Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalHispanic Heritage MonthIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Gunga Din

  • 1939
  • Approved
  • 1h 57m
IMDb RATING
7.2/10
13K
YOUR RATING
Gunga Din (1939)
Trailer for Gunga Din
Play trailer2:12
1 Video
99+ Photos
Buddy ComedyAdventureComedyWar

In 19th century India, three British soldiers and a native waterbearer must stop a secret mass revival of the murderous Thuggee cult before it can rampage across the land.In 19th century India, three British soldiers and a native waterbearer must stop a secret mass revival of the murderous Thuggee cult before it can rampage across the land.In 19th century India, three British soldiers and a native waterbearer must stop a secret mass revival of the murderous Thuggee cult before it can rampage across the land.

  • Director
    • George Stevens
  • Writers
    • Joel Sayre
    • Fred Guiol
    • Ben Hecht
  • Stars
    • Cary Grant
    • Joan Fontaine
    • Victor McLaglen
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    7.2/10
    13K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • George Stevens
    • Writers
      • Joel Sayre
      • Fred Guiol
      • Ben Hecht
    • Stars
      • Cary Grant
      • Joan Fontaine
      • Victor McLaglen
    • 140User reviews
    • 59Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 4 wins total

    Videos1

    Gunga Din
    Trailer 2:12
    Gunga Din

    Photos136

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 129
    View Poster

    Top cast46

    Edit
    Cary Grant
    Cary Grant
    • Cutter
    Joan Fontaine
    Joan Fontaine
    • Emmy
    Victor McLaglen
    Victor McLaglen
    • MacChesney
    Douglas Fairbanks Jr.
    Douglas Fairbanks Jr.
    • Ballantine
    Sam Jaffe
    Sam Jaffe
    • Gunga Din
    Eduardo Ciannelli
    Eduardo Ciannelli
    • Guru
    Montagu Love
    Montagu Love
    • Colonel Weed
    Robert Coote
    Robert Coote
    • Higginbotham
    Abner Biberman
    Abner Biberman
    • Chota
    Lumsden Hare
    Lumsden Hare
    • Major Mitchell
    John Alban
    John Alban
      Charles Bennett
      Charles Bennett
      • Telegraph Operator
      • (uncredited)
      Gene Coogan
      Gene Coogan
      • Lancer
      • (uncredited)
      Joe De La Cruz
        Jimmy Dime
        Jimmy Dime
        • Thug
        • (uncredited)
        Ray Dixon
          George Du Count
          • Pandu Lal
          • (uncredited)
          Anna May the Elephant
          • Elephant
          • (uncredited)
          • Director
            • George Stevens
          • Writers
            • Joel Sayre
            • Fred Guiol
            • Ben Hecht
          • All cast & crew
          • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

          User reviews140

          7.213.4K
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10

          Featured reviews

          hundd44

          Politically incorrect only to the historically ignorant

          While it is fashionable in too many circles to condemn anything which portrays European colonialism generally, and the British Empire specifically, in a favorable light, a little historical knowledge will show that Kipling's story, as well as this superb film, are hardly the reactionary racist screed some would like to demote them to. Gunga Din is a regimental bhisti - a water carrier - and in 19th century India that meant that he had a job which guaranteed a place to sleep and food in a very brutal society. Considering that he was also an "untouchable" - a member of India's lowest caste - this was something. Colonel Weed is correct in saying "he had no official status as a soldier" - bhistis were non-military auxiliaries. As for his loyalty to the British, there were many Indians who clearly preferred British rule to that of their fellows - and not just the maharajas and princes.

          If you read the story - and watch the movie with an objective eye - at the end, all the major characters have nothing but respect for Gunga Din. Sergeant MacChesney (Victor McLaglen) is clearly shamed by the fact that Din, in the end, was not only the better soldier but the better man - he sacrificed himself to prevent the ambush and massacre of the British column. The most telling example that the movie doesn't "put down" Gunga Din is at the end when Colonel Weed posthumously appoints the former regimental bhisti as a Corporal in the regiment. Corporal was a BRITISH rank - the equivalent Indian rank was Havildar. So, he was appointed as a BRITISH non-commissioned officer who could command British troops - hardly an example of political incorrectness.

          Yes, this is "men-as-buddies" flick. However, this movie has a special appeal to anyone who has actually served in the military - those are the types of friendships you make (you'll share your last drop of water with your mess mate) and keep for the rest of your days. It acknowledges that. So enjoy it - it is a rousing tale - and keep the PC-nonsense out of it. The bad guys lose in the end while the best man is recognized for his virtues - you don't even get that it in real life.
          kimo-watanabe

          Wonderful Movie

          This movie was one of my favorites when I was growing up, and so when I bought the VHS tape a few months ago I was somewhat apprehensive about watching it again. I thought that maybe my memory of the film was a little sugar coated.

          I was; however, pleasantly surprised to find that I still loved watching it as much as I did when I was a kid. It's a great action adventure movie. A previous reviewer commented on the lack of sophistication the movie conveys.

          Whoever that guy is, he needs to lighten up. It's hard to look at for example the special effects and cinematography in an action adventure movie such as this when compared to the special effects and cinematography of Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. Time's have changed, and movies with them. If you keep that in mind while watching this film, and have a good time with it you'll love this movie.

          I would love to see this come out on DVD, it's a great movie.
          prudhocj

          I'm appalled at the lack of movie history (and history in general) knowledge shown by some users of this board!!

          Although I'm usually only mildly appalled reading through user comments on movies on imdb.com some of the comments made here about this classic movie exhibit a true nadir of ignorance of history in general and movies in particular. E.g.;

          1 - I'm particularly struck by the comment - "This movie is shot on location in California because shooting in India would have been too expensive." Prior to the 1950's Hollywood movies were rarely (and I mean rarely) shot on the original location sites. The problem was not expense (although the moguls certainly were pinching the pennies), the problem was transportation! Transporting a movie production company halfway around the world would have been nearly impossible to accomplish (let alone how long it would have taken and then they would have been shooting under impossible conditions in India anyway) not to mention that WWII was on the verge of breaking out! The biggest movie of that year was shot on a set in Culver City, CA where they could easily manipulate the filming. Even if they had sent the production company to Atlanta they couldn't very well burn down Atlanta for authenticity' sake now could they? They would have had to have built a set(s) in Atlanta - why would they go all the way across the country to do that when they could do it Culver City?

          2 - Several people lament that Gunga Din was not shot in color. A little movie history context here - first of all, the first full length feature film shot in color had only been done 4 years earlier, secondly three-strip technicolor was outrageously expensive in 1939 (only one other movie was shot that year in technicolor and it didn't start making back its costs until the late 1960's) and the few features shot prior to that year in color had failed miserably to make back their production costs. And finally, the studios had no faith in color (just as they had resisted "talkies" a decade earlier) - they were in business to make money, not experiment with an innovation that had not yet been accepted and proven to bring in a bigger audience. Also, there was a comment about the graininess of the B&W cinematography of GD - that's because 99% of the present day viewers are seeing multi-generation copies that have been played to death! Get a fresh, first generation copy to see the B&W shading in its true brightness, focus and clarity and that objection will go away. BTW - the colorized version of GD is abysmal - faded coloring effects and indistinct edges make it look like a sloppy water color painting!

          3 - Labelling anything from the past as not being PC only shows the lack of historical context knowledge so rampant in the present day. First of all this movie was loosely based on a poem that was already 47 years old when this movie was released. If you change the politics to match the present day conception of "correctness" then you really don't have the original concept do you? Not to mention that America was a far different place racially (and socially) in 1939. There are movies being released in 2003 that will catch hell 50 years from now for their "politics" - just chalk it up to the ignorance of future generations to not recognize what the history of the times were. I do like the analysis by one writer though that far from being a reactionary screed the movie went further than the poem in emphasizing that Gunga Din was far better off in his position than he would have been otherwise. After all, he was an "untouchable", a social postion that was abused, exploited and terrorized by their fellow Indians for thousands of years. Whatever one might think of his treatment by the British it was a high step up from what he would have endured out in his own society! Which brings me to.........

          4 - ..........the ridiculously misguided (and just plain wrong) observations about the Thuggees of India being "freedom fighters", this couldn't be more wrong. Several of the commentators really need to read up on Indian history - the Thuggees had been ritualistic murderers and thieves for thousands of years in India before the British ever arrived! If they had any support from various rulers of parts of India it was because those rulers either feared for their own positions or they could get the Thuggees to do their dirty work for them - for a high price of course. The Thuggees reputation for brutality, unabated crimes of the worst kind and general, overall lack of human attributes make most other singlemindedly evil groups throughout history (even in the present day) look like amateurs! The reason they fought the British so vociferously was that the British recognized this and fought to suppress them - I seriously doubt that many Indians lamented that suppression. And to the person who equated the Thuggees with French Resistance fighters killing "collaborators" - where did you get such a preposterous idea? Do you know anything at all about the history of the Indian sub-continent?

          Let me also point out here that it is the British who are the infidels not the "natives", just another example of how mixed up one can be about who is who and understanding what history and meaning really are.

          I especially love the reviewers who spend their time comparing this to another movie that they like better in order to dis this one - so they review the other movie instead. Why bother, movies stand on their own, you either like them or you don't, go watch the other one you like instead.

          5 - Now, everyone is entitled to their opinion, which I certainly support, as to whether this is a "good" or a "bad" movie (opinions are like.......well, you know) but fergawdsakes base that opinion on an informed knowledge of the times, the historical context of the work and the realization that movies are just movies - they aren't "real" and they certainly make up whatever "truth" and "facts" they see fit!

          My opinion? This is one of the great "entertainment" movies ever made - the reason to go to the movies I thought? It has everything - a good script, a good story, epic sweep, fantastic acting, inter-character chemistry, charisma, pacing and coherency. How many movies can you say that about? And kudos to those who see this movie for what it is, not what they want it to be!
          Doylenf

          or The Three Musketeers go to India...great fun...

          'Gunga Din' is the kind of film you cherish after the first viewing and then want to revisit from time to time. It stays in the memory and for valid reasons--the casting is perfect with the three buddies entering into the spirit of the whole thing--the perfect buddy movie. Cary Grant gave many fine performances on film but this is one of his greatest--heroic and funny at the same time. Sam Jaffe is excellent as the water carrier who eventually saves the regiment in what has to be one of the most thrilling endings ever conceived for an action movie. Today some of it is politcally incorrect but this is a minor flaw in a great movie. Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., Victor McLaglen and Eduardo Ciannelli are all perfectly cast. Joan Fontaine has a couple of brief scenes as the only femme in the story--but fails to ignite any interest in her bland role. Based on the famous Rudyard Kipling poem, it deserves a place at the top of the list of great adventure films produced in the 1930s. I'd love to see a technicolor version today with someone like Brendan Fraser leading the "musketeers". A real gem.
          tristanjohn-1

          One of the film classics

          In the most general of terms Gunga Din not only qualifies as a classic but more or less defines the term "classic" in every respect. I wouldn't know how to fault this film, as it succeeds on every level.

          You begin with a workable idea for a story. Then you follow that up with superb script writing, direction and photography, and wonderful performances by the entire cast. The end result of that collaboration of successful effort is, as it must be . . . a classic.

          And not only does Gunga Din succeed as a mere action adventure, which would be impressive enough, but it's comedic relief serves as a virtual workshop for aspiring directors who, lamentably today, just don't seem to get that part of the equation in all too many cases--you know, as in movie-making is an art? Or at least it used to be.

          There's seems to be a gap in our society's culture when it comes to the enjoyment of art which attempts to communicate on various intellectual levels. I would put this down to dubious education all around if I had to pick just one culprit, but I don't know, maybe that's too simplistic. I experience fear, though, when I read negative comments from viewers of films as rich in various, and to me obvious, qualities as is Gunga Din. All I hear in these cases, at best, is a fundamental lack of artistic appreciation at base.

          Well, for these people I imagine that all that's left is to simply go out and buy the cheap remakes of the classic films, which are, of course, a dime a dozen nowadays. And then I suppose they will get what they need: presumably a package of questionable casting, incompetent direction, in many instances virtually no attempt at intelligent character development whatsoever, along with x-many minutes of gratuitous violence and endless smash-ups, replete, of course, with plenty of LFE icing for this new-age filmic cake.

          Meanwhile, I hope that my daughter will come to appreciate the great films such as Gunga Din for the classic productions they were upon release, and which they certainly remain today.

          More like this

          Beau Geste
          7.5
          Beau Geste
          Only Angels Have Wings
          7.6
          Only Angels Have Wings
          The Talk of the Town
          7.5
          The Talk of the Town
          Captain Blood
          7.7
          Captain Blood
          My Favorite Wife
          7.2
          My Favorite Wife
          The Awful Truth
          7.6
          The Awful Truth
          Topper
          7.2
          Topper
          The McConnell Story
          6.3
          The McConnell Story
          Toward the Unknown
          6.5
          Toward the Unknown
          Love Begins at 20
          5.6
          Love Begins at 20
          Flight Command
          6.3
          Flight Command
          Having Wonderful Crime
          6.0
          Having Wonderful Crime

          Related interests

          Steve Martin and John Candy in Planes, Trains & Automobiles (1987)
          Buddy Comedy
          Still frame
          Adventure
          Will Ferrell in Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004)
          Comedy
          Band of Brothers (2001)
          War

          Storyline

          Edit

          Did you know

          Edit
          • Trivia
            The gong in the title sequence is the same one used to summon King Kong six years earlier.
          • Goofs
            In every scene with the snake pit, the strings making them move are visible.
          • Quotes

            Sgt. Thomas 'Tommy' Ballantine: You displease me greatly, and I ignore the both of you.

          • Crazy credits
            The credits appear on a gong. Standing next to the gong is a Hindu man, and every time he strikes the gong, the credits change.
          • Alternate versions
            German theatrical version was cut by approx. 12 minutes. This version was later shown on TV but never released on any home media format. Only in 2018 the film was released on DVD, with approx. 4 minutes restored.
          • Connections
            Featured in Look Back in Anger (1959)
          • Soundtracks
            God Save the King!
            (1744) (uncredited)

            Written by Henry Carey

            Incorporated into the music score

          Top picks

          Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
          Sign in

          FAQ18

          • How long is Gunga Din?Powered by Alexa

          Details

          Edit
          • Release date
            • February 17, 1939 (United States)
          • Country of origin
            • United States
          • Language
            • English
          • Also known as
            • Aufstand in Sidi Hakim
          • Filming locations
            • Indian Springs Road, Alabama Hills, Lone Pine, California, USA(English fort)
          • Production company
            • RKO Radio Pictures
          • See more company credits at IMDbPro

          Box office

          Edit
          • Budget
            • $1,910,000 (estimated)
          See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

          Tech specs

          Edit
          • Runtime
            • 1h 57m(117 min)
          • Color
            • Black and White
          • Aspect ratio
            • 1.37 : 1

          Contribute to this page

          Suggest an edit or add missing content
          • Learn more about contributing
          Edit page

          More to explore

          Recently viewed

          Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
          Get the IMDb App
          Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
          Follow IMDb on social
          Get the IMDb App
          For Android and iOS
          Get the IMDb App
          • Help
          • Site Index
          • IMDbPro
          • Box Office Mojo
          • License IMDb Data
          • Press Room
          • Advertising
          • Jobs
          • Conditions of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Your Ads Privacy Choices
          IMDb, an Amazon company

          © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.