IMDb RATING
7.0/10
7.8K
YOUR RATING
Trio of stories about lesbian couples in three different decades.Trio of stories about lesbian couples in three different decades.Trio of stories about lesbian couples in three different decades.
- Won 1 Primetime Emmy
- 7 wins & 10 nominations total
Vanessa Redgrave
- Edith Tree
- (segment "1961")
Marian Seldes
- Abby Hedley
- (segment "1961")
Paul Giamatti
- Ted Hedley
- (segment "1961")
Elizabeth Perkins
- Alice Hedley
- (segment "1961")
Jenny O'Hara
- Marge Carpenter
- (segment "1961")
Marley McClean
- Maggie Hedley
- (segment "1961")
Donald Elson
- Sam
- (segment "1961")
Susan Mosher
- Nurse June
- (segment "1961")
Lisa Welti
- Nurse Trish
- (segment "1961")
Jill Brennan
- Nurse Betty
- (segment "1961")
C.J. Bates
- Nurse Murphy
- (segment "1961")
- (as C J Bates)
Michelle Williams
- Linda
- (segment "1972")
Chloë Sevigny
- Amy
- (segment "1972")
Natasha Lyonne
- Jeanne
- (segment "1972")
Heather McComb
- Diane
- (segment "1972")
Amy Carlson
- Michelle
- (segment "1972")
Lee Garlington
- Georgette
- (segment "1972")
7.07.8K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Three Very Different Stories
I have to admit that I approached the viewing of this movie with some apprehension. But as it turned out, I enjoyed it very much.
The film consists of three separate stories dealing with lesbianism set at different times and featuring characters from three distinct age groups.
The first, set in 1961, and the best of the three, features an outstanding performance by the marvellous Vanessa Redgrave as a retired school teacher who suddenly loses her lifelong companion. She suddenly finds that all of the things she has taken for granted are suddenly gone, including the roof over her head. The vignette shows how lesbianism was never talked about in public in the 60s as evidenced in the hospital scenes where Redgrave attempts to find out what has happened to her "friend". Paul Giamatti plays the deceased's nephew who has to tell Redgrave that she no longer can remain in her home of 30 years. Elizabeth Perkins effectively plays his scavenging wife.
The second story, set in 1972, deals with the relationship between a college co-ed (Michelle Williams) and a girl who likes dress in macho male attire (Chloe Sevigny). I found myself actually hoping that they would live happily ever after.
The last story concerns the often humorous efforts of two mature companions (Ellen DeGeneres, Sharon Stone)to "have a baby".
Although not for everyone, I found that this movie was tastefully done and very well acted.
The film consists of three separate stories dealing with lesbianism set at different times and featuring characters from three distinct age groups.
The first, set in 1961, and the best of the three, features an outstanding performance by the marvellous Vanessa Redgrave as a retired school teacher who suddenly loses her lifelong companion. She suddenly finds that all of the things she has taken for granted are suddenly gone, including the roof over her head. The vignette shows how lesbianism was never talked about in public in the 60s as evidenced in the hospital scenes where Redgrave attempts to find out what has happened to her "friend". Paul Giamatti plays the deceased's nephew who has to tell Redgrave that she no longer can remain in her home of 30 years. Elizabeth Perkins effectively plays his scavenging wife.
The second story, set in 1972, deals with the relationship between a college co-ed (Michelle Williams) and a girl who likes dress in macho male attire (Chloe Sevigny). I found myself actually hoping that they would live happily ever after.
The last story concerns the often humorous efforts of two mature companions (Ellen DeGeneres, Sharon Stone)to "have a baby".
Although not for everyone, I found that this movie was tastefully done and very well acted.
An excellent movie, well worth seeing...
I saw this film on the recommendation of a friend. In fact her recommendation was so good, I got the film from Amazon before I'd even seen it and as usual she was so right! The first part is moving, brilliantly acted and very, very sad. You will need tissues for this one. It may also anger you, as it did me! The treatment the old lady receives from the nephew is just appalling.
The second part is less sad. I was still moved by it and sad at times but overall it's very good. The sex scenes throughout this movie are very tasteful in my opinion. Very watchable.
The third and final part is my favourite. Ellen is such a funny and amazing actress and Sharon Stone is excellent, also. The topic discussed here is very moving, but very well dealt with. The sex scenes are sexy and yet tasteful. They are in no way pornographic as I have heard people say. The story is one that many lesbians can relate to, or maybe will relate to in the future (my self included, hopefully) and the ending makes me cry every time! My only negative point is that it wasn't longer! A full movie about this topic with these characters would be a must-see in my opinion! Perhaps someone should write one?
I think the film would be enjoyable to anyone, not just lesbians and it is well worth a look. Enjoy Charlene
The second part is less sad. I was still moved by it and sad at times but overall it's very good. The sex scenes throughout this movie are very tasteful in my opinion. Very watchable.
The third and final part is my favourite. Ellen is such a funny and amazing actress and Sharon Stone is excellent, also. The topic discussed here is very moving, but very well dealt with. The sex scenes are sexy and yet tasteful. They are in no way pornographic as I have heard people say. The story is one that many lesbians can relate to, or maybe will relate to in the future (my self included, hopefully) and the ending makes me cry every time! My only negative point is that it wasn't longer! A full movie about this topic with these characters would be a must-see in my opinion! Perhaps someone should write one?
I think the film would be enjoyable to anyone, not just lesbians and it is well worth a look. Enjoy Charlene
Lovely.
A lovely movie. Forget comments about the (apparently) "overt" love/sex scenes. If this was a movie featuring straight/heterosexual love scenes, such comments would not be made.
An interesting symmetry with the original . . . Anne Heche appeared (as actress) in the third story of "If These Walls Could Talk", and here directs and writes the third story of "ITWCT 2".
Michelle Williams (so very different than in "Dawson's Creek"!), Chloe Sevigny (always excellent), Sharon Stone, Ellen Degeneres, and (most importantly) Vanessa Redgrave give excellent performances.
A lovely, lyrical examination of lesbian love - and indeed love and life in general - throughout three very different decades.
Highly recommended.
You'll laugh . . . you'll cry . . . you'll love this movie.
An interesting symmetry with the original . . . Anne Heche appeared (as actress) in the third story of "If These Walls Could Talk", and here directs and writes the third story of "ITWCT 2".
Michelle Williams (so very different than in "Dawson's Creek"!), Chloe Sevigny (always excellent), Sharon Stone, Ellen Degeneres, and (most importantly) Vanessa Redgrave give excellent performances.
A lovely, lyrical examination of lesbian love - and indeed love and life in general - throughout three very different decades.
Highly recommended.
You'll laugh . . . you'll cry . . . you'll love this movie.
It gets you thinking'
A trilogy wrapped into one movie that covers the difficulties of lesbianism over a space of three generations. It begins with an older couple in the 60's having to deal with loss and the pain of keeping a secret for too long. Then the story brings us to a group of lesbian feminists in the 70's who fight so hard for what they believe in that they forget the point of being themselves. Finally, we're led it a problem of the new millennium that can only be solved outside of nature.
I saw the film after someone recommended it. Now that I've seen it, I'll recommend it too. The movie was good based on the fact that homosexuality is often based on the idea of sex alone, and it's not true. It's who you love. And being homosexual does have its disadvantages that hetero-couples might have. This film portrayed this idea very well.
The most poignant of these was Edith, who (after her lover died) had no ownership over their house, had no lawful right to her late-lover's property, and was even treated as if she were a mere impersonal object of her late-lover's life.
The second was the hardest to get, especially since it's in the middle of the sexual-freedom revolution. Girl meets girl, girl is a feminist, other girl is butch, girl's friends make fun of the butch girl because she doesn't fit the form of their own personal society. It might be historically accurate, but it fits vaguely with what the world is today and how women treat each other as less of a battle of male vs. female attitude.
Three is definitely the most fun, showing a couple's struggle with trying to become pregnant. It's not sad in the least, but it's still an issue that has its prevalence in the world. Becoming a mom when you're a lesbian isn't easy.
Overall, this movie was entertaining, funny, and moving. Anyone who would rent this movie if they want to have a good time and kill an evening.
I saw the film after someone recommended it. Now that I've seen it, I'll recommend it too. The movie was good based on the fact that homosexuality is often based on the idea of sex alone, and it's not true. It's who you love. And being homosexual does have its disadvantages that hetero-couples might have. This film portrayed this idea very well.
The most poignant of these was Edith, who (after her lover died) had no ownership over their house, had no lawful right to her late-lover's property, and was even treated as if she were a mere impersonal object of her late-lover's life.
The second was the hardest to get, especially since it's in the middle of the sexual-freedom revolution. Girl meets girl, girl is a feminist, other girl is butch, girl's friends make fun of the butch girl because she doesn't fit the form of their own personal society. It might be historically accurate, but it fits vaguely with what the world is today and how women treat each other as less of a battle of male vs. female attitude.
Three is definitely the most fun, showing a couple's struggle with trying to become pregnant. It's not sad in the least, but it's still an issue that has its prevalence in the world. Becoming a mom when you're a lesbian isn't easy.
Overall, this movie was entertaining, funny, and moving. Anyone who would rent this movie if they want to have a good time and kill an evening.
Different Times Different Issues
I absolutely loved this movie. I probably wouldn't have written a review, except I read the review that says unequal, and I completely disagree. I believe this movie was pretty accurate in each decade. The one that depicts 2000 was very moving and a lot different from the first decade. I think they were very brilliant to focus on the pregnancy issue. Lesbians and gay men these days want children and realize this can be a reality. I don't believe that was an issue until recent years. There is always a big focus on discrimination and unequal rights. This decade focused on the people and not only the huge issue of discrimination. It gave everyone just a little insight that lesbians and gays are people too with normal desires and needs.
I think it was a super movie and I highly recommend it.
I think it was a super movie and I highly recommend it.
Did you know
- TriviaWhen Jane Anderson saw Vanessa Redgrave's performance in the wordless scene where she's crying and the kid sees her, the director was so overwhelmed with the raw emotion Redgrave was displaying that after yelling cut she had to exit the set to get some air.
- Quotes
Edith Tree: [to Ted] If you knew your aunt at all. If you knew about all the marvelous things that she did, and how good she was, and funny. And tender. And brave. And smart. If you knew how hard she worked just to find a little peace in this life. If you knew her at all, then you'd know what she wanted. And this wasn't that. Oh my dear, it certainly wasn't that.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Saturday Night Live: Joshua Jackson/*NSYNC (2000)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content








