As You Like It

The main role, Rosalind, is well-played by the cute, vivacious Bergner. Olivier is good with the physical stuff (very graceful) and the repartee. He tends to fall flat on the soliloquies and extended reveries, though. (And he's wearing way too much makeup, including at times some very crooked lipstick.) The costumes and sets are vivid, probably meant to suggest a fairy-tale, and thus account for the ridiculous plot devices.

And despite the comments of another reviewer, the camera-work is not all "point-and-shoot." It is a bit static by today's standards, but not by those of 1936.

The biggest liability is the muddy, distant sound.

All in all, I liked it more than the average filmed Shakespeare, though it's not great by any means.

This is a decent adaptation of Shakespeare's "As You Like It", with the main reason to watch being a young Laurence Olivier as Orlando. The rest of the production is adequate, although some aspects of it are a bit routine. The story follows the play closely, except that of course a good proportion of the lines, plus occasional scenes, are deleted to bring it down to its movie length of about 90 minutes. You can definitely see its age at times, even more so than with most movies of the era, but it does have some positives too.

Very few performers come near Olivier's standard when it comes to doing Shakespeare, and even though this was one of his earliest efforts, he is still pretty good, delivering the lines well, although perhaps more brooding than necessary. The other lead, Elisabeth Bergner as Rosalind, does give her character a distinctive turn, but it does not always work as well. Still, she has plenty of energy, and that helps a lot. The production actually seems to highlight her performance more so than Olivier's. The rest of the cast is OK, but does not always have a lot to do.

The best productions of Shakespeare enable even those not familiar with the play to appreciate it, and this one probably does not do that. It will be best enjoyed by those who like the play and who also are already used to movies of the era.

Laurence Olivier in his first Shakespeare adaptation on screen. This is the first motif to see this old film , good kick to discover the root of classic performances from Shakespeare universe.

The second virtue - the noble effort of Elizabeth Bergner to create a beautiful Rosalind portrait , using her experience in polish of it on German scene. Her accent ? I saw it as good point , defining exactly the determination to propose a professional performance.

Yes, not great but profound charming, offering a seductive return to the connection between rosalind and Orlando and decent solutions for a real seductive adaptation.

In his first Shakespearian film, handsome nobleman Laurence Olivier (as Orlando) is tricked into a wrestling match by nasty brother John Laurie (as Oliver). Assumed to be the doomed underdog, Mr. Olivier surprises everyone by winning. He also catches the eye of Duke's daughter Elisabeth Bergner (as Rosalind), who is enamored with the younger man in tights. Olivier is likewise attracted to Ms. Bergner. They are banished, separately, to the animal-friendly Forest of Arden, where Bergner is disguised as a man...

This is a serviceable retelling of the Shakespearian comedy. Today, people may watch it for Olivier, but it's made for Bergner, who received "Best Actress" praise for previous performances in "The Rise of Catherine the Great" (1934, New York Times) and "Escape Me Never" (1935, Academy Awards nomination). All three pictures were directed by her husband Paul Czinner. Bergner is most appealing, but not convincing, in her scenes as the young man "Ganymede" with cousin Sophie Stewart (as Celia).

***** As You Like It (9/3/36) Paul Czinner ~ Elisabeth Bergner, Laurence Olivier, Sophie Stewart, John Laurie

Famous for being the first British film adaptation of a Shakespeare's play, the movie is focused primarily on the tour de force of Elisabeth Bergner, who, German accent aside, succedes to give the character a genuine enthusiasm and lightness. Laurence Olivier is good-looking and elegant, but not yet as captivating as in his future memorable interpretations. Probably, the real interest of the film lies in the impressive technical cast, made up of greats such as David Lean (brilliant editing), Jack Cardiff and Harold Rosson (photography) and William Walton (music). Anyway, with a good cast to watch, the film stands as a valid document of how Shakespare was performed at the time.