Magnificent Obsession

I have seen both this original version and the Douglas Sirk remake from the 1950s. The two are extremely similar...so similar you might want to only see one of them. While the remake is naturally lacking in originality, it is a bit glossier and prettier due to the Technicolor as well as Sirk's style...he had a real deft hand with romances.

The story begins with the death of a famous and beloved doctor. It seems when the doctor needed life-saving equipment, it was being used on a drunk playboy who has pretty much led a selfish and worthless life. He feels bad about this, at least as much as he can at this point. But later when his actions ALSO cause the widow to become blinded, he suffers a huge crisis and dedicates his life to helping her and others.

Robert Taylor and Irene Dunne are very good here. But I didn't rate fhe film higher simply because while enjoyable, the film certainly seemed far-fetched and a bit schmaltzy. Still, it is worth seeing.

I'm SOOOOOO Glad that the 1935 version of Magnificent Obsession is being released along with the 1954 version..The newer version is getting all the hype,etc. but it truly is the 1935 version with Irene Dunne/Robert Taylor which is the understated and much better rendering. I have a poor video quality version,but better than nothing..hope the released version has been improved in restoration.John Stahl's solid directing makes the principal characters more realistic.Robert Taylor shows a palpable presence in his first main screen venture..and of course amongst Irene Dunne's early 1930 films,this simply is one of her very best!1935..classy...1954...somewhat sappy

Two movies 20 years apart based on the same book about a woman who's blinded in a car accident proved pivotal to a pair of future well-known actors. The earliest film involved young Robert Taylor, whose screen presence exponentially increased after his performance in December 1935's "Magnificent Obsession." Adapted from Lloyd Douglas' 1929 weepy novel, Taylor played a spoiled brat who was in love with the stricken woman, but suddenly gains maturity by motivating himself to become a brain surgeon.

Taylor was in his second year in Hollywood, and saw some success in his earlier appearance in "Broadway Melody of 1936." Casting the character of the son from a wealthy family whose love for the bottle was more important than treating people decently was crucial for the John Stahl-directed movie. After several choices were considered to play opposite actress Irene Dunn, Taylor was selected, with positive results.

"Magnificent Obsession" bounces from one tragedy to the next, but contains shining examples of sacrificing oneself for the greater good of human kind. Taylor plays the wisecracking Robert Merrick, whose drunken accident nearly kills him, only to be saved by the local hospital's only ventilator. Trouble is, at the same time Robert was hogging the sole ventilator, the highly esteemed generous philanthropist Dr. Hudson dies because of the same hospital's lack of another ventilator. Dr. Hudson's younger wife, Helen (Dunne), loathes the young man whom she feels is responsible for her husband's death. Robert meets and falls for the widow (in real life Irene was 35 to Taylor's 24). Driving her home, he becomes aggressive in his passion. Helen escapes his clutches by jumping out of the parked car, only to be struck by a passing automobile. "When his character makes the transition from self-absorbed playboy to dedicated doctor and committed philanthropist," describes film reviewer Sean Axmaker, "you can see the guilt and regret in his face and the seriousness in his new demeanor."

The author of 'Magnificent Obsession,' Lloyd Douglas, a former church minister who is also known for his 1942 novel 'The Robe,' adopted the Bible's Gospel of Matthew passage "That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly" as a basis for both Dr. Hudson's generosity and Robert Merrick's remarkable turnaround as a Nobel Prize-winning brain surgeon. Merrick's focus on dedicating his life to cure the blind Helen sets up a tearjerker conclusion.

Taylor saw his fortunes in Hollywood increase after "Magnificent Obsession," a film where the actor was a loan-out to Universal Pictures. He began receiving substantial roles from his employer, MGM, after the studio realized what a gem it had in its stable. Ironically, the 1954 remake of the same book also boasted the career of another young actor who had been bouncing around in low budget adventure movies. Rock Hudson was selected for the Merrick role in director Douglas Sirk's "Magnificent Obsession." The film became a huge hit for Universal, catapulting Hudson into the limelight as Hollywood's new romantic star.

Rich playboy Robert Taylor is indirectly and innocently responsible for the death of Irene Dunne's philanthropic doctor husband, then falls in love with her. He anonymously replaces her vanished fortune. Then she falls blind and he does everything he can and more to help her recover her sight.

It took fourteen writers, director John Stahl, and the usual vast array of actors and technicians to make this piffle hang together, confirm Miss Dunne as an A-list star, and show MGM, Taylor's home studio, that he could stand up to the strain. It was another hit for Stahl in his annual weepie fest for Universal in the 1930s You can see the snipped-off plots from Lloyd Douglas's novel. How did Charles Butterworth wind up married to Betty Furness (gives a decent performance, by the way). What is Sara Haden doing there? Did they try to get Otto Kruger for the Ralph Morgan role?

These and other questions linger in the background of my mind, even as I consider the question of euthanasia. I can admire the practical results as a matter of commercial film making, even though this sort of movie annoys the heck out of me.

The Sirk excellent remake has overshadowed Stahl's version nowadays.That's certainly unfair,because the latter was a pioneer of the melodrama who would peak with "leave her to heaven" ,ten years later.Stahl 's version,in stark black and white is certainly not as palatable as the 1953 movie and its gaudy technicolor.

Randolph's character seems more important in Stahl's version.His theory is certainly moving:You've only got what you give and you should not expect any award.Merrick tries to apply this theory,first because he wants to seduce the wife of the philanthropist/doctor who indirectly died because of him,because he was an alcoholic playboy.He has not really understood what Randolph tried to explain to him.The scene with the hobo comes as a comic relief,which is terribly needed in such a dark yarn.When ,as leaving the poor man,Merrick thinks he's got some divine reward,he's completely mistaken.A Christian movie,"magnificent obsession" sure is,as Randolph,in his second scene ,mentions the Christ. After all,his theory is not that much far from that of James Stewart's guardian angel in "it's a wonderful life".

Unlikelihoods are here there and everywhere,but it's the rules of melodrama.The story ,which includes death,blindness,moral and physical redemption,is not more far-fetched than westerns and thrillers plots.And life is so strange that it can turn sometimes into the most implausible melodrama;and like it or not,not necessarily with a happy end.