General Spanky

This is a cute film starring Spanky, Alfalfa and Buckwheat from the "Our Gang" comedies. Set in the South during the Civil War, it may seem a little odd to see Buckwheat as Spanky's slave, but this film is as charming as the best of the shorts with the same cast. This was the only Our Gang feature film, and I highly recommend it over The Little Rascals remake from 1994.

The Our Gang series of shorts took place in more urban settings, and there were few overtly racist moments in those shorts - all the kids were playing together, in the same spaces, going in and out of the same doors, in and out of each other's homes, and no reference made to segregation or Jim Crow, etc. There was stereotyping, for sure - the black American kids, the Italian kids, the Asian kids, the fat kids, etc. But the lack of those overt racist moments is probably why these shorts have translated well enough for modern viewing.

But this full-length feature throws all that out the window: here is a story set in the South and presenting enslaved black Americans as happy, sweet simpletons, treated wonderfully by their owners. It's not "Birth of a Nation" bad - more "Song of the South" bad. There's even a conversation 10 minutes into the movie between two slave owners, bragging at how well fed and cared for their slaves are. Buckwheat, here an enslaved child, overhears the violence these owners say they would do on a re-captured runaway slave, and as he is run-away, he is terrified. It's supposed to be a funny moment - but to any halfway caring human being, knowing what really did happen to re-captured run- away slaves, the incredible violence and humiliation that was all too real, it's painful now to watch this scene, to watch this reality made light of. It would be like watching an old movie making fun of the Holocaust. Lots of other cringe-worthy moments as well, like Spanky proudly proving he's a "Southern Gentleman" to Alfalfa by showing off "his" slave, smiling happy Buckwheat.

So, why did I give it a 7? Because it is a PERFECT example of how, 70 years after the Civil War - and beyond - the myths of the happy slave, the genteel white slave owner, the "noble" and brave fighters for the Southern "cause" and the boorish, cowardly Northerners was/is perpetuated in the USA, this time with the overwhelming cuteness and charm of Spanky and Buckwheat, probably the two most popular members of the Little Rascals (they were always my favorites).

This Hal Roach feature, General Spanky, is the one hundred fiftieth entry in the "Our Gang/Little Rasclas" series and the sixty-second talkie. It's also, as I implied in the first sentence, the only one more than two or three reels in length. It begins on a steam boat when Buckwheat is one of the slaves on board and Spanky is a shoeshine boy on it. They both end up falling in the river and-with help from a life preserver-end up on land near a Southern plantation. As Civil War gets declared, Spanky, Buckwheat, and Alfalfa form their own Army and mistakenly is mixed with a real adult one...There's more but I'll just now mention that Spanky and Buckwheat make a good team at the beginning on the boat and the plantation before Alfalfa arrives then it's mostly Spank and him on screen. Since it's Black History Month, I have to mention that many adult African-American cast members are slaves though two more, Louise Beavers and Willie Best-who during the early part of the '30s was often credited as "Sleep 'n' Eat"-play the plantation servants. There's a pretty funny scene with them involving a paint brush. The attitudes-in the movie-of the South concerning slavery is true to the period and it's that fact that makes this film a little easy to take though when Spanky forms his own military outfit, it's nice to know he allows Buckwheat to be a part of it! Also appearing is Rosina Lawrence, usually cast as the Gang's teacher, as the leading lady of the leading man, who in this case is Phillips Holmes. To tell the truth, having the Gang involved in a real-life historical setting especially one which divided the country as The War Between the States (the South's name for it) did not suit their kiddie comedy-style. When producer Hal Roach originally contracted his distributor M-G-M for an "Our Gang" feature in 1935, he wrote one for something called Crook's Incorporated which would have co-starred Charley Chase, Thelma Todd, and Patsy Kelly and sounded like a more suitable feature for those kids. Unfortunately, Ms. Todd faced a tragic end and Chase and Ms. Kelly moved to other studios...

Spanky and his friends all decide to play army as the country is embroiled in war. His friends designate him their general and he leads them on a rather funny encounter with real Union troops! In addition, they help a nice Southern officer escape a hanging--a hanging orchestrated by a total jerk.

It's not hard to believe that Hal Roach Studios decided to give little Spanky from the Our Gang comedies his own feature film. After all, for his age, he was a dandy actor...and cute as a button. However, in hindsight, their choice of material was a bit on the grotesque side. It's not that setting the story in the South during the Civil War was necessarily a bad thing, but the whole slavery issue is very weird when you see it today. After all, in this film you see lots of black slaves standing about and singing for joy, as they apparently love their lot in life!! And, when Buckwheat (who is a runaway slave) begins to cry because he wants to have a master, too, it's just too much! If it weren't so evil, it would be comical. It's sad. Because without the racial insensitivity, the film is very good. The kids in the film are all good actors and Buckwheat really is quite adorable and effective in the film.

Rather surreal...that's for sure.

I see from some of the other user comments here for "General Spanky" mention of the uncomfortable subplot of Buckwheat a slave who is in search of a master, as well as other parts of the movie glossing over the whole issue concerning slavery. So I don't think it's necessary for me to go into depth blasting the movie for those things when others have already done the job. What I will mention, however, is that the movie is pretty tough going even if you can look beyond the controversial content. I guess I should mention is that I have never gotten into the "Our Gang" shorts, finding the child stars to be poor and annoying actors. So seeing them in a full length movie for me was an excruciating experience. But what really sinks the movie is that the script is a mess. Certainly the humor is really lame, but there is almost no plot, just a bunch of vignettes that are barely connected together. And while the movie is just 71 minutes long, it moves at a snail's pace. If you are looking for a Civil War comedy involving a general, watch the Buster Keaton movie "The General" instead.