10 years after the first Alien object (Torus) arose. Two more Torus appear causing havoc on a global level.10 years after the first Alien object (Torus) arose. Two more Torus appear causing havoc on a global level.10 years after the first Alien object (Torus) arose. Two more Torus appear causing havoc on a global level.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Angel Boris Reed
- Sondra
- (as Angel Boris)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.3716
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Much worse than original
Wooden acting and a non-sensical plot kill this remake. If you like the first one, skip this. Multiple plot lines all jumble together to no satisfactory conclusions. David Keith, one of my favorites, acts like he never read the script until just before they call "Action".
Two devices, two different effects on people
The previous commenter got confused somehow.
There were two devices. The one in Paris healed people but the one in Russia killed people. The men that injured and killed and then stayed so were at the Russian site. I wonder why they didn't bring up this difference when considering which of the devices they should attack, but I suppose that is asking for too much from a movie like this.
Now if the poster wanted to talk about the bad things in the movie he could have brought up the dialog or perhaps the poorly thought out bad guys, or some of the other quick fixes the movie took. The bad guys didn't seem to have much reason for their decisions other than a fear of something different. They also seemed to miss a major plot point after all of their study.
So while the movie isn't that good it did at least stay consistent. I wonder if we will be seeing a third movie in a few years to help further explain/muddy the water.
There were two devices. The one in Paris healed people but the one in Russia killed people. The men that injured and killed and then stayed so were at the Russian site. I wonder why they didn't bring up this difference when considering which of the devices they should attack, but I suppose that is asking for too much from a movie like this.
Now if the poster wanted to talk about the bad things in the movie he could have brought up the dialog or perhaps the poorly thought out bad guys, or some of the other quick fixes the movie took. The bad guys didn't seem to have much reason for their decisions other than a fear of something different. They also seemed to miss a major plot point after all of their study.
So while the movie isn't that good it did at least stay consistent. I wonder if we will be seeing a third movie in a few years to help further explain/muddy the water.
TV dreck
amateurish space trash.
politically retarded; scientifically inaccurate; religiously barbaric.
and of course, there's the bad story; bad photography; bad editing; laughably inept dialog.
no point talking about the acting here; these 'professional' actors are reciting lines on cue without any sense that the lines might accumulate into meaningful speech - for the simple reason that it is impossible for them to accumulate into some kind of meaningful speech - it is the usual TV-space-trash babble that people in LSD-flashback really admire.
crap.
politically retarded; scientifically inaccurate; religiously barbaric.
and of course, there's the bad story; bad photography; bad editing; laughably inept dialog.
no point talking about the acting here; these 'professional' actors are reciting lines on cue without any sense that the lines might accumulate into meaningful speech - for the simple reason that it is impossible for them to accumulate into some kind of meaningful speech - it is the usual TV-space-trash babble that people in LSD-flashback really admire.
crap.
Nowhere as bad as others say.
While this film was not the film the original was it was still entertaining and David Keith was still on his game. The plot did repeat a great deal of the first film but with interesting differences. I would like to have known who the actor was who played the son, David, which was not listed in the film's credits for some reason. The effects were excellent and it is always a treat to see Billy Dee Williams in action. As always the Torus effect was amazing. This film would really have been something if presented on an Imax screen. The villain, Doyle was the one weak link in the film. He was too whiny to be credible and did not seem very threatening, just dumb.
This is a good film to waste an hour and a half on.
This is a good film to waste an hour and a half on.
An Interesting Sci Fi Sequel that Can't Escape the Weak Script
9 June 2012. Poor acting in places, illogical jumps of believable plot outcomes make for a by the numbers sequel. The beginning sequences of an assassin who really doesn't look much like a very good one starts out losing most of the movie's steam by the time the potentially intriguing torus appears again, and yet the international military conflict seems oddly manipulatively even though the hoped for tight script shows through briefly. There are just too many pat answers, predictable outcomes to make this movie really that enjoyable or interesting. This movie is a let down and disappointment. The special effects, especially of the torus which seems a lot worse for wear is perhaps the real disaster. There is too much warmed over from the original to keep a sustained interest.
Did you know
- TriviaBefore the Torus is unlocked and entered, one of the displays used to monitor technical data is exactly the same display used in Deep Core (2000).
- GoofsThe text graphic displayed when showing Manila, Philippines is misspelled "MANILLA"
- ConnectionsFollows Epoch (2001)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content


