Dr. Warick discovered a miraculous drug that might cure certain types of madness, but found that there was a dreadful side effect. 20 years later, he is locked away in a straitjacket and dru... Read allDr. Warick discovered a miraculous drug that might cure certain types of madness, but found that there was a dreadful side effect. 20 years later, he is locked away in a straitjacket and drug makers want to release the drug to the public.Dr. Warick discovered a miraculous drug that might cure certain types of madness, but found that there was a dreadful side effect. 20 years later, he is locked away in a straitjacket and drug makers want to release the drug to the public.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
John Webster
- Harris
- (as Terry Aaron)
- Directors
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
2.7329
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
GREAT idea: BAD movie
The artwork on the box that this DVD came in was infinitely more entertaining than the film (using that term loosely) itself.
I feel as though the creators of this film had a very good Stephen King type idea, but miserably failed at making it into a watchable movie.
Great story. Poor acting and poor filming, perhaps due to a poor budget?
Maybe someone out there will see this movie and re-create it to it's full potential...
I feel as though the creators of this film had a very good Stephen King type idea, but miserably failed at making it into a watchable movie.
Great story. Poor acting and poor filming, perhaps due to a poor budget?
Maybe someone out there will see this movie and re-create it to it's full potential...
What a Joke
If this film was an intentional spoof, this film may have been watchable. What i find infuriating is that it was a serious horror flick. What a joke.
Of course, having a low budget will give complications and limit ones vision, but this film made no sense, the lighting was poor the sound was at a low and I have never seen such a bunch of wooden talentless actors. I'm just puzzled on how a film like this gets commissioned.
The plot was weak, it seemed to be based on a computer game as issues within the film were vague and when you feel there going to get to the point, it trails off into nowhere.
The camera work was sleepy, this is due to the directors lack of direction. How many wide shots would you like in a sequence. Far too many were used. i felt you are cheated out of beats because of this
To top it off, it was dubbed. A very poor attempt. I don't find the low budget to be a valid excuse as university projects are of better quality. If I handed this into my tutor. It would be a first class fail.
Uri Gellar? Get a grip.
Of course, having a low budget will give complications and limit ones vision, but this film made no sense, the lighting was poor the sound was at a low and I have never seen such a bunch of wooden talentless actors. I'm just puzzled on how a film like this gets commissioned.
The plot was weak, it seemed to be based on a computer game as issues within the film were vague and when you feel there going to get to the point, it trails off into nowhere.
The camera work was sleepy, this is due to the directors lack of direction. How many wide shots would you like in a sequence. Far too many were used. i felt you are cheated out of beats because of this
To top it off, it was dubbed. A very poor attempt. I don't find the low budget to be a valid excuse as university projects are of better quality. If I handed this into my tutor. It would be a first class fail.
Uri Gellar? Get a grip.
Diagnosis: terminally lame
This boring british video is long on talk and is really hard to figure out. It has something to do with experiments on mentally ill people and a drug that opens the mind to parasites from another dimension( I think). There are some bloody scenes that liven it up a bit but this movie is so slow and disjointed they don't help. Maybe a bigger budget and script rewrite would have helped.
Cheap and Cheerful
Ok horror flick that has some good ideas. It's a little short on production budget though and some of the acting does suck but by in large the film kept you going with some intersting ideas, a good score and occasionally gory effects. 6 out of 10
Invest in something else
Whoa! This movie was bad. I can't believe how the DVD box in my local video store totally contradicted the actual movie itself. However, I won't claim false advertising. I was a sucker and blew about $2.00 Canadian to rent this thing. $2.00 that could have gone towards something far more useful, like bent paper clips or defective elastic bands. DO NOT BE TEMPTED BY THE MOVIE BOX. THIS IS A TERRIBLE FILM. The acting is wooden, the audio is worse. You really do not care what happens to the characters. It has already been mentioned that the idea was good, but it was not done right. I agree. The people who made this film did have a good idea and could have done a lot more with it.
Did you know
- TriviaUri Geller's scenes were added after the film was completed because it was felt that the film was too complicated and some kind of explanation was needed.
- GoofsIts a common goof, but however small always breaks the film "spell". One of the mourners makes the classic mistake of looking directly at the camera, just after the punch up at the wake, but the real beauty of it is that it's as if she forgot they were filming (so "into" the role), and was surprised to see a camera in the room, check out the double take at the camera, then swift realisation of her GOOF and aversion of the eyes away! Luckily the tall baldy chap is acting so well most people miss this goof.
- Alternate versionsOriginally released as "Diagnosis", the film was shortened and retitled Sanitarium for the US release. A special edition was released in the UK featuring additional gore and action sequences.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Darkhunters (2004)
- SoundtracksBurnt Toast and Hangovers
Written by Roberts & Buttery
Performed by Chief Wooden-head
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $10,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 26m(86 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
