IMDb RATING
3.9/10
8.3K
YOUR RATING
The Candyman is back, trying to convince his descendent, an artist, to join him.The Candyman is back, trying to convince his descendent, an artist, to join him.The Candyman is back, trying to convince his descendent, an artist, to join him.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Wade Williams
- Samuel Kraft
- (as Wade Andrew Williams)
Jsu Garcia
- David de la Paz
- (as Nick Corri 'Jesu Garcia')
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The Candyman returns once again to torment and kill a distant relative for further undisclosed or vague reasons.
This time it's Baywatch alumni Donna D'Errico taking the lead and boring the hell out of us for the films 90 minute duration.
Granted this is a marginal step up from Farewell To The Flesh (1995) but still spotlights why the Candyman franchise died such a death.
I've never understood how Tony Todds Candyman became so iconic, how do people place him alongside the likes of Freddy, Leatherface and Jason when he had just 3 rather mediocre films to his name.
I'd like to see Candyman reborn, whether a 4th film or a reboot I don't mind but we a) Need Todd to remain the titular role and b) New writers.
The Good:
Wade Williams
Donna D'Errico is far better here than I've seen her before
The Bad:
Plot is still pretty messy
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Remaking the origin scene and making it different makes about as much sense as nipples on men
Donna D'Errico is allergic to bra's
This time it's Baywatch alumni Donna D'Errico taking the lead and boring the hell out of us for the films 90 minute duration.
Granted this is a marginal step up from Farewell To The Flesh (1995) but still spotlights why the Candyman franchise died such a death.
I've never understood how Tony Todds Candyman became so iconic, how do people place him alongside the likes of Freddy, Leatherface and Jason when he had just 3 rather mediocre films to his name.
I'd like to see Candyman reborn, whether a 4th film or a reboot I don't mind but we a) Need Todd to remain the titular role and b) New writers.
The Good:
Wade Williams
Donna D'Errico is far better here than I've seen her before
The Bad:
Plot is still pretty messy
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Remaking the origin scene and making it different makes about as much sense as nipples on men
Donna D'Errico is allergic to bra's
Saw this for the first time since I am on Candyman marathon.
Of course it was on fast forward mode.
This is the third installment in the Candyman series and a direct sequel to the 1995 film Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh.
Surprisingly the movie was made in 1999 but the events takes place in 2020.
Wow this one has good amt of nudity n since Tony Todd is the producer, he gets to kiss the nude woman. The first two has zero nudity inspite of a shower scene in part 2.
In part 2 they show that his hand was chopped off by a rusted saw n his body was rubbed with honey so that bees can wreak havoc on him n he was not tied on a crucifix/pole but he was on the ground.
In this part he was shown as tied on a crucifix n then the honey n bees stuff.
We have Wade Williams before his Prison Break stint.
Of course it was on fast forward mode.
This is the third installment in the Candyman series and a direct sequel to the 1995 film Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh.
Surprisingly the movie was made in 1999 but the events takes place in 2020.
Wow this one has good amt of nudity n since Tony Todd is the producer, he gets to kiss the nude woman. The first two has zero nudity inspite of a shower scene in part 2.
In part 2 they show that his hand was chopped off by a rusted saw n his body was rubbed with honey so that bees can wreak havoc on him n he was not tied on a crucifix/pole but he was on the ground.
In this part he was shown as tied on a crucifix n then the honey n bees stuff.
We have Wade Williams before his Prison Break stint.
I realized that I had never seen any of the Candyman movies, so I rented all three, and watched them one after another. The first two were really good. But this? The dark atmosphere has been thrown out the window. The awesome Phil Glass score is gone. Having a Baywatch chick as your lead?!! C'mon. This movie has no class. It was obviously thrown together by hacks. Heck, there's a shot of a building, where they obviously threw an orange filter over the sky in color correction, but it covers up the top of the building as well! This movie just looks cheap, which is a shame considering how well the first two were made. Candyman says "Be my victim" so many times it borders on self parody.
I have a theory that you can judge a film on its trailers. The rental for Candyman 3 included such cinematic gems as Idle Hands, The Eternal, Water Damage and The Substitute 3: The Winner Takes All. To save you looking, the average rating for said films on the IMDb is currently 4.87. Though that's still higher than the rating for Candyman 3.
Another film with the same title was also a weak third in a horror trilogy. Though George A.Romero's Day of the Dead is still streets ahead of this. The vague phallic symbolism of the Candyman's hook is here expanded upon, the sociological issues toned down, while the beautiful theme is ditched in favour of a generic pop beat. Lead Donna D'Errico has gorgeous breasts, but do we really need to see them all through the film? A plastic temptress who, like Kelly Rowan, couldn't hold a candle to Virginia Madsen, she fails to wear a bra in any single scene. She even goes topless on two occasions, one of four actresses in the movie to do so. That's Day of the Dead all over: gratuitous nudity, bad language, gore and a total lack of credibility.
The Mexican element is in no way stereotypical. No, instead characters make love to Latino guitar music after downing Tequilas. Sĕnõr. While a group of Candy disciples obviously spent so long in worshipping him they had no time for acting lessons. Poor old Candyman, marginalised in his own franchise in favour of D'Errico's nipples, resorts to saying "be my victim" about ten million times. Maybe he's really saying "bee my victim!" in reference to those lamely CGIed insects that fly around him? Perhaps not. Candyman states he wants to reclaim his dignity. Sorry, mate you lost that when you signed on for the sequels...
Another film with the same title was also a weak third in a horror trilogy. Though George A.Romero's Day of the Dead is still streets ahead of this. The vague phallic symbolism of the Candyman's hook is here expanded upon, the sociological issues toned down, while the beautiful theme is ditched in favour of a generic pop beat. Lead Donna D'Errico has gorgeous breasts, but do we really need to see them all through the film? A plastic temptress who, like Kelly Rowan, couldn't hold a candle to Virginia Madsen, she fails to wear a bra in any single scene. She even goes topless on two occasions, one of four actresses in the movie to do so. That's Day of the Dead all over: gratuitous nudity, bad language, gore and a total lack of credibility.
The Mexican element is in no way stereotypical. No, instead characters make love to Latino guitar music after downing Tequilas. Sĕnõr. While a group of Candy disciples obviously spent so long in worshipping him they had no time for acting lessons. Poor old Candyman, marginalised in his own franchise in favour of D'Errico's nipples, resorts to saying "be my victim" about ten million times. Maybe he's really saying "bee my victim!" in reference to those lamely CGIed insects that fly around him? Perhaps not. Candyman states he wants to reclaim his dignity. Sorry, mate you lost that when you signed on for the sequels...
After watching the reboot this is oscar material in comparison. Stick to original 3 movies, if you dont like 2 and 3 stay well clear of last one.
Did you know
- GoofsIt's against police procedure for detectives with no security barricade to transport prisoners. They would radio for a standard squad car to transport her.
- Quotes
[repeated line]
The Candyman: Join me in Death!
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Kill Count: Candyman 3: Day of the Dead (1999) Kill Count (2019)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content