The Inheritance

This little known film disappeared into obscurity and without much comment after its release in 1947. It has resurfaced on British TV in recent years where it has been given several matinee showings. BBC readapted the Sheridan Le Fanu novel as "The Dark Angel" for its classic novel Christmas offering in 1987. In Peter O'Toole they found a much more striking eponymous villain than Derrick de Marney but in every other sense it is the monochrome 'forties version that gives me the stronger pleasure. How could if fail with a heroine as touchingly vulnerable as Jeans Simmons at her most enchanting. The pair that later directed her in "So Long at the Fair" must have known of "Uncle Silas" when they opened their film with a similar wondrous closeup to our first encounter with her here. I know nothing of the director Charles Frank apart from "Uncle Silas" but the hands of a talented craftsman are clearly at the helm of this atmospheric adaptation of the Victorian Gothic melodrama about a dastardly uncle's attempt to wrest an inheritance from his trusting young niece. It is a pity that Derrick de Marney's hammy performance does not resonate with a greater sense of evil, but there is compensation in his confidante, Madame de la Rougierre who, in the hands of Katrina Paxinau, is one of cinema's most sinister female monsters. I was not disappointed when the sequence that had so fascinated me as an impressionable adolescent, where the evil governess embarks with her young charge on a journey of deception, emerged as powerfully as ever after a gap of so many years. The clock chimes of Bartram Manor that conclude this episode, like the huntsman's cry of "Gone to Earth" in the Powell and Pressburger masterpiece are among my most haunting cinematic memories. I often wonder if young audiences of today find similar marvels in the films made for them.

I read in other user comments above that several U.S. viewers have only been able to see "Uncle Silas"(1947) in the inferior and censored title of "The Inheritance".Like the original "The Wicked Lady" 1945 which had to be re-shot minus décolletage, this was released at a time in America of great prudery.I am happy to report to my said U.S.brethren that the original U.K. version is available from www.myrarefilms.co.uk for which I paid £5 or about $7 + postage in your currency.In this more liberal climate I hate films being censored, after all, I am 69,so purchase a copy of the original rather than watch an inferior copy.

Jean Simmons was born in 1929 so when asked her age (16) in "Uncle Silas" she is nearly telling her real age of 18 and very young fresh & lovely she looks.Full marks to the set & dress designers to show clothes worn by ladies in 1845.Derek de Marney for once plays a villain as Uncle Silas compared to say "Young & Innocent" (1937) directed by Hitchcock, when he played the hero wrongly accused of murdering a lady associate found strangled on a beach.Other reviewers have adequately explained the plot above but do make an effort to see this film if you like Gothic horror.

I saw this film years ago as "The Inheritance," and I never forgot it. When I read the description of "Uncle Silas," I thought it sounded suspiciously like "The Inheritance" - after all, did Jean Simmons go around playing one young heir after another? After seeing it again, I'm not surprised I remembered it.

"Uncle Silas" is a Gothic thriller, based on a novel by Sheridan Le Fanu, and directed by Charles Frank, who also directed "So Long at the Fair," another wonderful film. "Uncle Silas" is the story of a young heiress, Caroline Ruthyn (Simmons) who is sent to live with her uncle (Derrick De Marney) in a dark, eerie mansion after her father's death. Her father adored his brother, who was once accused of murder, and has made Carolina a ward of Silas. However, as he's dying, he tries to change this provision, but dies before he can do it. Silas, with the help of Caroline's ex-governess (Katina Paxinou) plan to get rid of Caroline, since the inheritance then passes to him.

The acting of especially DeMarney and Paxinou is fairly over the top, but I believe this was intentional on the part of the director to give it that good old scary Gothic feel. Sinister characters often aren't very subtle in Gothic books. Jean Simmons is lovely as Catherine - vulnerable, sweet, and naive, making her a perfect target of danger.

This story was remade as "The Dark Angel" back in the '80s - I remember the sets being completely overdone, a kind of Gothic version of Liberace's house. I don't remember much else, but I'm sure O'Toole was marvelous as Silas.

As others have pointed out, the British version is recommended.

Historical melodrama ("The Man in Grey", "The Wicked Lady", "Jassy", "Blanche Fury") was a popular genre in the British cinema of the forties, and "Uncle Silas", based upon a novel by Sheridan Le Fanu, is another example. (These films had their equivalents in the American cinema, such as "Dragonwyck"). The action takes place in the mid 19th century. The heroine, Caroline Ruthyn is a sixteen-year-old heiress. When her widowed father dies, his will appoints his younger brother Silas as her guardian. In his youth Silas had a reputation as a rake, but now everyone believes him to be a reformed character. The truth, however, is that he has only abandoned his debauched lifestyle because of failing health and dwindling finances, not because of a genuine change of heart. He greets Caroline warmly, but his affection for her is only feigned, and he is secretly plotting to get his hands on her fortune.

Some melodramas from this period, such as "Jassy" and "Blanche Fury", were made in colour, and can be seen as predecessors of the more recent "heritage cinema" movement. "Uncle Silas", however, was made in black-and-white, possibly to emphasise the Gothic elements of the story. It mostly lacks the element of bodice-ripping sexual passion which is strongly implied, if not always made explicit, in films like "The Man in Grey" or "The Wicked Lady". The only character who is chiefly motivated by sexual desire is Silas's dissolute son Dudley and his passion, for his cousin Caroline, is not returned. (Far from it. Caroline loathes Dudley and has no illusions about his true nature, even though she is still under an illusion about the true nature of his father Silas).

There are certain similarities between this film and the American-made "Dragonwyck", made the previous year. Both were set at around the same period in history and both feature a beautiful, innocent brunette heroine (Jean Simmons here, Gene Tierney in "Dragonwyck") who goes to live with a sinister relative in a gloomy Gothic mansion. There is an obvious contrast between the spacious, airy Georgian stately home which Caroline inherits from her father and Silas's ramshackle, tumbledown mediaeval or Tudor manor house. (As an impoverished younger son, he presumably cannot afford anything more commodious). At first the girl is deceived as to her relative's character- in "Dragonwyck" the heroine, Miranda, even goes so far as to marry her distant cousin Nicholas- but his true nature eventually emerges and she finds herself in danger.

The difference between this film and "Dragonwyck" lies in the way it is acted. As another reviewer has pointed out the good characters- Caroline, her father and her admirer Lord Richard Ilbury- are all played straight, whereas the evil ones- Silas, Dudley and their sidekick, Caroline's former governess, Madame de la Rougierre- are all to some extent melodramatic caricatures. The main villain in "Dragonwyck", Nicholas, is not caricatured in this way. Katina Paxinou as Madame de la Rougierre perhaps goes too far over the top, and Dudley, whose role is not a large one, is a sort of bargain-basement Squire Jasper. Derrick De Marney, however, makes a splendid villain as Silas. He was only in his early forties in 1947, but looks much older, and it is difficult to believe that he is the same man who had played the handsome young male lead in Hitchcock's "Young and Innocent" only a decade earlier. On the virtuous side, Simmons makes a luminously lovely heroine, and there is a good performance from Reginald Tate as Caroline's father Austin. The devoutly Christian Austin Ruthyn is a good man, but suffers from a character defect common among good people- he is so noble and upright that he cannot understand, or even conceive of the existence of, anyone who is less noble and upright than himself.

Today, melodramas like this one can come across as dated, with their exaggerated emotion and exaggeratedly black-and-white view of the world, represented here by the contrast between the good and the evil characters. Barbara and the saintly Caroline. Yet to anyone prepared to make allowances for the differences between contemporary tastes and those of seventy years ago, a film like "Uncle Silas" can be seen as a fine example of a once-fashionable style of film-making. 7/10.

UNCLE SILAS (called THE INHERITANCE upon initial release in the United States) fits well into the 1940s cycle of British adaptations of classic Victorian literature. Think David Lean's Dickens movies or the Alaistair Sims A CHRISTMAS CAROL, films which use gorgeous black and white photography and a blend of realism and melodrama to bring these gothic worlds to life.

Of course, UNCLE SILAS hasn't the literary pedigree of a Dickens' work: it is quite a sensational narrative, as close to the first-wave of gothic novels from the 18th century as Victorian gothic literature gets. For the trouble of being pretty and expecting a fortune when she comes of age, the heroine Caroline is threatened by a series of sinister forces connected with her Uncle Silas, a former rake and current drug addict who needs money badly to pay off his debts. He initially tries to get her to marry his lecherous son, but when Caroline makes it loud and clear that she won't do so, his methods turn ever more cruel and murderous.

UNCLE SILAS nails the gothic mood perfectly, showing the decay of Caroline's sunny adolescence as she loses her father and falls into the hands of evil. There is a wonderful symmetry in this progression-- the film begins with a close-up of the wide-eyed Caroline and ends with a similar close-up, now emphasizing her lost innocence after barely surviving the events of the film. Jean Simmons makes the perfect gothic heroine: beautiful, spunky, and virtuous, all without coming off as cloying or too dumb to live, a rare feat for this sort of story. The music is dramatic and spooky.

So why isn't the film the equal of, say, Lean's GREAT EXPECTATIONS or OLIVER TWIST? Mainly, it has to do with two things: pacing and the villains. I love a good slow burn, especially in creepy fare, but some of the middle section of UNCLE SILAS is too slow for its own good, probably because a few of these scenes lack the sinister presence of the forces pursuing Caroline and her money.

Secondly, the villains of the story are an uneven bunch. The sexually aggressive son and the ghastly governess are both slightly comical in presentation, but manage some level of menace when terrorizing Caroline. The son makes it clear he could physically overpower Caroline without a problem and what his intentions are for her, and the governess has a garish, harsh appearance and witch-like personality which would not feel out of place in a child's nightmare. Unfortunately, Uncle Silas himself is not scary at all. He is at times enjoyably camp and I'll never say no to a good ham-fest, but he's never truly frightening, often acting more like a whiny cartoon villain than the decadent, ruthless beast he is supposed to be.

I think the inconsistent sense of dread and menace is what brings UNCLE SILAS down a few pegs. It's still a good movie and one I would recommend to other classic film fans though, as its virtues outweigh its shortcomings.