Girls Come First

Obviously the censor must have got bored cutting out penises as they are in full view.

The women are all very pretty with nice bodies. When you've said that there is not a lot more to say about this load of rubbish. One assumed that the receipts from the Easy levy must have been more than enough to cover the cost of production.

Bill Kerr was in the radio show 'Hancock's half hour' this though is just cock (Sorry, couldn't resist) though he seems to be having a great time with the female cast.

Short but not bad Brit softcore (an extended Hardcore was made without the main cast) which doesn't waste time on plot or miss a chance for a Double Entendre or nudity.

Bert Kwok is far too good for his role which is 'of it's time' to say the least, he even has to do a bit of martial arts but it's far from Kato.

Emmanuelle is referenced cheekily as well

The girls include Rikki Howard from Hi-De-Hi. Rocker Hazel O'Connor, Heather Deeley, and the always gorgeous Sue Longhurst who stays fully clothed.

I accidentally saw some of this tripe on a minor UK channel. Of the presently 3 other reviews, two (Grover & Leo) are quite accurate, British 'sexploitation' guff from the 60s or 70s, derisory plot and dialogue, just get some tits and pubic hair on screen to please the intended audience of blokes who'd just come out of the pub on a Friday or Sat night?

Now I've seen IMDB, I realise that the lowlife magazine and club owner is played by Bill Kerr, once of radio fame with Tony Hancock. He had an American accent in this, so fooled me. His character is named 'Hugh Jampton' - so you can guess the bubbling comedy in the rest of the script?!! -- a joke I first heard in about the 3rd year (maybe 60 years ago?). Other variants of that joke wouuld be Hugh Jarss, Hugh Jears, Hugh Jooter, Hugh Jardon, Hugh Janus and Hugh Jedd (etc).

The 'plot' is almost non-existent, it's just an excuse to show some naked and admittedly very pretty girls (& some gorgeous breasts) romping with the 'star' (who I see complains that "sex films ruined my career" -- he apparently doesn't realise that he was never very likely to be getting Bafta or Oscar nominations?!).

Two of those reviews have rated this tosh as a '3' - well, as I said, there were some lovely breasts, and the star DID show his, er, 'equipment' a few times, perhaps they enjoyed that? BUT -- the other review, quite bizarre, has given the film a TEN. WHAT???!! This is SUPPOSED to be OUT of TEN on IMDB. . .not a million?!

Give THIS twaddle a TEN, and what do you score, say, Casablanca, Some Like It Hot, Schindler's List, etc (put in your own fav great films)?!! Just bonkers!