IMDb RATING
7.1/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Documentary revealing the nature and process of the fight between the Soviet Union and Germany in the Second World War.Documentary revealing the nature and process of the fight between the Soviet Union and Germany in the Second World War.Documentary revealing the nature and process of the fight between the Soviet Union and Germany in the Second World War.
- Nominated for 1 Oscar
- 3 wins & 1 nomination total
Anthony Veiller
- Narrator
- (voice)
Ion Antonescu
- Self
- (archive footage)
Nikolay Cherkasov
- Alexander Nevsky
- (archive footage)
Anthony Eden
- Self
- (archive footage)
Alexander Edler von Daniels
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as General Edler von Daniels)
Edgar Garrik
- King Charles XII of Sweden
- (archive footage)
- (as Ye. Karrik)
Hermann Göring
- Self
- (archive footage)
Adolf Hitler
- Self
- (archive footage)
Miklós Horthy
- Self
- (archive footage)
Alfred Jodl
- Self
- (archive footage)
Kaiser Wilhelm II
- Self
- (archive footage)
Wilhelm Keitel
- Self
- (archive footage)
King Boris III
- Self
- (archive footage)
King Michael
- Self
- (archive footage)
General Kosakov
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Col. General Kosakoff)
Maxim Litvinov
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Maxim Litvinoff)
Yôsuke Matsuoka
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Yosuke Matsuoka)
Vyacheslav Molotov
- Self
- (archive footage)
Featured reviews
This is certainly not only one of the most singular documentaries ever made but also one of the best. Frank Capra and Anatole Litvak made it together, striking at the opportunity of documenting the fate of Russia in the war and catching an extensive and comprehensive picture of the Russian situation while it was fresh and still going on, concentrating on the siege of Leningrad and the battle of Stalingrad, ending with the definite turning point of the war. The entire documentary is dominated by Russian music, 75-80% Tchaikovsky with some moments of Shostakovich, Prokofiev and folk music. The account is effective and intelligent all the way, the film rolls on like the war without mercy in tremendous overwhelming realism, while at the same time there is much vital information here that never came across to the west. The only objection against the film anyone could have is the aggressive tone of the speaker, which is as hard as the war, - but even that fits into the picture. It's a great classic documentary for all time without any Hollywood embellishments or tricks, everything is documentary and true, and although it IS a propaganda picture, made to gain support for the Russian cause in the war from the public in the west, it's brilliantly done, and the glory of the victories and ordeals of Stalingrad and Leningrad WAS THERE and must never be forgotten.
For some reason, I always felt that this front of WWII was always the most horrendous, and this two-parter goes some way to poignantly illustrating that. Using a combination of animated maps and plenty of wartime newsreel, it takes us into the heart of the Soviet Union as the encroaching Nazis crushed all before them. It's striking that though much of Western Europe was industrialised, the population facing this onslaught was a largely agrarian one still using scythes, horse-drawn ploughs and with little access to electricity. Initially, this looks like it's going to be a cake-walk for the invaders, but when they arrive at Stalingrad they find that the population have regrouped and doubled their efforts, in spite of the sub-zero conditions and lack of supplies and ordnance, and together with supplies from the British and the Americans are now starting to make their own presence felt. The second part of this documentary focuses a little more on the fight back and leaves us with some degree of optimism that there might be light at the end of this very, very, long winter. The actuality here is really potent and augmented by a narration that avoids jingoism and sentiment and let's the imagery speak for itself. Sure, it does have a propagandist function to an extent, but when you see the starved bodies of young children, or the raped ones of young women alive and dead, then you don't really need anyone in a sound booth to describe what you can see or what to think about it. It's clearly intended for an American audience and effectively extols that principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend - regardless of doctrine.
First of all, this is not a history lesson. This is a film made during the wartime to garner public support for war effort and so whatever propaganda people might complain about is acceptable. Enemy of your enemy is your friend and during WW2, Russia became an ally of allied powers.
The movie talks in details about Russia's rich resources and what would happen to the world of Nazi power got control of it. After that they have taken few big events and given real footage of the battle. The scale of the allied support is captured correctly. The movie takes 50 mins to go over entire 2 and a half year of great struggle so instead of going over every important detail, the director decided to go with the human element of the war. It's more appealing because of it. I hope to see many such movies of how allies worked with each other to dethrone largest military force in human history.
The movie talks in details about Russia's rich resources and what would happen to the world of Nazi power got control of it. After that they have taken few big events and given real footage of the battle. The scale of the allied support is captured correctly. The movie takes 50 mins to go over entire 2 and a half year of great struggle so instead of going over every important detail, the director decided to go with the human element of the war. It's more appealing because of it. I hope to see many such movies of how allies worked with each other to dethrone largest military force in human history.
Comparing it to Capra's Prelude to War, The Battle of Russia doesn't feel quite so in-your-face as a propaganda movie. Some of the same techniques are there, but it feels a little more like it's trying to inform. There is informing and persuasion going on here for sure, but the way it slightly backs off the latter does probably make it a "better" documentary, while also making it feel a little less interesting to try and unpack.
But when considered as something that wanted to look at what had been happening in Russia during World War II, and made while World War II was still going on, it's certainly interesting. It's doubly fascinating to hear an American documentary talk about Soviet Russia in such a positive light (something something, the enemy of my enemy is my friend).
But when considered as something that wanted to look at what had been happening in Russia during World War II, and made while World War II was still going on, it's certainly interesting. It's doubly fascinating to hear an American documentary talk about Soviet Russia in such a positive light (something something, the enemy of my enemy is my friend).
Seven stars. With a little round-up. Because the stuff-blowing-up montages went on too long. Because the stock footage that purported
to be of happy workers in Leningrad should have been showing us skeletal stick
figures. Because Capra just couldn't help being Capra in those scenes of the
people either viewing their destroyed homes and families, or reveling in a faux
return to normalcy during Christmas 1943. And because the film so carefully
ignored things like the Soviet attacks on Poland and Finland in 1939-40. But worth the round-up because the tactical footage was fantastic. And because the film
really did do a good job of showing the "average American" why we were spending
so much to arm the Russians. I also liked the dissection of the strategies of
the two armies on the Eastern front. These WW2 Hollywood propaganda films are
fascinating artifacts. Capra made a bunch of them, without ever getting his
hands dirty. I'm happy that a bunch of them have become available for streaming. I hardly ever find anything I want to watch on N3tfl!x's streaming site. So I have to give them props for this film.
2 November 2020.
2 November 2020.
Did you know
- TriviaThis film is in the public domain; it was never registered or renewed.
- Alternate versionsA version exists where the film is divided into two parts because of its length. There are extra titles to explain this division, and a short recapitulation of Part I is found at the beginning of Part II.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Battle of China (1944)
- How long is The Battle of Russia?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Battle of Russia: The Nazi March Frozen
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content