Oxen Split Torturing

Well technically it's torture chambers, as there are two tales of twisted terror in this brutal anthology.

The first concerns disgraced samurai and his forbidden love punished by a sadistic daimyo who enjoys watching his captives suffer the most miserable forms of torture imaginable (e.g. Boiled, burned, beaten, eviscerated and of course the titular dissection technique). The second story features a more comic tone in its telling of a fool who becomes enamoured by a playful but somewhat ambivalent yujo, leading to his eventual downfall.

Whilst there's an abundance of savagery on display across both tales, there's one particularly sordid scene in the second story which in my humble opinion takes the title outright. Probably the most shocking and outrageous thing I've seen on screen; the nauseous reaction of the bystanders in that scene seems sickeningly appropriate and viewers vulnerable to sympathetic spewing are forewarned.

Dirty it may be, but it's by no means cheap looking incorporating a broad range of camera angles, energetic score and first-rate performances played with remarkable conviction despite uncomfortable looking depictions of sexual violence (fogged for our wellbeing).

Not especially realistic looking gore by modern standards (the concealment & substitution camera tricks are fairly obvious to spot), this would've still been confronting when it was released back in '76/'77, and it remains effective today for fans of extreme cinema.

Oxen Split Torture is apparently a follow up to the omnibus style torture flick Joy of Torture released in 1968. I have no idea if there are actually any links between the two films (other than content) and I'm thinking that this film is just trying to cash in on the popularity(?) of the earlier one. That sort of thing is often a recipe for a terrible film; but actually, for what it is, Oxen Split Torture is really rather good. The first film had three separate stories; this one only has two and it's a good deal shorter, but it's also much nastier. The plots of both of the stories focus on torture; I'm not going to get into the specifics of either because the plot lines are not important. What is important is the gore and while the film is not overly gory all the way through - when it does feature the red stuff, it features it heavily and some of the torture scenes really are quite shocking - a scene that sees a man have his foot literally battered away from his leg is a particular highlight in that respect. Director Yuuji Makiguchi really takes care to ensure that the gore scenes are as realistic and graphic as possible; and that is a huge positive for the film. If you want to see something cringe-worthy, don't miss this! I would even go as far as to say that Oxen Split Torture is superior to the original Joy of Torture - it might not be as classy, but it's much more violent and that's all anyone can ask for from a torture flick.

The film is divided in two parts: 1st half in 1600s of Edo and the 2nd half in 1800s of the Imperial Japan. The first half of the movie ultra violent nature of that hostile Edo rule depicting gore and horrific scenes might make your skin crawl. The second half of the film tones down the violence a bit adding some dark humor and Black Comedy so as to show the society did progressed from it's Barbaric approaches of tortures or sexual violence to more humiliating approaches where the intention was to break them morally. The film certainly not suited for general audience because it would certainly lead you to depression.

I found this to be more entertaining than I expected, which is probably due to the unexpectedly high production values. Very strange that an extreme film like this should have a decent budget. I should add that the first sequence is superior, since it is far more dramatically effective. The second segment is almost played for laughs, at times, which would almost seem unbelievable if you were unfamiliar with the extreme end of Japanese cinema. There is no end of gurning and pratfalling from the main protagonist (and others) in the latter part, as well as a few relatively comedic incidents - one involving a pit of human waste. You would almost expect this to be intended as light relief, to send the punters home somewhat less disturbed after the unremittingly bleak first story, and that is how this tale begins. The main man is punished for being unable to pay for his night of debauchery by being lightly humiliated and forced to work in the brothel. The previously mentioned dog-licking is up next, lulling the unprepared viewer into a false sense of security, as an extremely horrible abortion follows, involving a double whammy of stamping and kicking to the gut, followed by the archetypal old-crone-abortionist going in up to the elbow. This latter is accompanied by what sounds like the electronic equivalent of a swanee whistle on the soundtrack, but I don't think the similarity was intentional. Later on, this prostitute dies slowly, as a result, in a brilliantly effective sequence. She really does look pale and deathly, and the barbaric treatment and it's outcome are portrayed unflinchingly. This early death denies our cruel buddies some torture fun. This is not the case at all in the first half. The baddie of the piece is a nasty magistrate, played with OTT eye-bulging lunacy that veers wonderfully close to the edge of over acting. He gets to do all sorts of unspeakable acts to a succession of hapless christians, and the effect is bleak and cruel throughout. It is also quite tragic; well acted; and well filmed. Kudos also, to the soundtrack composer - there is some decent stuff on here, from the moog-out over the opening credits, to some very nice, more traditional soundtrack material later on. Not as gory as I expected, this is still fairly gruesome. The curious shouldn't be put off by the idea that there is unrelenting blood and guts churning away: it's the nastiness and cruelty that make this film exceptional, not the red stuff.

With a name like Shogun's Sadism you rather know what to expect. Or at any rate you should, and if you don't, it probably isn't a film for you. I could wrap up this review in a sentence or two just giving a few select highlights of the frequent torture, but its more interesting than that for me, for a few reasons. The first comes in the opening credits, they play over a montage of sepia toned historical imagery that meant very little to me (some kind of account of nastiness down the ages perhaps though the context was lost on me) but the last of them is of the bomb. Its a puzzling way to start such a film and rather had me scratching my head. Does it make the film an act of prostration, an admittance of the horrors of feudal Japan? Perhaps a sobering reminder of mans limitless capacity for horrifying violence? Me, I thought it over and eventually came to figuring that its a snub, a way of saying "You thought the A-bomb was pretty hardcore? Try some of this on for size", or whatever the dignified Japanese equivalent of that would be. The other points are in the very nature of the thing and the state of nasty horror today. It's interesting to me that commentators from morality humping imbeciles to language abusing soundbiters to morons of most stripes like to throw around the term of "torture porn" when talking about almost any horror these days where the violence is relatively graphic and the intent reasonably nasty. All this nonsense about genre decline, hell the whole danged decline of the arts in general, even humanity in general comes rather into sharp relief when one considers that the Japanese have been making meaner films than the average effort decried as "torture porn" for many years previous. And lastly, I found the character of the evil shogun who drives the film's first half to be a rather prescient creation. A forerunner of the sort of people who made the Saw franchise a runaway success, he bores easily of torture and demands more, ever more and more creative methods in fashion that can't help but make me think of those who ceaselessly glut the multiplexes for their fix of ever dafter traps. Now as well as having some generic interest, Shogun's Sadism serves up two quite decent stories in a manner well made and acted throughout. Firstly we have nice guy samurai Iori falling for a girl who tends to his wounds in an hour of need. Unfortunately she is a Christian, Christians are persona non grata in feudal Japan and the results are terrible for all concerned. Second up we have conman Sutezo, throwing is weight around in a brothel before being forced to serve as he has no money. Eventually things get so nasty he elects to escape with one of the hookers, but things just keep getting worse. And like before, results are terrible. Director Yuji Makiguchi captures all without flinching, only shifting the camera's gaze in cases where an effect might be spoilt by overexposure, he also handles the actors well. Some hand-held camera work goes into the mix as well for moments of action and there's generally fine cinematography it all makes for a classy package. Far classier perhaps than is deserved for a film whose delights include a multitude of stabbing, burning, hacking, maiming and at one point an thoroughly horrid forced abortion, but classiness makes for a smooth watch. This surely won't be for everyone but if really mean spirited Japanese exploitation filth is your cup of tea, its essential stuff.