10 years after the first Alien object (Torus) arose. Two more Torus appear causing havoc on a global level.10 years after the first Alien object (Torus) arose. Two more Torus appear causing havoc on a global level.10 years after the first Alien object (Torus) arose. Two more Torus appear causing havoc on a global level.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Angel Boris Reed
- Sondra
- (as Angel Boris)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.3716
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Very good
I wish I could've seen this high budget movie in theaters, i loved the first one, and it kept me interested throughout. The plot was very much the same as the first one mixed with a bit of Taken, but that isn't bad, very good in fact, the plot was good, the religious overtones worked real well like in the first movie. There was also good acting, David Keith was real natural in his role, and just about all the characters likable when supposed to be and dislikable when supposed to be. All in all, the best tho hours I've had in recent weeks. A good watch.
laughable
Quite literally, this movie was laughable. The acting is atrocious, my friends and I were busting up laughing in every single scene. It was fairly entertaining, actually, it is the sort of movie that will end up on Mystery Science Theatre 4000 in about 20 years. It looks like they blew all of their mid-level budget on the computer effects scenes, which are decent. The rest of the movie takes place in and out of various tents, and the Torus... which looks suspiciously like a laser tag arena that they rented for a few hours one afternoon. The plot is silly and obvious, the religious overtones are blatant to the point of being insulting. If you want to see a melodramatic cheesy sci-fi movie, this one delivers in spades.
The hero looks like the Fat Elvis version of David Hasselhoff. Enough said.
The hero looks like the Fat Elvis version of David Hasselhoff. Enough said.
Two devices, two different effects on people
The previous commenter got confused somehow.
There were two devices. The one in Paris healed people but the one in Russia killed people. The men that injured and killed and then stayed so were at the Russian site. I wonder why they didn't bring up this difference when considering which of the devices they should attack, but I suppose that is asking for too much from a movie like this.
Now if the poster wanted to talk about the bad things in the movie he could have brought up the dialog or perhaps the poorly thought out bad guys, or some of the other quick fixes the movie took. The bad guys didn't seem to have much reason for their decisions other than a fear of something different. They also seemed to miss a major plot point after all of their study.
So while the movie isn't that good it did at least stay consistent. I wonder if we will be seeing a third movie in a few years to help further explain/muddy the water.
There were two devices. The one in Paris healed people but the one in Russia killed people. The men that injured and killed and then stayed so were at the Russian site. I wonder why they didn't bring up this difference when considering which of the devices they should attack, but I suppose that is asking for too much from a movie like this.
Now if the poster wanted to talk about the bad things in the movie he could have brought up the dialog or perhaps the poorly thought out bad guys, or some of the other quick fixes the movie took. The bad guys didn't seem to have much reason for their decisions other than a fear of something different. They also seemed to miss a major plot point after all of their study.
So while the movie isn't that good it did at least stay consistent. I wonder if we will be seeing a third movie in a few years to help further explain/muddy the water.
TV dreck
amateurish space trash.
politically retarded; scientifically inaccurate; religiously barbaric.
and of course, there's the bad story; bad photography; bad editing; laughably inept dialog.
no point talking about the acting here; these 'professional' actors are reciting lines on cue without any sense that the lines might accumulate into meaningful speech - for the simple reason that it is impossible for them to accumulate into some kind of meaningful speech - it is the usual TV-space-trash babble that people in LSD-flashback really admire.
crap.
politically retarded; scientifically inaccurate; religiously barbaric.
and of course, there's the bad story; bad photography; bad editing; laughably inept dialog.
no point talking about the acting here; these 'professional' actors are reciting lines on cue without any sense that the lines might accumulate into meaningful speech - for the simple reason that it is impossible for them to accumulate into some kind of meaningful speech - it is the usual TV-space-trash babble that people in LSD-flashback really admire.
crap.
Much worse than original
Wooden acting and a non-sensical plot kill this remake. If you like the first one, skip this. Multiple plot lines all jumble together to no satisfactory conclusions. David Keith, one of my favorites, acts like he never read the script until just before they call "Action".
Did you know
- TriviaBefore the Torus is unlocked and entered, one of the displays used to monitor technical data is exactly the same display used in Deep Core (2000).
- GoofsThe text graphic displayed when showing Manila, Philippines is misspelled "MANILLA"
- ConnectionsFollows Epoch (2001)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content


