1930's as the Depression Made Things More Gender Equal as the Economic Suffering Dispersed Like a Plague Among the Populace.

In this One Fay Wray is a College Graduate Along with Her Football Star Husband (Gene Raymond) and His Career as an Architect is Stalling and She Decides to Pursue Her Own Status as a Lawyer. She Abandons Her Wifely Duties as Her Amiable Husband Becomes More and More Frustrated.

It is an Interesting Bit of Antiquity and has Some Things of Interest Including a Bizarre Courtroom Scene at the Beginning that Concerns Itself with Society's Segregation. It Shows its Pre-Code Pedigree as Hubby has an Affair and Shacks Up with Claire Dodd and the Sex and Drinking are On Display Quite Freely.

The Ending will Certainly Disappoint Women Libbers as it Resorts to a Standard Conservative Courtroom Speech About a Woman's Place. Fay Wray is Given an Opportunity to Show Some Acting Chops in the Same Year She would be Immortalized in One of the Best Films Ever Made. One She would Forever be Associated. Later in Life She Stated..."I have now realized that King Kong was my friend."

Fay Wray made this the same year as she did King Kong. In this one, she stars as Ann Carver, a working girl who becomes a successful attorney - pretty far ahead of her time! She marries Bill (Gene Raymond) an architect who has big plans, but isn't as successful as he'd like to be. They run into legal trouble, and its up to Ann to try to get them out of it. A lot of clever lines and fun scenes, well done by the cast. Raymond and Wray make a very believable couple, and the script flows with no pot holes or plot-holes. Claire Dodd is in the cast, and one of my favorites, Jessie Ralph, as Terry, the over-dramatic housekeeper. This was made just prior to the film code enforcement, as we can tell by the courtroom scenes, and the backless dresses on F. Wray. "Ann Carver" has a lot in common with "The Bride Walks Out", kind of a remake by RKO in 1936, which also starred G Raymond, but this time with B. Stanwycke. Written by Robert Riskin, who won the Oscar for writing "It Happened One Night". Directed by Edward Buzzell, who directed a couple of the Marx Brothers films. Good, fun entertainment, even if the ending is a little weak.

This is the story of someone who has the unnatural, ungodly affliction of being ambitious and wanting a career even though she's not a man! Will she see the error of her ways before she causes the destruction of civilisation?

Although we know attitudes were very different in the 30s, it's still astonishing and thoroughly shocking to see this in the flesh. If you watch a lot of 1930s pictures you start to think that these people are just like you and that times weren't so different. You've grown to regard these little black + white celluloid people as your friends and you feel really let down by them. What's shocking is that it suddenly clicks with you that to these people you thought you knew, all this seemed absolutely normal. Even the bizarre opening court case when a girl is caught pretending to be white, breaking the miscegenation laws was a perfectly aspect of normal life to the society your celluloid friends lived in. It disappoints you. What is particularly saddening is that this is written by Robert Riskin - the champion of the underdog, Columbia's and Frank Capra's star writer, defender of the little man. It could logically be argued that it wasn't him, it was the society he lived in but it's still like finding out that Paddington is a Nazi.

Like WEEKEND MARRIAGE made a year earlier, its theme is identical: a woman's place is in the home and like that film, it's also pretty terribly made. That this was not only made by a top director, Eddie Buzzell but also written by one of the best screenwriters of Hollywood makes no sense for it to be so poor. The cinematography and the overall look of the film is actually quite impressive but the acting is flat and you simply can't engage with them - you have no desire whatsoever to get to know these people. Maybe it's the theme which instantly makes you uneasy so unreceptive to this. Maybe it's because it's so badly acted particularly by Gene Raymond and Claire Dodd. Actually, as second-rate an actress Fay Wray was, she's not too bad in this. She doesn't get good reviews for her performance but compared with her colleagues, she's Meryl Streep. How can she do better with such a self-deprecating role castigating herself for wanting a career, wanting excitement instead of just staying at home to look after her husband and give him a child - sorry, a son?

This is worse than WEEKEND MARRIAGE because at least that was so insanely over the top misogynistic it engaged your emotions even if only to make you furious. With this, despite it looking better and having so much going on every minute, it somehow manages to be boring at the same time.