Witch from the first Witchcraft movie stalks the now teenage child. She attempts to kill his friends in order to slowly corrupt him to Satan. However the boy is able to defeat the evil Satan... Read allWitch from the first Witchcraft movie stalks the now teenage child. She attempts to kill his friends in order to slowly corrupt him to Satan. However the boy is able to defeat the evil Satanic witch, and not enter into Evil with her.Witch from the first Witchcraft movie stalks the now teenage child. She attempts to kill his friends in order to slowly corrupt him to Satan. However the boy is able to defeat the evil Satanic witch, and not enter into Evil with her.
Charles Solomon Jr.
- William Adams
- (as Charles Solomon)
David Homb
- Boomer
- (as David L. Homb)
Mia M. Ruiz
- Michelle
- (as Mia Ruiz)
John Henry Richardson
- Mr. Adams
- (as Jay Richardson)
Mary Shelley
- Elizabeth Stocton
- (as Mary Shelly)
Anat Topol
- Grace Churchill
- (as Anat Topol-Barzilai)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Not that I really liked this movie, in fact, I watched only part 1 and 2. The first was OK, but the second was so much worse that I never watched a Witchcraft movie again. It seems to me that you are all with me, but what I can't understand is why the h**l you watch FIVE other sequels too if you thought this one was so awful??????
WITCHCRAFT II, the first sequel to it's decent predecessor is without a doubt the worst horror film in history(So far anyway.) This time the baby from the original is grown up and living with foster parents. Suddenly an evil witch who looks like a Madonna wannabe stalks him to teach him his birthright...BIG deal! Extremely boring, terrible story, acting(Except for Charles Solomon as the teenager.), and laughable effects. Other films in the series to avoid: IV, VII, and VIII(I haven't seen X and XI(!)yet.) * out of *****.
Evil witch tries to lure the surviving baby from part I, now a teenager into the forces of darkness. Not quite as bad as the original, but still awful by any means. Frequent nudity and some violence & sex doesn't help, but actually make things worse. Rated R; Nudity, Violence, Profanity, and Sexual Situations.
I'm binging the Witchcraft franchise, all 16 of them and was regretting making this decision after the mess that was the first film.
Outstandingly Witchcraft 2 actually manages to be worse and that was a feat I wasn't expecting.
It follows on from the first film with the baby now a teenager (Played by a guy who looks about 30). Now an evil temptress is after him, can he resist her or is he doomed to fall into satans plan?
Honestly, I didn't care. From the baffling daft story to the awful performances to the hokey effects this was an utter mess.
I do hope they get better, for the sake of my health!
The Good:
Follows on from the first film
The Bad:
Awful effects
Dreadful plot
Incredibly boring
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Some movies should come with warning labels such as "May be hazardous to mental wellbeing" or "May bring you out in a rash, watch in moderation"
Outstandingly Witchcraft 2 actually manages to be worse and that was a feat I wasn't expecting.
It follows on from the first film with the baby now a teenager (Played by a guy who looks about 30). Now an evil temptress is after him, can he resist her or is he doomed to fall into satans plan?
Honestly, I didn't care. From the baffling daft story to the awful performances to the hokey effects this was an utter mess.
I do hope they get better, for the sake of my health!
The Good:
Follows on from the first film
The Bad:
Awful effects
Dreadful plot
Incredibly boring
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Some movies should come with warning labels such as "May be hazardous to mental wellbeing" or "May bring you out in a rash, watch in moderation"
My review was written in June 1990 after watching the movie on Academy video cassette.
This sequel to the 1988 video picture is an effective showcase for the charms of newcomer Delia Sheppard. This is another direct-to-video release, but Sheppard will be featured on the big-screen in "Rocky V".
She plays a temptress, out to charm young hero Charles Solomon who's been groomed (unknown to him) as the supreme warlock to take over the world. As detailed in the first film (flashbacks of which are presented here), Solomon's parents and foster parents all practiced witchcraft.
Opposing Sheppard are the local reverend (Frank Woods), whose daughter Mia Ruiz is Solomon's girlfriend. One cute gag has Woods complaining about exorcism that "Catholics are so much better than Methodists at this".
Direction by Mark Woods is okay, though the climax is directed too much like a heavy metal music video. Center of attention is Sheppard, previously seen in the barely released "Sexbomb". She's severely styled as a dominating blonde hellcat in trashy, revealing costumes. Her campy performance tags Sheppard as the '90s answer to Mamie Van Doren.
Tech credits, especially the optical effects, are chintzy.
This sequel to the 1988 video picture is an effective showcase for the charms of newcomer Delia Sheppard. This is another direct-to-video release, but Sheppard will be featured on the big-screen in "Rocky V".
She plays a temptress, out to charm young hero Charles Solomon who's been groomed (unknown to him) as the supreme warlock to take over the world. As detailed in the first film (flashbacks of which are presented here), Solomon's parents and foster parents all practiced witchcraft.
Opposing Sheppard are the local reverend (Frank Woods), whose daughter Mia Ruiz is Solomon's girlfriend. One cute gag has Woods complaining about exorcism that "Catholics are so much better than Methodists at this".
Direction by Mark Woods is okay, though the climax is directed too much like a heavy metal music video. Center of attention is Sheppard, previously seen in the barely released "Sexbomb". She's severely styled as a dominating blonde hellcat in trashy, revealing costumes. Her campy performance tags Sheppard as the '90s answer to Mamie Van Doren.
Tech credits, especially the optical effects, are chintzy.
Did you know
- TriviaShot in thirteen days.
- Crazy creditsPrior to the opening credits there is a disclaimer, the unusual portion of which reads: "This movie is for entertainment purposes. Academy Entertainment, Inc. does not advocate or endorse any of the activities or the ideas contained herein. This movie is not intended as an accurate portrayal of true witches."
- ConnectionsFeatured in 31 Days of Horror: Witchcraft 2 (1989) (2009)
- How long is Witchcraft II: The Temptress?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Колдовство 2: Соблазнительница
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $80,000 (estimated)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content