Christmas Child

It's Christmas time and reporter William R. Moses hasn't had a decent story to his byline for a long time. He welcomes a chance to go to Texas for a human interest story, but his real motivation is to stop in Clearwater, Texas to find out the mystery of his birth.

Moses has no family so to speak and was raised as a foundling. He's a little jealous of wife Megan Fellows with whom he will spend Christmas once again with her family.

In Clearwater, Moses does find the mystery of his birth and the reason why a whole lot of people are trying to keep him from finding out.

Christmas Child is a nice enough family holiday classic. With Christian singer Steven Curtis Chapman playing the part of a preacher in the film, it was guaranteed from the start to have a built in audience appeal. Chapman was fine in the role, truth be told the part was no stretch for him. In the film his character and his wife adopt a young foundling child, in real life Chapman and his wife adopted three Asian orphans.

Christmas Child does have a heartstring tugging ending, but one that is totally in keeping with the spirit of the movie. There is one character in this film who gets one fabulous Christmas present.

This might have been a good movie, but it just did not feel complete. It didn't feel like all the loose ends were resolved. There seemed no answer to the question of the main character's father. What happened to him? Why did the main character, the reporter, not try to find out about him? After finding out about his birth mother he seemed to have no interest in finding out about his birth father. The movie did not indicate what happened to the birth father. What was the town sheriff so out to get him? There seemed no clear explanation for that other than he didn't want him snooping around. It just left too many unanswered questions.

I had to do some math while watching this one to get the births and deaths and gifts of mangers right, but it was worth it.

I agree with some of the reviewers that the missing father issue was odd. And why the sheriff was so evil was not clearly explained (I wanted the sheriff arrested and locked up, to be honest, his nasty tone seemed out of place in the movie).

The lead is always a personable actor, but he looked too similar to the pastor, so distractingly the viewer might think they were related.

It was refreshing not to have a sappy, brain-dead, infantile Christmas movie, like has become the norm in 2020.

Love this movie 2004 Love William R Moses all the cast Muse Watson great as sheriff. We need more movies like this .Steven Curtis Chapman So beautiful thank you Bill Ewing

"Christmas Child" doesn't fit in the usual uplifting and romantic type of stories that are so popular over the Christmas holidays. But this film is quite good. It does have a sub-theme that looks at the origin and real meaning of Christmas. And that is seen through a main plot of finding family and discovery of one's roots. While it may not appeal to some people, I think this film will be very meaningful to those who have been adopted, or who have adopted children themselves or had to give up a child for adoption. That would be several million in North America alone, and as many in Europe and perhaps other areas. Most people grow up with their biological mom, or dad, or both. So, they don't ask where they came from or who their parents were. But, for those of us who have been adopted, it's quite different. It's a natural thing to wonder about who a mom or dad or parents were and to want to find out something about them.

This film treats this subject in a very good way. I rate it highly for that reason. And it would rate still higher but for one main character who is not essential to the story, and for some aspects of the script and film that are distractions, or that don't fit well or make much sense.

I won't give the story away, but will note these few points and shortcomings. William Moses gives a mostly superb portrayal of Jack Davenport. But, in the opening scenes, it's not quite clear why his relationship seems so cold with his wife, Meg, played by Megan Follows. One can't help thinking that love has gone out of their lives - that he no longer loves Meg. Jack has been grieving his adopted father's death nine months earlier, Now he is curious about his blood parents when he finds a photo and keepsake items in his dad's safety deposit box. But why should this make him is so cool toward his wife? Not once when they talk on the phone and he calls her from Texas, does he say that he loves her. Was an intentional aspect of the film - to have viewers think there was no longer love there and their marriage was falling apart? It's a further distraction that could easily have been eliminated just by Jack telling Meg at the end of one or two phone calls, that he loves her. That would further drive home the notion that something else is bothering Jack deeply.

Finally, I could see no purposes whatsoever in the character of the sheriff, Jimmy-James, played by Muse Watson. If anything, his inclusion and Jack's interplay with him act like red herrings to the story. They have nothing to do with the plot. Instead, this gives a negative drift to the film. Was it intended to portray a southern red-neck sheriff who resents a city-sicker coming to town? Especially one from up North? Because that's sure what it looks like. Now, the sheriff wasn't crass or crude or bombastic in anyway. He was rather calm and cool. But he had nothing better to do in the town than watch, pursue and nitpick with a pleasant journalist from out of town? There is one hint that Jimmy-James's harassing streak comes from jealousy. When Jack first goes into Kirby's Café to look over the pictures taken by the late Rev. Krause, and the waitress, Cindy, pays more attention to him than to Jimmy-James, the sheriff flashes an ornery look on his face.

But, again, all the incidents with the sheriff and Jack after that don't fit the story overall, and they detract more than they help the story. If anything, they paint Jack as something of a dummy. One doesn't challenge a law officer who's doing his job, however picayunish it may seem. And, the sheriff's hounding Jack makes him to look like a red-neck with nothing better to do. Everything of substance about this story could be told and more meaningfully, with the sheriff's character eliminated entirely - or changed to eliminate the disputes.

The movie was filmed in Okmulgee, Oklahoma, as the fictional town of Clearwater, Texas. The street scenes clearly show a small town of the range of 10,000 or so population. Such towns usually have a few churches, not just one community church. There is a line by Jack late in the film that refers to other churches in the town. That makes it a little odd that all the people that Jack meets in this story would be members of or attend this one church. And, for the annual Christmas Eve program at the nearly life-sized hand carved nativity scene, the gathering doesn't seem very large if the nativity scene is the pride of the community. One other small goof in the script is when Jack is invited to the celebration at Stafford's barn. He doesn't ask for directions, and the person doesn't tell him how to find it

This movie is based on a short story by Max Lucado, "The Christmas Cross." He revised it in 2003 and changed the title to "The Christmas Child: A Story of Coming Home." The film has a very good ending that fits perfectly with the themes of family and Christmas. Here are a couple of lines from the film

Dan, the helper in the church, "Christmas Eve. Special service. You plannin' on comin?" Jack Davenport, "I'll think about it." Dan, "It's a good thing God didn't think about it. He did it. He came. Now, that's somethin' to think about."

Judge, "I figure he worked 10 years carving this nativity scene."