Monty Woolley is in France, fly fishing, when the radio announces the English evacuation of Dunkirk. Woolley had come to forget; his son, a flier in the RAF, is dead, and his attempts to serve in some capacity have been turned down. So here he is, occupying himself. But the other guest, an Englishwoman, at the inn he is staying at has to go elsewhere. She entrusts Woolley with her two children to get them back to England safely. They start off, but Germans slow them down. Somehow, they pick up other children to get to safety, and Ann Baxter, and even Dalio. But when they make it to the Channel, they are captured by Otto Preminger playing one of his Nasty Nazis, who is convinced that Woolley is an English spy using the children as a cover.
Is this a serious movie, or a fable? Or is there necessarily a difference between the two? Wooley gives a performance that goes from guarded and grumpy to open as he comes to realize his service is to take care of the children he has, largely unwittingly, been charged with. When Preminger prods him on what he means to do with this gaggle of children, he expounds on his decision to send them to connections in America. But had he thought this out earlier, or has it just occurred to him? Is this a well conceived idea, or just more English muddling through? I like to believe the latter, but would it make any difference to this tale of decency under threat?
With Roddy McDowall, J. Carrol Naish, Jill Esmond, and Peggy Ann Garner.
