Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalHispanic Heritage MonthIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Time Machine

  • 2002
  • PG-13
  • 1h 36m
IMDb RATING
6.0/10
134K
YOUR RATING
POPULARITY
4,616
722
Guy Pearce and Samantha Mumba in The Time Machine (2002)
Trailer
Play trailer0:31
3 Videos
99+ Photos
SteampunkTime TravelActionAdventureSci-Fi

Hoping to alter the events of the past, a 19th century inventor instead travels 800,000 years into the future, where he finds humankind divided into two warring races.Hoping to alter the events of the past, a 19th century inventor instead travels 800,000 years into the future, where he finds humankind divided into two warring races.Hoping to alter the events of the past, a 19th century inventor instead travels 800,000 years into the future, where he finds humankind divided into two warring races.

  • Director
    • Simon Wells
  • Writers
    • H.G. Wells
    • David Duncan
    • John Logan
  • Stars
    • Guy Pearce
    • Yancey Arias
    • Mark Addy
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    6.0/10
    134K
    YOUR RATING
    POPULARITY
    4,616
    722
    • Director
      • Simon Wells
    • Writers
      • H.G. Wells
      • David Duncan
      • John Logan
    • Stars
      • Guy Pearce
      • Yancey Arias
      • Mark Addy
    • 720User reviews
    • 113Critic reviews
    • 42Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Nominated for 1 Oscar
      • 2 wins & 4 nominations total

    Videos3

    The Time Machine
    Trailer 0:31
    The Time Machine
    The Time Machine
    Trailer 2:21
    The Time Machine
    The Time Machine
    Trailer 2:21
    The Time Machine
    The Time Machine 2002
    Trailer 1:59
    The Time Machine 2002

    Photos157

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 150
    View Poster

    Top cast71

    Edit
    Guy Pearce
    Guy Pearce
    • Alexander Hartdegen
    Yancey Arias
    Yancey Arias
    • Toren
    Mark Addy
    Mark Addy
    • David Philby
    Phyllida Law
    Phyllida Law
    • Mrs. Watchit
    Sienna Guillory
    Sienna Guillory
    • Emma
    Laura Kirk
    Laura Kirk
    • Flower Seller
    Josh Stamberg
    Josh Stamberg
    • Motorist
    John W. Momrow
    • Fifth Avenue Carriage Driver
    Max Baker
    Max Baker
    • Robber
    Jeffrey M. Meyer
    • Central Park Carriage Driver
    Jeremy Irons
    Jeremy Irons
    • Über-Morlock
    Alan Young
    Alan Young
    • Flower Store Worker
    Myndy Crist
    • Jogger
    Connie Ray
    Connie Ray
    • Teacher
    Orlando Jones
    Orlando Jones
    • Vox
    Lennie Loftin
    Lennie Loftin
    • Soldier #1
    Thomas Corey Robinson
    • Soldier #2
    Samantha Mumba
    Samantha Mumba
    • Mara
    • Director
      • Simon Wells
    • Writers
      • H.G. Wells
      • David Duncan
      • John Logan
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews720

    6.0134.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    6SnoopyStyle

    Well made but a letdown

    Alexander Hartdegen (Guy Pearce) is a scientist living in 1899 NYC. He proposes to his girlfriend Emma, but she's killed in a robbery. Four years later, he builds a time machine. However when he tries going back to rescue Emma, she is killed in a different way. Disenchanted, he travels forward in time to 2030 to search for a way to change the past. However he finds nothing about time travel. He jumps forward another 7 years to find the world in collapse and chaos after the moon is destroyed. He tries to use his time machine again but an explosion knocks him out. The machine keeps running until 802,701 AD when he regains consciousness.

    The movie works well for awhile, but the future world of Eloi and Morlock is a bit of a letdown. It takes the H. G. Wells world and makes a Planet of the Apes movie out of it. In the end, the well-made movie is let down by this. Also there is an uncompelling action ending. The movie just has nothing profound to say, and is a barely functional action movie.
    bob the moo

    Not terrible – just heartless

    When Victorian scientist Alexander Hartdegen sees his fiancé murdered during a petty robbery, he throws himself into his work while all even his closest friends know is that he is doing nonsense research and physics. Four years later though and Alexander has created his machine – a time machine – that he plans to use to return to the fateful night and save his true love. Somehow he cannot do it though and, in despair, he drives himself forward into the future to find progress beyond his wildest dreams. This progress though, comes with costs and risks – both of which Alexander is very aware of as he moves into a world where mankind has changed beyond all recognition.

    This film was wildly derided when it came out in the cinemas and I never bothered to go and see it, preferring to let time pass and pick it up for free on television in a few years. That time came recently and I watched a version of HG Wells' Time Machine that is loosely based on the source material. It starts with potential but all too quickly it becomes obvious and surprisingly heartless – almost making a conscious decision that the effects will be what people come for and that doing a solid job on those will be enough. Sadly that is not the case but, were it, the effects are already superseded and do not look as impressive as they once may have done. With the humanity and the emotion built into the story, the delivery is quite stiff and dull and I found myself surprised by how little interest I had it the story even when I was far into it. Not totally sure where the problems lie with this but script is certainly one of them (some of the dialogue and exposition is terribly clunky) while the overall production did appear effects driven.

    It is a shame because Guy Pearce frequently offers more from his performance and his potential but the film never really takes him up on it and it leaves him isolated, trying to be a character in a film that would seem to just prefer an action hero. Mumba looks good (if you ignore that at times her face is chimp-like, and no it is not racist to say so) but she cannot act for toffee – she didn't even run and scream all that convincingly. God knows what about the film made Irons decide to do his poor character but he is not alone as other famous faces such as Bloom and Addey show up.

    The Time Machine is not the awful film that some say but it is just very heartless and dull. Some of the effects are good and the plot did have potential but the script and design never let this come out, seemingly more interested in visual bang-for-buck than they were about producing an effective and engaging story.
    7miabroughton

    Such a good storyline and a great concept

    I first watchd this flm with my parents who, when rewatching it with me, felt so nostalgic. I didn't get that feeling obviously being younger, however I can tell how magical this film would have been to them previously because I felt it even now.

    I really liked this film. I thought the great storyline of time travel and the sets I thought were amazing. The time machine itself as a prop and his I think its like a study or an office I thought was gorgeous in the way it looked.

    Brilliant acting I thought from everyone, intersesting concepts and just overall a very enjoyable film to watch.

    I strongly reccomend!
    nz man

    We 4 hard critics actually liked this film! Great music, and more...

    The four of us are in the 40 - 50 age range, and we are fairly tough what we like and do not like in films. It was Friday night and we wanted entertainment. We read the comments below - mostly, but not all negative - and decided to take a gamble. Arriving at the cinema, we were prepared for a bad movie but hoping for 'a good relaxing time'. Well, we *did* like this film! Not a top box office smash or even an 8 out of 10, but entertaining nevertheless. The MUSIC was superb. ACTING was fine. HISTORIC life portrayed in old Cambridge Massachusetts was realistic - even the snow and cold weather was real. The ROMANCE was acceptable. The STORY, while not closely following H G Well, was good enough. The SPECIAL EFFECTS were very good indeed. It is worth a gamble, to see this film. But go with a light heart and an acceptable frame of mind, and keep your expectations below that of a 10 out of 10 film.
    8dimadick

    Interesting but flawed

    Since Herbert George Wells(1866-1946)' "The Time Machine" happens to be one of my favorite novels I was interested in this film mainly to see how the old man's great-grandson would handle his legacy.This film left me with mixed feelings.Many good points and many bad ones.

    The Good:I truly enjoyed the 19th centurie scenes with Alexander and Emma.Her tragic death and Alexander's wish to change it provides our Time Traveler with serious motivation that he seemed to luck in the book.His obsession with his work is another good point.When you turn all your efforts towards one point then it is more probable that you will achieve your goals.The scenes while the machine is operating are visualy beautiful.Alexander as a "wandering fool" and his amazement at the 21st centurie achievements are well done.The Uber-Morlock was quite impressive, his seing the memories, dreams and nightmares of others seem to have left him with a lot of wisdom.His lack of emotions in a matter of survival for himself and his race is understandable.Why should he be shocked?Humanity has fed on flesh for milenia.We knowed and we don't get shocked by it.Why should he be?He actualy seems evolved rather than devolved as the other Morlocks.

    The Bad:In the original novel humanity supposedly reached a golden age.The upper-class used the lower-class to achiebe its dream.A life with no worries.The upper-class lived in magnificent towers while the lower class was forced to live below the earth, in tunnels.As time went on the upper-class evolved to the Eloi living in a paradise.Childlike in appearance and in nature.Their luck of problems left them with no need to studie and eventualy all the wisdom of their founders was lost.They were left using achievements they couldn't understand and couldn't maintaine.The lower-class evolved into the Morlocks.Forgotten by the Eloi they were left to feed on each other and eventualy reached the surface and started feeding on the Eloi.Both races were devolved when the Time Traveler arrived.The only person from this time he actualy likes was Weena a young Eloi girl he saved who grew attached to him.In the novel they wander around studying the state of decline the human races had reached.

    Unfortunately all this history of the two races is lost in this movie.The plot about the Moon falling was rather ridiculous and hardly explained the evolution of the two races.The Eloi of the film are much more inteligent than those in the movie but nothing interesting is truly done with them.I was hoping to see Alexander trying to teach his new roomates some of his wisdom.But nothing like this happens.Why would Alexander be interested in those two races isn't explained.Why would he pass two chances to return to his time isn't expained at all.What gives him the right to kill the Morlocks is left equaly unexplained.The "Happy" ending leaves him living in a time that shouldn't held any interest for a science-loving man.Nothing to explore or study.After his experience with time travel I don't think he would just be content left in one or the other point of the time stream.Rather unfortunate progress.

    It could have been a classic if only the finale didn't resemble stupid adventure movies rather than the original novel or any other piece of fiction with an actual interest in the concept of time traveling.Alas the Wells family seems to be devolving too.

    Best Emmys Moments

    Best Emmys Moments
    Discover nominees and winners, red carpet looks, and more from the Emmys!

    More like this

    The Time Machine
    7.5
    The Time Machine
    Evolution
    6.1
    Evolution
    Frequency
    7.4
    Frequency
    Waterworld
    6.3
    Waterworld
    Wild Wild West
    4.9
    Wild Wild West
    The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
    5.8
    The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
    Reign of Fire
    6.2
    Reign of Fire
    Sphere
    6.1
    Sphere
    The Time Machine
    5.1
    The Time Machine
    John Carter
    6.6
    John Carter
    Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
    6.1
    Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
    Hellboy
    6.9
    Hellboy

    Related interests

    Alfred Abel, Brigitte Helm, and Rudolf Klein-Rogge in Metropolis (1927)
    Steampunk
    Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd in Back to the Future (1985)
    Time Travel
    Bruce Willis in Die Hard (1988)
    Action
    Still frame
    Adventure
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
    Sci-Fi

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      The director Simon Wells is the great-grandson of H.G. Wells, who wrote the 1895 novel upon which the film is based.
    • Goofs
      When Alexander travels to the year 635,427,810, he witnesses a barren landscape littered with Morlock caves as far as the eye can see, and he sees what looks like humans, presumably the Eloi, being led away in chains by the Morlocks. In all of this time, it seems unbelievable that neither race would have evolved into other races, remaining the same, especially since humans had split into two races within just 800,000 years.
    • Quotes

      Über-Morlock: We all have our time machines, don't we. Those that take us back are memories... And those that carry us forward, are dreams.

    • Connections
      Featured in HBO First Look: The Time Machine (2002)
    • Soundtracks
      Sweet Rosie O'Grady
      Written by Maude Nugent (as Maude Nugent Jerome)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ25

    • How long is The Time Machine?Powered by Alexa
    • What is 'The Time Machine' about?
    • Is 'The Time Machine' based on a book?
    • Why is George from the 1960 movie called Alexander Hartdegen in this version?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 8, 2002 (United States)
    • Countries of origin
      • United States
      • United Arab Emirates
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • La máquina del tiempo
    • Filming locations
      • New England Building, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, USA(Interior Opening Scene)
    • Production companies
      • Warner Bros.
      • DreamWorks Pictures
      • Parkes/MacDonald Image Nation
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $80,000,000 (estimated)
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $56,832,494
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $22,610,437
      • Mar 10, 2002
    • Gross worldwide
      • $123,729,176
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 36m(96 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
      • SDDS
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.