Rodolfe, Crown Prince of Austria, is fettered on all sides. He's bored; his father, the emperor, is domineering; his politics are more liberal than his father's, but he knows his views carry... Read allRodolfe, Crown Prince of Austria, is fettered on all sides. He's bored; his father, the emperor, is domineering; his politics are more liberal than his father's, but he knows his views carry no weight. He agrees to marry a princess to sire an heir, then spends his nights as a pla... Read allRodolfe, Crown Prince of Austria, is fettered on all sides. He's bored; his father, the emperor, is domineering; his politics are more liberal than his father's, but he knows his views carry no weight. He agrees to marry a princess to sire an heir, then spends his nights as a playboy. In 1888, he meets Marie Vetsera, 17, a baroness' daughter. She is resolute, smitten,... Read all
- Awards
- 3 wins & 1 nomination total
- La baronne Vetsera
- (as Marthe Regnier)
- La cousine de Marie
- (as Assia)
- Une fille
- (as Ribès)
- Szeps
- (as Bergeron)
- Le chef de la police
- (as Sokoloff)
- Le premier policier
- (as Aimos)
- Le second policier
- (as Siméon)
Featured reviews
The Mayerling affair
Opening thoughts: There were plenty of reasons for seeing 'Mayerling'. Have always loved period dramas, and especially when it is a period of history that really piques a lot of interest. Having gained a major interest in Austrian royalty since my holiday to Vienna last year (especially Empress Elisabeth, aka Sissi), this was one such period. It also intrigued seeing Charles Boyer in an early role and the kind that he became well known for and for seeing one of Anatole Litvak's early films.
'Mayerling' is a very, very good film indeed. Not perfection, but there are numerous good things and most of those good things are actually exceptional. Of the two 'Mayerling' films seen, the other being the one from the 50s, this is infinitely better with it actually being good (was underwhelmed by the other). It is very easy to see why Boyer became a major international star after this and the film is one of Litvak's best and most interesting early films (the film that also helped make his career bigger), as far as his films in general go it's not quite 'All This and Heaven Too' and especially 'The Snake Pit' but it is in the better end.
Bad things: It isn't perfect. Will agree that Gabrielle Dorziat wasn't right for Elisabeth, she came over as too old and didn't get enough of the ahead of the time astonishing beauty that Elisabeth was famous for the struggles she faced in her life.
Also thought that the lead up to the tragic conclusion was too overlong and dragged out.
Good things: However, 'Mayerling' looks absolutely ravishing, with sumptuous costume designs and art direction and the photography is some of the most beautiful of any film from the late 30s. Was not sure as to whether Arthur Honegger's music would gel stylistically and in mood, but it is suitably dramatic without being bombastic or too melodramatic and is quite lush. Litvak's direction is some of his most stylish and sensitive.
Furthermore, the script is thought provoking and doesn't go into soap opera territory too much. There may be cliches here but they are not done in too cliched a manner. The story always intrigues, even in the slower patches, and has emotional impact and very passionate romance. The conclusion itself is very moving and the love is very deeply felt.
Boyer and Danielle Darrieux are both perfectly cast, giving performances of great dignity and passion. Their chemistry smolders. The supporting cast are excellent too, with reservations had for only Dorziat.
Concluding thoughts: Overall, very, very good.
8/10.
Two Death Do They Part
In this French-language version by Ukranian director Anatole Litvak, we get a highly-romanticised version of the story with Charles Boyer and Danielle Darrieux as the star-crossed but ill-fated lovers.
The direction throughout is stylish and tasteful, Litvak impressing in his recreation of the Viennese Court with its surface splendour barely concealing the jostling for position and rumour-mongering beneath the facade. Boyer and Darrieux are excellent in their lead roles, his character the reforming, rebellious heir to the throne, unhappy in his arranged marriage and she the youthful, highly-impressionable innocent caught up in the first great passion of her life.
The concluding climax is sensitively and humanely depicted too with my only major criticisms of the film being an over-reliance on the use of the no-doubt in-vogue montage sequences and a tendency to slightly overstay the camera's welcome in certain scenes.
Nevertheless, this was a fine retelling of the notorious scandal and it's no surprise that its artistic and commercial success lured director Litvak to Hollywood where he enjoyed a distinguished career for many years.
True story
Well, it just didn't happen like that. It turned out to be a love story starring Charles Boyer and it gets very predictable from the moment we are introduced to Danielle Darrieux (Marie Vetsera). The films tells us early on exactly where this is heading with constant references to death. So, we wait to see how this is going to happen. This gets revealed right at the end - the only part of the film that holds any interest. Up until that point, it's a series of watching ballet, going to the fair, Morris dancing (the other standout moment of the film), etc whilst there are lavish sets and costumes to look at.
Once the film had finished, my wife asked if this was a true story and looked it up. Bingo! It's a true story. That makes a big difference and adds an extra point onto the score. This now holds an interest as the film describes a hugely significant moment in history. I wish I'd reminded myself of this before watching. I'll know for next time. The actual incident is a milestone as it changes the lineage of succession. Would there have been a World War 1 if the reforming, liberal Rudolf had acceded the throne? Would prostitution have become acceptably mainstream like it should be? The real story is interesting but the film not as interesting as it could have/should have been.
Enchanting !!!
Recently, I was able to obtain a copy of the this movie and saw it again after 20 years. The movie did not disappoint and I can say that it is one of the best movies ever. It must have been such a sensation when first released in 1936.
Sad But Not necessarily True
The story unfolds to the inevitable conclusion of murder/suicide which threw the Empire into turmoil. History may record the events of what happened at Mayerling a little differently but it surely makes a good story of thwarted love and royal politics. The 1968 remake with Omar Shariff and Catherine Deneuve is not bad either. This legendary romance has fascinated people since the turn of the century. So have the Kleenex handy and enjoy!!
Did you know
- TriviaOne of the first foreign films with sound to become a hit in the United States. It made an international star out of Charles Boyer.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Scissors (1991)
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $240,000
- Runtime
- 1h 36m(96 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1








